Suppr超能文献

在初级保健中指导自助认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症:一项随机对照试验。

Guided self-help cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Strathclyde, Scotland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052735. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression is limited. One solution is CBT self-help books. Trial Objectives: To assess the impact of a guided self-help CBT book (GSH-CBT) on mood, compared to treatment as usual (TAU).

HYPOTHESES

GSH-CBT will have improved mood and knowledge of the causes and treatment of depression compared to the control receiving TAUGuided self-help will be acceptable to patients and staff.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults attending seven general practices in Glasgow, UK with a BDI-II score of ≥14. 141 randomised to GSH-CBT and 140 to TAU.

INTERVENTIONS

RCT comparing 'Overcoming Depression: A Five Areas Approach' book plus 3-4 short face to face support appointments totalling up to 2 hours of guided support, compared with general practitioner TAU.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

The BDI (II) score at 4 months. Numbers analysed: 281 at baseline, 203 at 4 months (primary outcome), 117 at 12 months.

OUTCOME

Mean BDI-II scores were lower in the GSH-CBT group at 4 months by 5.3 points (2.6 to 7.9, p<0.001). At 4 and 12 months there were also significantly higher proportions of participants achieving a 50% reduction in BDI-II in the GSH-CBT arm. The mean support was 2 sessions with 42.7 minutes for session 1, 41.4 minutes for session 2 and 40.2 minutes of support for session 3. Adverse effects/Harms: Significantly less deterioration in mood in GSH-CBT (2.0% compared to 9.8% in the TAU group for BDI-II category change).

LIMITATIONS

Weaknesses: Our follow-up rate of 72.2% at 4 months is better than predicted but is poorer at 12 months (41.6%). In the GSH-CBT arm, around 50% of people attended 2 or fewer sessions. 22% failed to take up treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

GSH-CBT is substantially more effective than TAU.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN13475030.

摘要

背景

获得认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗抑郁症的机会有限。一种解决方案是 CBT 自助书籍。试验目的:评估指导自助 CBT 书籍(GSH-CBT)对情绪的影响,与常规治疗(TAU)相比。

假设

与接受 TAU 的对照组相比,GSH-CBT 将改善情绪以及对抑郁症病因和治疗的了解。指导自助对患者和工作人员是可以接受的。

参与者

英国格拉斯哥的七家普通诊所的成年人,BDI-II 评分为≥14。141 人随机分配到 GSH-CBT,140 人分配到 TAU。

干预措施

RCT 比较“克服抑郁症:五个领域方法”书籍加 3-4 次面对面的短期支持预约,总时间长达 2 小时的指导支持,与普通科医生的 TAU 相比。

主要结果

4 个月时 BDI(II)评分。分析数量:基线时 281 人,4 个月时 203 人(主要结果),12 个月时 117 人。

结果

GSH-CBT 组在 4 个月时 BDI-II 评分平均降低 5.3 分(2.6 至 7.9,p<0.001)。在 4 个月和 12 个月时,GSH-CBT 组也有更高比例的参与者达到 BDI-II 减少 50%的目标。平均支持为 2 次会议,第 1 次会议 42.7 分钟,第 2 次会议 41.4 分钟,第 3 次会议 40.2 分钟。不良事件/危害:GSH-CBT 组的情绪恶化明显较少(BDI-II 类别变化,GSH-CBT 组为 2.0%,TAU 组为 9.8%)。

局限性

弱点:我们在 4 个月时的随访率为 72.2%,好于预期,但在 12 个月时(41.6%)较差。在 GSH-CBT 臂中,约有 50%的人参加了 2 次或更少的会议。22%的人未能接受治疗。

结论

GSH-CBT 比 TAU 更有效。

试验注册

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN8120422。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Bibliotherapy: Reading OVID During COVID.阅读疗法:在新冠疫情期间阅读《奥维德》
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 7;11:567539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567539. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验