• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 15-G 章鱼®在猪肝脏中射频消融的体内效率和安全性。

Evaluation of the in vivo efficiency and safety of hepatic radiofrequency ablation using a 15-G Octopus® in pig liver.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2013 Mar-Apr;14(2):194-201. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.194. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.194
PMID:23482995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3590330/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine in vivo efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in porcine liver by using 15-gauge Octopus® (15-G Octopus®) electrodes to create a large coagulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 18 coagulations were created by using a 180-W generator and 15-G Octopus® electrodes during laparotomy, performed in 14 pigs. Coagulation necrosis was created in the pig livers by the use of one of three RFA protocols: 1) group A, monopolar RFA using a 15-G Octopus® electrode with a 5-mm inter-electrode distance (n = 4); 2) group B, monopolar RFA using a 15-G Octopus® electrode with a 10-mm inter-electrode distance (n = 6); and 3) group C, switching monopolar RFA using two 15-G Octopus® electrodes (n = 8). The energy efficiency, shape, maximum and minimum diameters (Dmx and Dmi), and the volume of the coagulation volume were measured in each group. The Summary statistics were obtained and Mann-Whitney test was were performed.

RESULTS

The mean ablated volume of each group was 49.23 cm(3) in A, 64.11 cm(3) in B, and 72.35 cm(3) in C. The mean Dmx and Dmi values were 5.68 cm and 4.58 cm in A and 5.97 cm and 4.97 cm in B, respectively. In group C, the mean diameters of Dmx and Dmi were 6.80 cm and 5.11 cm, respectively. The mean ratios of Dmi/Dmx were 1.25, 1.20, and 1.35 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. There was one animal death during the RFA procedure, the cause of which could not be subsequently determined. However, there were no other significant, procedure-related complications during the seven-hour-delayed CT scans.

CONCLUSION

RFA procedures using 15-G Octopus® electrodes are useful and safe for creating a large ablation in a single electrode model as well as in the multiple electrodes model.

摘要

目的

使用 15 号八角针(15-G Octopus®)电极在猪肝脏内进行射频消融(RFA),以确定其体内疗效,从而产生大的凝固区。

材料和方法

在 14 头猪的剖腹手术中,使用 180-W 发生器和 15-G Octopus®电极共创建了 18 个凝固区。通过使用三种 RFA 方案之一在猪肝脏中产生凝固性坏死:1)组 A,使用 5-mm 电极间距的 15-G Octopus®单极 RFA(n = 4);2)组 B,使用 10-mm 电极间距的 15-G Octopus®单极 RFA(n = 6);和 3)组 C,使用两个 15-G Octopus®电极切换单极 RFA(n = 8)。在每组中测量能量效率、形状、最大和最小直径(Dmx 和 Dmi)以及凝固体积。获得汇总统计数据并进行了 Mann-Whitney 检验。

结果

A 组每个消融区域的平均消融体积为 49.23cm³,B 组为 64.11cm³,C 组为 72.35cm³。A 组和 B 组的平均 Dmx 和 Dmi 值分别为 5.68cm 和 4.58cm,Dmx 和 Dmi 值分别为 5.97cm 和 4.97cm。C 组的平均 Dmx 和 Dmi 值分别为 6.80cm 和 5.11cm,Dmi/Dmx 的平均比值分别为 1.25、1.20 和 1.35。在 RFA 过程中有一只动物死亡,其原因无法确定。然而,在七小时延迟 CT 扫描过程中,没有其他与程序相关的重大并发症。

结论

使用 15-G Octopus®电极的 RFA 程序在单电极模型和多电极模型中创建大的消融区域是有用且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/3590330/bd20dc68f929/kjr-14-194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/3590330/9d5b2c30da21/kjr-14-194-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/3590330/bd20dc68f929/kjr-14-194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/3590330/9d5b2c30da21/kjr-14-194-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/3590330/bd20dc68f929/kjr-14-194-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the in vivo efficiency and safety of hepatic radiofrequency ablation using a 15-G Octopus® in pig liver.评估 15-G 章鱼®在猪肝脏中射频消融的体内效率和安全性。
Korean J Radiol. 2013 Mar-Apr;14(2):194-201. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.194. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
2
Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablations using Octopus® electrodes in an in vivo porcine liver model.应用 Octopus® 电极在活体猪肝脏模型中进行多电极射频消融。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e609-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/61619687. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
3
Hepatic radiofrequency ablation using multiple probes: ex vivo and in vivo comparative studies of monopolar versus multipolar modes.使用多探头的肝脏射频消融:单极与多极模式的离体和在体比较研究
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Apr-Jun;7(2):106-17. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.2.106.
4
Dual switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode: comparison with consecutive and switching monopolar modes in ex vivo bovine livers.使用可分离集束电极的双切换单极射频消融:与离体牛肝中连续和切换单极模式的比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):403-11. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.3.403. Epub 2013 May 2.
5
Switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation technique using multiple, internally cooled electrodes and a multichannel generator: ex vivo and in vivo pilot study.使用多个内部冷却电极和多通道发生器的切换单极射频消融技术:离体和体内初步研究。
Invest Radiol. 2007 Mar;42(3):163-71. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000252495.44818.b3.
6
Switching bipolar hepatic radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes: comparison with consecutive monopolar and switching monopolar modes.使用内部冷却湿电极的双极肝脏射频消融术:与连续单极和切换单极模式的比较。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Jun;88(1050):20140468. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140468. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a dual-switching system and a separable clustered electrode: evaluation of the in vivo efficiency.使用双切换系统和可分离集束电极的单极射频消融:体内效率评估。
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):235-44. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.235. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
Saline-enhanced hepatic radiofrequency ablation using a perfused-cooled electrode: comparison of dual probe bipolar mode with monopolar and single probe bipolar modes.使用灌注冷却电极的盐水增强型肝脏射频消融:双探针双极模式与单极和单探针双极模式的比较
Korean J Radiol. 2004 Apr-Jun;5(2):121-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.2.121.
9
An ex-vivo experimental study on optimization of bipolar radiofrequency liver ablation using perfusion-cooled electrodes.使用灌注冷却电极优化双极射频肝消融的体外实验研究。
Acta Radiol. 2005 Aug;46(5):443-51. doi: 10.1080/02841850510021418.
10
Comparison of Ablation Performance between Octopus Multipurpose Electrode and Conventional Octopus Electrode.比较章鱼多功能电极和传统章鱼电极的消融性能。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Feb;24(2):86-94. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0600.

引用本文的文献

1
No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers.使用多电极的非接触式射频消融:猪肝脏中切换单极与切换双极模式的体内比较研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0176350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176350. eCollection 2017.
2
No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Bovine Liver.非接触式射频消融:牛肝脏中双极切换与单极切换消融的比较
Korean J Radiol. 2017 Mar-Apr;18(2):279-288. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.279. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
3
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: How We Do It Safely and Completely.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of arsenic trioxide on radiofrequency ablation of VX2 liver tumor: intraarterial versus intravenous administration.三氧化二砷对兔 VX2 肝癌射频消融后影响的比较:经肝动脉与经静脉给药途径。
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;13(2):195-201. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.195. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
2
Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablations using Octopus® electrodes in an in vivo porcine liver model.应用 Octopus® 电极在活体猪肝脏模型中进行多电极射频消融。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e609-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/61619687. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
3
An overview of evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
超声引导下经皮肝肿瘤射频消融术:我们如何安全、彻底地进行
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;16(6):1226-39. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1226. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Technical development of a new semispherical radiofrequency bipolar device (RONJA): ex vivo and in vivo studies.一种新型半球形射频双极设备(RONJA)的技术开发:体外和体内研究
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:532792. doi: 10.1155/2014/532792. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
5
Comparison of therapeutic efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas between internally cooled 15-G and 17-G single electrodes.内部冷却 15-G 和 17-G 单电极射频消融治疗肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性比较。
Br J Radiol. 2014 Apr;87(1036):20130534. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130534.
6
Monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a dual-switching system and a separable clustered electrode: evaluation of the in vivo efficiency.使用双切换系统和可分离集束电极的单极射频消融:体内效率评估。
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):235-44. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.235. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
肝细胞癌循证管理概述:一项荟萃分析
J Cancer Res Ther. 2011 Oct-Dec;7(4):463-75. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.92023.
4
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with multiple electrodes for medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas.经皮射频消融多电极治疗中等大小肝癌。
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;13(1):34-43. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.34. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
5
Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 10-year outcome and prognostic factors.射频消融治疗肝细胞癌:10 年结果和预后因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;107(4):569-77; quiz 578. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.425. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
6
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas adjacent to the gallbladder with internally cooled electrodes: assessment of safety and therapeutic efficacy.使用内部冷却电极经皮射频消融治疗胆囊旁肝细胞癌:安全性和治疗效果评估
Korean J Radiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;10(4):366-76. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.4.366. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
7
Switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation technique using multiple, internally cooled electrodes and a multichannel generator: ex vivo and in vivo pilot study.使用多个内部冷却电极和多通道发生器的切换单极射频消融技术:离体和体内初步研究。
Invest Radiol. 2007 Mar;42(3):163-71. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000252495.44818.b3.
8
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA): development of a flow model for bovine livers for extensive bench testing.射频消融(RFA):用于广泛的实验台测试的牛肝血流模型的开发。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):1068-72. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-0338-4.
9
Hepatic radiofrequency ablation using multiple probes: ex vivo and in vivo comparative studies of monopolar versus multipolar modes.使用多探头的肝脏射频消融:单极与多极模式的离体和在体比较研究
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Apr-Jun;7(2):106-17. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.2.106.
10
Radiofrequency ablation of the porcine liver in vivo: increased coagulation with an internally cooled perfusion electrode.猪肝脏的体内射频消融:使用内部冷却灌注电极增强凝血效果。
Acad Radiol. 2006 Mar;13(3):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.10.020.