Weigler Benjamin J, Cooper Donna R, Hankenson F Claire
Washington National Primate Research Center, Department of Comparative Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012;51(5):561-73.
A national survey was conducted to assess immunization practices and tuberculosis screening methods for animal care and research workers in biomedical settings throughout the United States. Veterinarians (n = 953) were surveyed via a web-based mechanism; completed surveys (n = 308) were analyzed. Results showed that occupational health and safety programs were well-developed, enrolling veterinary, husbandry, and research staff at rates exceeding 90% and involving multiple modalities of health assessments and risk communication for vaccine-preventable diseases. Most (72.7%) institutions did not store serum samples from animal research personnel. More than half of the institutions housed nonhuman primates and maintained tuberculosis screening programs, although screening methods varied. Immunization protocols included various recommended or required vaccines that differed depending on job duties, type of institution, and nature of scientific programs. A single case of an identified vaccine-preventable illness in a laboratory worker was noted. Tetanus toxoid was the predominant vaccine administered (91.7%) to animal care and research workers, followed by hepatitis B (54.8%), influenza (39.9%), and rabies (38.3%). For some immunization protocols, an inconsistent rationale for administration was evident. Indications that animal care and research workers are unprotected from work-related etiologic agents did not emerge from this survey; rather, existing guidelines from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and available biologics seem sufficient to address most needs of the laboratory animal research community. Institutions should commit to performance-based standards in parallel with context-specific risk assessment methods to maintain occupational health and safety programs and practices appropriate to their needs.
在美国各地的生物医学环境中,开展了一项全国性调查,以评估动物护理和研究人员的免疫接种情况以及结核病筛查方法。通过基于网络的机制对兽医(n = 953)进行了调查;对完成的调查问卷(n = 308)进行了分析。结果显示,职业健康与安全计划发展良好,兽医、饲养员和研究人员的参与率超过90%,并且涉及针对疫苗可预防疾病的多种健康评估和风险沟通方式。大多数机构(72.7%)不保存动物研究人员的血清样本。超过半数的机构饲养非人灵长类动物并维持结核病筛查计划,不过筛查方法各不相同。免疫接种方案包括各种推荐或要求接种的疫苗,这些疫苗因工作职责、机构类型和科研项目性质而异。注意到有一名实验室工作人员确诊感染了一种疫苗可预防的疾病。破伤风类毒素是给动物护理和研究人员接种的主要疫苗(91.7%),其次是乙肝疫苗(54.8%)、流感疫苗(39.9%)和狂犬病疫苗(38.3%)。对于一些免疫接种方案,接种理由不一致的情况很明显。此次调查未发现动物护理和研究人员未受到与工作相关病原体保护的迹象;相反,免疫实践咨询委员会的现有指南和可用生物制品似乎足以满足实验动物研究群体的大多数需求。各机构应采用基于绩效的标准并结合具体情况的风险评估方法,以维持适合其需求的职业健康与安全计划及做法。