The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):386-95. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12024. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
People are more resistant to criticisms of their group when those criticisms are made by an outgroup rather than an ingroup member, a phenomenon referred to as the intergroup sensitivity effect (ISE). The current study compared four competing models of how argument quality would moderate the ISE, with a view to establishing the complex interrelationships between source and message effects in group-directed criticism. Quality of the argument affected responses to ingroup critics, but not to outgroup critics. For outsiders who wish to promote positive change and reform in a group culture, this leads to a somewhat depressing conclusion: their message is likely to be rejected regardless of whether it is objectively 'right', well-considered, well-justified, or well-argued.
当批评来自外群体而不是内群体成员时,人们对外群体的批评会更有抵抗力,这种现象被称为群体间敏感性效应(ISE)。本研究比较了四种竞争模型,以确定在群体导向批评中来源和信息效应之间的复杂相互关系,从而探讨论点质量如何调节 ISE。论点的质量影响对内群体批评者的反应,但对外群体批评者没有影响。对于那些希望在群体文化中促进积极变革和改革的局外人来说,这得出了一个有点令人沮丧的结论:无论他们的信息是否客观“正确”、深思熟虑、有充分依据或论证充分,他们的信息都可能被拒绝。