Suppr超能文献

NAL-NL2经验性调整。

NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

作者信息

Keidser Gitte, Dillon Harvey, Carter Lyndal, O'Brien Anna

机构信息

National Acoustic Laboratories and the HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, Chatswood, Australia.

出版信息

Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):211-23. doi: 10.1177/1084713812468511. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

Abstract

NAL-NL1, the first procedure from the National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) for prescribing nonlinear gain, was a purely theoretically derived formula aimed at maximizing speech intelligibility for any input level of speech while keeping the overall loudness of speech at or below normal loudness. The formula was obtained through an optimization process in which speech intelligibility and loudness were predicted from selected models. Using updated models and applying some revisions to the derivation process, a theoretically derived NAL-NL2 formula was obtained in a similar way. Further adjustments, directed by empirical data collected in studies using NAL-NL1 as the baseline response, have been made to the theoretically derived formula. Specifically, empirical data have demonstrated that (a) female hearing aid users prefer lower overall gain than male users; (b) new hearing aid users with more than a mild hearing loss prefer increasingly less gain with increasing degree of hearing loss than experienced hearing aid users, and require up to 2 years to adapt to gain levels selected by experienced hearing aid users; (c) unilaterally and bilaterally fitted hearing aid users prefer overall gain levels that vary less than estimated by the bilateral correction factor; (d) adults prefer lower overall gain than children; and (e) people with severe/profound hearing loss prefer lower compression ratios than predicted when fitted with fast-acting compression. The literature and data leading to these conclusions are summarized and discussed in this article, and the procedure for implementing the adjustments to the theoretically derived NAL-NL2 formula is described.

摘要

NAL-NL1是国家声学实验室(NAL)推出的首个规定非线性增益的方法,它是一个完全基于理论推导的公式,旨在使任何语音输入水平下的语音清晰度最大化,同时将语音的整体响度保持在正常响度或低于正常响度。该公式是通过一个优化过程得出的,在这个过程中,语音清晰度和响度是根据选定的模型预测出来的。使用更新后的模型并对推导过程进行一些修订后,以类似的方式得出了理论推导的NAL-NL2公式。以使用NAL-NL1作为基线反应的研究中收集的经验数据为指导,对理论推导公式进行了进一步调整。具体而言,经验数据表明:(a)女性助听器使用者比男性使用者更喜欢较低的整体增益;(b)听力损失超过轻度的新助听器使用者比有经验的助听器使用者随着听力损失程度的增加更喜欢越来越少的增益,并且需要长达两年的时间来适应有经验的助听器使用者选择的增益水平;(c)单侧和双侧佩戴助听器的使用者更喜欢整体增益水平的变化小于双边校正因子估计的变化;(d)成年人比儿童更喜欢较低的整体增益;(e)重度/极重度听力损失患者在使用快速作用压缩时,更喜欢比预测值更低的压缩比。本文总结并讨论了得出这些结论的文献和数据,并描述了对理论推导的NAL-NL2公式进行调整的实施过程。

相似文献

1
NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.
Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):211-23. doi: 10.1177/1084713812468511. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.
Trends Amplif. 2012 Sep;16(3):159-72. doi: 10.1177/1084713812465494. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
9
Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):83-95. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182650adf.
10
Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):483-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000285.

引用本文的文献

3
[Hearing aid provision and quality assurance].
HNO. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s00106-025-01626-z.
4
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Otology: Past, Present, and Future.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 13;13(24):7577. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247577.
5
Development and Evaluation of a Loudness Validation Method With Natural Signals for Hearing Aid Fitting.
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241299778. doi: 10.1177/23312165241299778.
6
In-situ Audiometry Compared to Conventional Audiometry for Hearing Aid Fitting.
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241259704. doi: 10.1177/23312165241259704.
7
Gut yeast diversity of (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under different dietary conditions.
Front Microbiol. 2024 May 2;15:1287083. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1287083. eCollection 2024.
8

本文引用的文献

1
Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments.
Trends Amplif. 2012 Mar;16(1):49-58. doi: 10.1177/1084713811424884. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
5
Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use.
Int J Audiol. 2010 Jan;49 Suppl 1:S49-63. doi: 10.3109/14992020903148038.
8
Testing the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis with hearing-impaired listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):310-7. doi: 10.1121/1.3133703.
9
Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;19(10):758-73. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.10.4.
10
Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.
Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):234-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181976993.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验