Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Strathclyde, Scotland, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052735. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
Access to Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression is limited. One solution is CBT self-help books. Trial Objectives: To assess the impact of a guided self-help CBT book (GSH-CBT) on mood, compared to treatment as usual (TAU).
GSH-CBT will have improved mood and knowledge of the causes and treatment of depression compared to the control receiving TAUGuided self-help will be acceptable to patients and staff.
Adults attending seven general practices in Glasgow, UK with a BDI-II score of ≥14. 141 randomised to GSH-CBT and 140 to TAU.
RCT comparing 'Overcoming Depression: A Five Areas Approach' book plus 3-4 short face to face support appointments totalling up to 2 hours of guided support, compared with general practitioner TAU.
The BDI (II) score at 4 months. Numbers analysed: 281 at baseline, 203 at 4 months (primary outcome), 117 at 12 months.
Mean BDI-II scores were lower in the GSH-CBT group at 4 months by 5.3 points (2.6 to 7.9, p<0.001). At 4 and 12 months there were also significantly higher proportions of participants achieving a 50% reduction in BDI-II in the GSH-CBT arm. The mean support was 2 sessions with 42.7 minutes for session 1, 41.4 minutes for session 2 and 40.2 minutes of support for session 3. Adverse effects/Harms: Significantly less deterioration in mood in GSH-CBT (2.0% compared to 9.8% in the TAU group for BDI-II category change).
Weaknesses: Our follow-up rate of 72.2% at 4 months is better than predicted but is poorer at 12 months (41.6%). In the GSH-CBT arm, around 50% of people attended 2 or fewer sessions. 22% failed to take up treatment.
GSH-CBT is substantially more effective than TAU.
Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN13475030.
获得认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗抑郁症的机会有限。一种解决方案是 CBT 自助书籍。试验目的:评估指导自助 CBT 书籍(GSH-CBT)对情绪的影响,与常规治疗(TAU)相比。
与接受 TAU 的对照组相比,GSH-CBT 将改善情绪以及对抑郁症病因和治疗的了解。指导自助对患者和工作人员是可以接受的。
英国格拉斯哥的七家普通诊所的成年人,BDI-II 评分为≥14。141 人随机分配到 GSH-CBT,140 人分配到 TAU。
RCT 比较“克服抑郁症:五个领域方法”书籍加 3-4 次面对面的短期支持预约,总时间长达 2 小时的指导支持,与普通科医生的 TAU 相比。
4 个月时 BDI(II)评分。分析数量:基线时 281 人,4 个月时 203 人(主要结果),12 个月时 117 人。
GSH-CBT 组在 4 个月时 BDI-II 评分平均降低 5.3 分(2.6 至 7.9,p<0.001)。在 4 个月和 12 个月时,GSH-CBT 组也有更高比例的参与者达到 BDI-II 减少 50%的目标。平均支持为 2 次会议,第 1 次会议 42.7 分钟,第 2 次会议 41.4 分钟,第 3 次会议 40.2 分钟。不良事件/危害:GSH-CBT 组的情绪恶化明显较少(BDI-II 类别变化,GSH-CBT 组为 2.0%,TAU 组为 9.8%)。
弱点:我们在 4 个月时的随访率为 72.2%,好于预期,但在 12 个月时(41.6%)较差。在 GSH-CBT 臂中,约有 50%的人参加了 2 次或更少的会议。22%的人未能接受治疗。
GSH-CBT 比 TAU 更有效。
Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN8120422。