Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(1):e1965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001965. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
Immunosuppression, which has become an increasingly relevant clinical condition in the last 50 years, modifies the natural history of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in most patients with Chagas disease. The main goal in this setting is to prevent the consequences of reactivation of T. cruzi infection by close monitoring. We analyze the relationship between Chagas disease and three immunosuppressant conditions, including a description of clinical cases seen at our center, a brief review of the literature, and recommendations for the management of these patients based on our experience and on the data in the literature. T. cruzi infection is considered an opportunistic parasitic infection indicative of AIDS, and clinical manifestations of reactivation are more severe than in acute Chagas disease. Parasitemia is the most important defining feature of reactivation. Treatment with benznidazole and/or nifurtimox is strongly recommended in such cases. It seems reasonable to administer trypanocidal treatment only to asymptomatic immunosuppressed patients with detectable parasitemia, and/or patients with clinically defined reactivation. Specific treatment for Chagas disease does not appear to be related to a higher incidence of neoplasms, and a direct role of T. cruzi in the etiology of neoplastic disease has not been confirmed. Systemic immunosuppressive diseases or immunosuppressants can modify the natural course of T. cruzi infection. Immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids have not been associated with higher rates of reactivation of Chagas disease. Despite a lack of evidence-based data, treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox should be initiated before immunosuppression where possible to reduce the risk of reactivation. Timely antiparasitic treatment with benznidazole and nifurtimox (or with posaconazole in cases of therapeutic failure) has proven to be highly effective in preventing Chagas disease reactivation, even if such treatment has not been formally incorporated into management protocols for immunosuppressed patients. International consensus guidelines based on expert opinion would greatly contribute to standardizing the management of immunosuppressed patients with Chagas disease.
免疫抑制在过去 50 年中已成为一种越来越重要的临床情况,它改变了大多数恰加斯病患者中克氏锥虫感染的自然史。在这种情况下的主要目标是通过密切监测来预防克氏锥虫感染再激活的后果。我们分析了恰加斯病与三种免疫抑制剂状况的关系,包括描述我们中心所见的临床病例、简要回顾文献以及根据我们的经验和文献中的数据为这些患者管理提供建议。克氏锥虫感染被认为是艾滋病的机会性寄生虫感染,再激活的临床表现比急性恰加斯病更为严重。寄生虫血症是再激活的最重要定义特征。在这种情况下强烈推荐使用苯硝唑和/或硝呋替莫进行治疗。似乎合理的做法是仅对无症状免疫抑制且有可检测寄生虫血症的患者,和/或有临床定义的再激活的患者,给予驱寄生虫治疗。针对恰加斯病的特定治疗似乎与肿瘤发病率的升高无关,并且克氏锥虫在肿瘤疾病病因学中的直接作用尚未得到证实。系统性免疫抑制性疾病或免疫抑制剂可改变克氏锥虫感染的自然病程。免疫抑制剂量的皮质类固醇与恰加斯病再激活率的升高无关。尽管缺乏基于证据的数据,但在开始免疫抑制之前,如有可能,应启动苯硝唑或硝呋替莫治疗,以降低再激活的风险。用苯硝唑和硝呋替莫(或在治疗失败的情况下用泊沙康唑)及时进行驱虫治疗已被证明在预防恰加斯病再激活方面非常有效,即使这种治疗尚未正式纳入免疫抑制患者的管理方案。基于专家意见的国际共识指南将极大地有助于规范免疫抑制患者恰加斯病的管理。