Suppr超能文献

“C 因素”和光激活技术对树脂复合材料聚合收缩力的影响。

The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite.

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;20(6):603-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000600003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three different pairs of steel moving bases were connected to a universal testing machine (emic DL 500): groups A and B - 2x2 mm (CF=0.33), groups C and D - 3x2 mm (CF=0.66), groups e and F - 6x2 mm (CF=1.5). After adjustment of the height between the pair of bases so that the resin had a volume of 12 mm³ in all groups, the material was inserted and polymerized by two different methods: pulse delay (100 mW/cm² for 5 s, 40 s interval, 600 mW/cm² for 20 s) and continuous pulse (600 mW/cm² for 20 s). Each configuration was light cured with both techniques. Tensions generated during polymerization were recorded by 120 s. The values were expressed in curves (Force(N) x Time(s)) and averages compared by statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p<0.05).

RESULTS

For the 2x2 and 3x2 bases, with a reduced C-Factor, significant differences were found between the light curing methods. For 6x2 base, with high C-Factor, the light curing method did not influence the contraction forces of the composite resin.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulse delay technique can determine less stress on tooth/restoration interface of adhesive restorations only when a reduced C-Factor is present.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了腔配置因子(“C-Factor”)和光激活技术对 Bis-GMA 基复合材料(Charisma,Heraeus Kulzer)聚合收缩力的影响。

材料和方法

三组不同的钢移动底座连接到万能试验机(emic DL 500):组 A 和 B - 2x2mm(CF=0.33),组 C 和 D - 3x2mm(CF=0.66),组 e 和 F - 6x2mm(CF=1.5)。在调整底座之间的高度,使所有组中的树脂体积均为 12mm³后,插入材料并通过两种不同方法聚合:脉冲延迟(100mW/cm²,5s,40s 间隔,600mW/cm²,20s)和连续脉冲(600mW/cm²,20s)。两种技术都对每种配置进行光固化。聚合过程中产生的张力通过 120s 记录。结果以曲线(力(N)x 时间(s))表示,并通过统计分析(ANOVA 和 Tukey 检验,p<0.05)比较平均值。

结果

对于 2x2 和 3x2 底座,C-Factor 降低时,光固化方法之间存在显著差异。对于 6x2 底座,C-Factor 较高时,光固化方法不会影响复合树脂的收缩力。

结论

只有在降低 C-Factor 的情况下,脉冲延迟技术才能确定对黏附修复体的牙/修复体界面的应力较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3603/3881863/64ebe2fe3e03/jaos-20-06-0603-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验