• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良后的世界卫生组织手部消毒剂配方符合欧洲术前外科手准备的功效要求。

Modified World Health Organization hand rub formulations comply with European efficacy requirements for preoperative surgical hand preparations.

机构信息

Institute of Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):245-50. doi: 10.1086/669528. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1086/669528
PMID:23388358
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) has published "Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care" recommending 2 hand rub formulations based on 80% vol/vol ethanol or 75% vol/vol isopropanol for local production in healthcare settings where commercial products are not available or are too expensive. Previous investigations have shown that neither formulation meets the efficacy requirements of European norm (EN) 12791, which is the most stringent available norm for surgical hand rub preparations. Even when modified with approximately 5% higher alcohol content, the formulations proved to be inferior to the reference of the norm when measured after 3 hours.

OBJECTIVE

Because the high glycerol content of the formulations was suspected to negatively influence their efficacy, additional investigations were performed with varying glycerol content.

METHODS

Modified formulations with higher alcohol concentration (mass instead of volume percentage) and lower glycerol concentration (0.725% instead of 1.45%) or without the addition of glycerol were evaluated for their conformity with the efficacy requirements of EN 12791, which demands noninferiority in comparison with a reference hand antisepsis procedure immediately and 3 hours after treatment on volunteers' hands.

DESIGN

Randomized Latin-square design.

SETTING

Microbiology laboratory of the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Reducing the concentration of glycerol or omitting it completely rendered both WHO formulations noninferior to the reference, both immediately and 3 hours after surgical hand antisepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both WHO-recommended formulations meet the efficacy requirements of EN 12791 by increasing their alcohol concentrations by 5%, prolonging their application to 5 minutes and reducing the glycerol concentration to 0.725%.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)发布了“医疗卫生保健用手卫生指南”,推荐了两种基于 80%vol/vol 乙醇或 75%vol/vol 异丙醇的手揉搓制剂,用于在商业产品不可用或过于昂贵的医疗卫生保健环境中进行本地生产。之前的调查表明,这两种制剂均不符合欧洲标准(EN)12791 的功效要求,EN12791 是用于手术手揉搓制剂的最严格的现有标准。即使用大约 5%更高的酒精含量进行改良,在 3 小时后测量时,这些制剂的效果仍不如该标准的参考制剂。

目的

由于怀疑制剂中的高甘油含量会对其功效产生负面影响,因此进行了更多的调查,以研究不同的甘油含量。

方法

评估了具有更高酒精浓度(质量而非体积百分比)和更低甘油浓度(0.725%而非 1.45%)的改良制剂,或不添加甘油的制剂,以评估其是否符合 EN12791 的功效要求,该标准要求在志愿者手上进行即时和处理后 3 小时的治疗时,与参考手部消毒程序相比具有非劣效性。

设计

随机拉丁方设计。

地点

奥地利维也纳医科大学微生物学实验室。

参与者

25 名健康志愿者。

结果

降低甘油浓度或完全不添加甘油可使两种 WHO 制剂在即时和手术手消毒后 3 小时均与参考制剂具有非劣效性。

结论

通过将酒精浓度提高 5%、将应用时间延长至 5 分钟并将甘油浓度降低至 0.725%,两种 WHO 推荐的制剂均符合 EN12791 的功效要求。

相似文献

1
Modified World Health Organization hand rub formulations comply with European efficacy requirements for preoperative surgical hand preparations.改良后的世界卫生组织手部消毒剂配方符合欧洲术前外科手准备的功效要求。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):245-50. doi: 10.1086/669528. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
2
Testing of the World Health Organization-recommended formulations for surgical hand preparation and proposals for increased efficacy.世界卫生组织推荐的手术手部准备制剂的测试和提高功效的建议。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Oct;79(2):115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
3
Testing of the World Health Organization recommended formulations in their application as hygienic hand rubs and proposals for increased efficacy.测试世界卫生组织推荐配方在卫生手消毒剂中的应用及其增强功效的建议。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):328-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
4
World Health Organization-recommended hand-rub formulations do not meet European efficacy requirements for surgical hand disinfection in five minutes.世界卫生组织推荐的手消毒剂配方不符合欧洲 5 分钟外科手消毒的功效要求。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jun;78(2):123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
5
Efficacies of the original and modified World Health Organization-recommended hand-rub formulations.原始和改良的世界卫生组织推荐的手部搓揉制剂的功效。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Oct;106(2):264-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Population kinetics of the skin flora on gloved hands following surgical hand disinfection with 3 propanol-based hand rubs: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.使用三种基于丙醇的手消毒剂进行外科手消毒后戴手套手上皮肤菌群的群体动力学:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):346-50. doi: 10.1086/510865. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
7
Ethanol in pre-surgical hand rubs: concentration and duration of application for achieving European Norm EN 12791.术前手部擦拭用乙醇:达到欧洲标准 EN 12791 所需的浓度和应用持续时间。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Mar;77(3):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
8
Evaluation of World Health Organization-Recommended Hand Hygiene Formulations.世界卫生组织推荐的手部卫生制剂评估。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;26(9):2064-2068. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.201761. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Surgical hand antisepsis with alcohol-based hand rub: comparison of effectiveness after 1.5 and 3 minutes of application.使用含酒精洗手液进行外科洗手消毒:1.5分钟和3分钟涂抹后的效果比较
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 May;30(5):420-6. doi: 10.1086/596772.
10
Surgical hand rub: Influence of duration of application on the immediate and 3-hours effects of n-propanol and isopropanol.外科洗手:涂抹时间对正丙醇和异丙醇即时及3小时效果的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2009 May;37(4):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.09.026. Epub 2009 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of surgical site infections after cervical spine surgery: results of a single-center cohort study adhering to multimodal preventive wound control protocol.颈椎手术后手术部位感染的发生率:遵循多模式预防性伤口控制方案的单中心队列研究结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1997-2004. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03379-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2: A Review.消毒剂抗 SARS-CoV-2:综述。
Viruses. 2022 Aug 4;14(8):1721. doi: 10.3390/v14081721.
3
In Vitro Evaluation of the Virucidal Activity of Different Povidone-Iodine Formulations Against Murine and Human Coronaviruses.
不同聚维酮碘制剂对鼠源和人源冠状病毒的杀病毒活性的体外评估
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):2777-2790. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00536-1. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Canadian policy changes for alcohol-based hand rubs during the COVID-19 pandemic and unintended risks.加拿大在新冠疫情期间针对含酒精洗手液的政策变化及意外风险。
World Med Health Policy. 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.463.
5
Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers in COVID-19 Prevention: A Multidimensional Perspective.基于酒精的手部消毒剂在 COVID-19 预防中的多维视角
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Mar 19;9(1):64. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010064.
6
Alcohol-based hand sanitisers as first line of defence against SARS-CoV-2: a review of biology, chemistry and formulations.含酒精的手部消毒剂作为对抗 SARS-CoV-2 的第一道防线:生物学、化学和配方综述。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Sep 29;148:e229. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002319.
7
Efficacies of the original and modified World Health Organization-recommended hand-rub formulations.原始和改良的世界卫生组织推荐的手部搓揉制剂的功效。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Oct;106(2):264-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Evaluation of World Health Organization-Recommended Hand Hygiene Formulations.世界卫生组织推荐的手部卫生制剂评估。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;26(9):2064-2068. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.201761. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
COVID-19-associated shortage of alcohol-based hand rubs, face masks, medical gloves, and gowns: proposal for a risk-adapted approach to ensure patient and healthcare worker safety.COVID-19 相关的酒精免洗洗手液、口罩、医用手套和手术衣短缺:确保患者和医护人员安全的风险适应方法建议。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jul;105(3):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.041. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
Inactivation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 by WHO-Recommended Hand Rub Formulations and Alcohols.世卫组织推荐的手部消毒剂配方和醇类对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的灭活作用。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1592-1595. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200915. Epub 2020 Jun 21.