• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国公立学校听力筛查方案的变异性。

Variability of state school-based hearing screening protocols in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, HS83, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2013 Jun;38(3):569-74. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9652-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-013-9652-6
PMID:23355103
Abstract

The prevalence of hearing loss has increased among United States children. As schools commonly perform hearing screens, we sought to contrast current United States school-based hearing screening protocols. State department of health and education websites were reviewed to assess school hearing screening protocols for the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Individuals listed on these websites were contacted as necessary to confirm and/or acquire relevant data. School-based hearing screening is currently required in 34/51 (67 %) states. Of these 34 states, 28 (82 %) mandate grades for screening, but only 20 (59 %) require screening beyond 6th grade. Pure tone audiometry is the most common screening method (33/34 [97 %]). A majority of states screen at 1, 2 and 4 kHz usually at 20 or 25 dB hearing level. Six states recommend or require testing at 6 or 8 kHz, which is necessary to detect high-frequency hearing loss. The results indicate that United States school-based hearing screens vary significantly. They focus on low frequencies with few testing adolescents for whom high-frequency hearing loss has increased. Disparities in hearing loss detection are likely, particularly considering the evolution of hazardous noise exposures and rising prevalence of hearing loss.

摘要

美国儿童的听力损失患病率有所增加。由于学校通常会进行听力筛查,我们试图对比当前美国基于学校的听力筛查方案。我们查阅了州卫生和教育部的网站,以评估五十个州和哥伦比亚特区的学校听力筛查方案。如有必要,我们联系了这些网站上列出的人员,以确认和/或获取相关数据。目前,34/51(67%)个州要求在学校进行听力筛查。在这 34 个州中,28 个(82%)州规定了筛查年级,但只有 20 个(59%)州要求在 6 年级以后进行筛查。纯音测听是最常见的筛查方法(33/34 [97%])。大多数州在 1、2 和 4 kHz 频率处筛查,通常在 20 或 25 dB 听力级。六个州建议或要求在 6 或 8 kHz 频率处测试,这是检测高频听力损失所必需的。结果表明,美国基于学校的听力筛查存在显著差异。它们主要关注低频,很少对青少年进行高频听力测试,而高频听力损失的发病率正在上升。听力损失检测的差异很可能存在,尤其是考虑到危险噪声暴露的演变和听力损失的患病率上升。

相似文献

1
Variability of state school-based hearing screening protocols in the United States.美国公立学校听力筛查方案的变异性。
J Community Health. 2013 Jun;38(3):569-74. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9652-6.
2
Pilot study of a high-frequency school-based hearing screen to detect adolescent hearing loss.一项基于高频的学校听力筛查以检测青少年听力损失的初步研究。
J Med Screen. 2014 Mar;21(1):18-23. doi: 10.1177/0969141314524565. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
3
Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen.入学听力筛查的当前实践、准确性、有效性及成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Aug;11(32):1-168, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11320.
4
School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.基于言语噪声感知的学龄期儿童听力筛查:使用数字三音测试。
Ear Hear. 2018 Nov/Dec;39(6):1104-1115. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000563.
5
The Sensitivity of Adolescent School-Based Hearing Screens Is Significantly Improved by Adding High Frequencies.增加高频检测后,青少年学校听力筛查的灵敏度显著提高。
J Sch Nurs. 2016 Dec;32(6):416-422. doi: 10.1177/1059840516654004. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Grade repetition and parents' perception of hearing loss: An analysis of data from children in the United States.留级与家长对听力损失的认知:对美国儿童数据的分析
Laryngoscope. 2017 Mar;127(3):741-745. doi: 10.1002/lary.26131. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Comparison of audiometric screening criteria for the identification of noise-induced hearing loss in adolescents.青少年噪声性听力损失识别的听力筛查标准比较
Am J Audiol. 2007 Dec;16(2):S190-202. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2007/023).
8
Hearing screening for Japanese children and young adults using the automated auditory brainstem response.使用自动听性脑干反应对日本儿童和年轻人进行听力筛查。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014 Feb;41(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
9
School hearing screening programme in the UK: practice and performance.英国的学校听力筛查项目:实践与成效
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Feb;90(2):154-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.046979.
10
Improving detection of adolescent hearing loss.提高青少年听力损失的检测率。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Dec;165(12):1094-100. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.188.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation Study of Kids Hearing Game: A Self-Administered Pediatric Audiology Application.儿童听力游戏验证研究:一种自主管理的儿科听力学应用。
Perm J. 2021 May;25. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.157.
2
How the World's Children Hear: A Narrative Review of School Hearing Screening Programs Globally.全球儿童的听力状况:关于全球学校听力筛查项目的叙述性综述
OTO Open. 2020 May 19;4(2):2473974X20923580. doi: 10.1177/2473974X20923580. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
3
Prevalence of hearing impairment amongst school going children in the rural field practice area of the institution.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.美国儿童和青少年肥胖率及体重指数趋势,1999-2010 年。
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.40. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
2
Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents.美国青少年听力损失的患病率变化。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):772-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1124.
3
Hearing assessment in infants and children: recommendations beyond neonatal screening.婴幼儿听力评估:新生儿筛查之外的建议
该机构农村实地实习地区学龄儿童听力障碍的患病率。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 2):1567-1571. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01651-9. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Hearing loss in Korean adolescents: The prevalence thereof and its association with leisure noise exposure.韩国青少年听力损失:其流行情况及其与休闲噪声暴露的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0209254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209254. eCollection 2019.
5
Missed opportunities: Do states require screening of children for health conditions that interfere with learning?
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 17;13(1):e0190254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190254. eCollection 2018.
6
Disparities in access to pediatric hearing health care.儿童听力保健服务可及性的差异。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct;25(5):359-364. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000388.
7
A Prevalence Study of Hearing Loss among Primary School Children in the South East of Iran.伊朗东南部小学生听力损失患病率研究
Int J Otolaryngol. 2013;2013:138935. doi: 10.1155/2013/138935. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):1252-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1997. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
4
Adolescents and MP3 players: too many risks, too few precautions.青少年与MP3播放器:风险诸多,防范太少。
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e953-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3179.
5
Noise-induced hearing loss in children: A 'less than silent' environmental danger.儿童噪声性听力损失:一种“并非悄无声息”的环境危险。
Paediatr Child Health. 2008 May;13(5):377-82. doi: 10.1093/pch/13.5.377.
6
Strategies for the prevention of MP3-induced hearing loss among adolescents: expert opinions from a Delphi study.预防青少年MP3所致听力损失的策略:德尔菲研究的专家意见
Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):1257-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2291.
7
Comparison of audiometric screening criteria for the identification of noise-induced hearing loss in adolescents.青少年噪声性听力损失识别的听力筛查标准比较
Am J Audiol. 2007 Dec;16(2):S190-202. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2007/023).
8
Determining the effect of newborn hearing screening legislation: an analysis of state hearing screening rates.确定新生儿听力筛查立法的影响:对各州听力筛查率的分析。
Public Health Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;122(2):198-205. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200209.
9
Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States.1988 - 1994年美国第三次全国健康与营养检查调查:6至19岁儿童中噪声性听力阈值偏移的估计患病率
Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):40-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.40.
10
Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.6至19岁儿童听力损失患病率:第三次全国健康与营养检查调查
JAMA. 1998 Apr 8;279(14):1071-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.14.1071.