The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York 10015, USA.
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.004. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
Theoretical models and correlational research suggest that anger and disgust play different roles in moral judgment. Anger is theorized to underlie reactions to crimes against persons, such as battery and unfairness, and disgust is theorized to underlie reactions to crimes against nature, such as sexual transgressions and cannibalism. To date, however, it has not been shown that induction of these two emotions has divergent effects. In this experiment we show divergent effects of anger and disgust. We use sounds to elicit anger and disgust, and participants are then asked to consider moral vignettes. As compared to disgust and control condition, anger increases severity of judgments about crimes against persons, and disgust increases severity of judgments about crimes against nature, but not conversely.
理论模型和相关性研究表明,愤怒和厌恶在道德判断中扮演着不同的角色。愤怒被认为是对人身伤害犯罪(如殴打和不公平待遇)的反应基础,而厌恶则被认为是对违反自然的犯罪(如性侵犯和食人行为)的反应基础。然而,到目前为止,还没有表明这两种情绪的诱导会产生不同的影响。在这项实验中,我们展示了愤怒和厌恶的不同影响。我们使用声音来引发愤怒和厌恶,然后让参与者考虑道德事例。与厌恶和对照组相比,愤怒会增加对人身伤害犯罪的判断的严厉程度,而厌恶则会增加对违反自然的犯罪的判断的严厉程度,但反之则不然。