• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较章鱼多功能电极和传统章鱼电极的消融性能。

Comparison of Ablation Performance between Octopus Multipurpose Electrode and Conventional Octopus Electrode.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2023 Feb;24(2):86-94. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0600.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2022.0600
PMID:36725351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9892219/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare Octopus multipurpose (MP) electrodes, which are capable of saline instillation and direct tissue temperature measurement, and conventional electrodes for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in porcine livers .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen pigs were used in this study. In the first experiment, RFA was performed in the liver for 6 minutes using Octopus MP electrodes (n = 15 ablation zones) and conventional electrodes (n = 12 ablation zones) to investigate the effect of saline instillation. The ablation energy, electrical impedance, and ablation volume of the two electrodes were compared. In the second experiment, RFA was performed near the gallbladder (GB) and colon using Octopus MP electrodes (n = 12 ablation zones for each) with direct tissue temperature monitoring and conventional electrodes (n = 11 ablation zones for each). RFA was discontinued when the temperature increased to > 60\xe2\x84\x83 in the Octopus MP electrode group, whereas RFA was performed for a total of 6 minutes in the conventional electrode group. Thermal injury was assessed and compared between the two groups by pathological examination.

RESULTS

In the first experiment, the ablation volume and total energy delivered in the Octopus MP electrode group were significantly larger than those in the conventional electrode group (15.7 ± 4.26 cm vs. 12.5 ± 2.14 cm, = 0.027; 5.48 ± 0.49 Kcal vs. 5.04 ± 0.49 Kcal, = 0.029). In the second experiment, thermal injury to the GB and colon was less frequently noted in the Octopus MP electrode group than that in the conventional electrode group (16.7% [2/12] vs. 90.9% [10/11] for GB and 8.3% [1/12] vs. 90.9% [10/11] for colon, < 0.001 for all). The total energy delivered around the GB (2.65 ± 1.07 Kcal vs. 5.04 ± 0.66 Kcal) and colon (2.58 ± 0.57 Kcal vs. 5.17 ± 0.90 Kcal) were significantly lower in the Octopus MP electrode group than that in the conventional electrode group ( < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

RFA using the Octopus MP electrodes induced a larger ablation volume and resulted in less thermal injury to the adjacent organs compared with conventional electrodes.

摘要

目的

比较章鱼多功能(MP)电极,其能够盐水灌注和直接组织温度测量,并在猪肝脏的射频消融(RFA)常规电极。

材料与方法

本研究使用了 16 头猪。在第一个实验中,使用 Octopus MP 电极(n = 15 消融区)和常规电极(n = 12 消融区)在肝脏中进行 6 分钟的 RFA,以研究盐水灌注的效果。比较了两种电极的消融能量、电阻和消融体积。在第二个实验中,使用 Octopus MP 电极(n = 12 个消融区)直接组织温度监测和常规电极(n = 11 个消融区)在胆囊(GB)和结肠附近进行 RFA。当 Octopus MP 电极组的温度升高到> 60℃时,停止 RFA,而常规电极组总共进行 6 分钟的 RFA。通过病理检查比较两组之间的热损伤。

结果

在第一个实验中,Octopus MP 电极组的消融体积和总能量明显大于常规电极组(15.7 ± 4.26 cm 比 12.5 ± 2.14 cm, = 0.027;5.48 ± 0.49 Kcal 比 5.04 ± 0.49 Kcal, = 0.029)。在第二个实验中,Octopus MP 电极组对 GB 和结肠的热损伤较常规电极组少(GB 为 16.7%[2/12],常规电极组为 90.9%[10/11];结肠为 8.3%[1/12],常规电极组为 90.9%[10/11],所有 < 0.001)。GB 周围的总能量(2.65 ± 1.07 Kcal 比 5.04 ± 0.66 Kcal)和结肠(2.58 ± 0.57 Kcal 比 5.17 ± 0.90 Kcal)的传递量Octopus MP 电极组明显低于常规电极组(所有 < 0.001)。

结论

与常规电极相比,使用 Octopus MP 电极进行 RFA 可产生更大的消融体积,并减少对邻近器官的热损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/9a3e51f1934c/kjr-24-86-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/12faba49847f/kjr-24-86-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/f0b562f109bd/kjr-24-86-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/4162abcec289/kjr-24-86-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/9a3e51f1934c/kjr-24-86-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/12faba49847f/kjr-24-86-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/f0b562f109bd/kjr-24-86-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/4162abcec289/kjr-24-86-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941e/9892219/9a3e51f1934c/kjr-24-86-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Ablation Performance between Octopus Multipurpose Electrode and Conventional Octopus Electrode.比较章鱼多功能电极和传统章鱼电极的消融性能。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Feb;24(2):86-94. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0600.
2
Dual switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode: comparison with consecutive and switching monopolar modes in ex vivo bovine livers.使用可分离集束电极的双切换单极射频消融:与离体牛肝中连续和切换单极模式的比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):403-11. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.3.403. Epub 2013 May 2.
3
Evaluation of the in vivo efficiency and safety of hepatic radiofrequency ablation using a 15-G Octopus® in pig liver.评估 15-G 章鱼®在猪肝脏中射频消融的体内效率和安全性。
Korean J Radiol. 2013 Mar-Apr;14(2):194-201. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.194. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
4
Ex vivo experiment of saline-enhanced hepatic bipolar radiofrequency ablation with a perfused needle electrode: comparison with conventional monopolar and simultaneous monopolar modes.灌注针电极盐水增强型肝脏双极射频消融的离体实验:与传统单极和同步单极模式的比较
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005 May-Jun;28(3):338-45. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-0177-3.
5
Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablations using Octopus® electrodes in an in vivo porcine liver model.应用 Octopus® 电极在活体猪肝脏模型中进行多电极射频消融。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e609-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/61619687. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
6
Hepatic radiofrequency ablation using multiple probes: ex vivo and in vivo comparative studies of monopolar versus multipolar modes.使用多探头的肝脏射频消融:单极与多极模式的离体和在体比较研究
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Apr-Jun;7(2):106-17. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.2.106.
7
Monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a dual-switching system and a separable clustered electrode: evaluation of the in vivo efficiency.使用双切换系统和可分离集束电极的单极射频消融:体内效率评估。
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):235-44. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.235. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers.使用多电极的非接触式射频消融:猪肝脏中切换单极与切换双极模式的体内比较研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0176350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176350. eCollection 2017.
9
An ex-vivo experimental study on optimization of bipolar radiofrequency liver ablation using perfusion-cooled electrodes.使用灌注冷却电极优化双极射频肝消融的体外实验研究。
Acta Radiol. 2005 Aug;46(5):443-51. doi: 10.1080/02841850510021418.
10
Optimization of wet radiofrequency ablation using a perfused-cooled electrode: a comparative study in ex vivo bovine livers.使用灌注冷却电极优化湿式射频消融:在离体牛肝脏中的比较研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2004 Oct-Dec;5(4):250-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.250.

本文引用的文献

1
No-Touch vs. Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation Using Twin Internally Cooled Wet Electrodes for Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study.使用双极内部冷却湿电极的无接触与常规射频消融治疗小肝细胞癌的随机前瞻性比较研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Dec;22(12):1974-1984. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0319. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
Outcome of No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Clinical Trial.无接触射频消融治疗小肝癌的疗效:多中心临床试验。
Radiology. 2021 Oct;301(1):229-236. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210309. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Early experience with laparoscopic treatment of liver tumors using a separable cluster electrode with a no-touch technique.
使用可分离簇状电极及非接触技术进行腹腔镜治疗肝肿瘤的早期经验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):76-82. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.95065. Epub 2020 May 10.
4
Directional ablation in radiofrequency ablation using a multi-tine electrode functioning in multipolar mode: An in-silico study using a finite set of states.使用在多极模式下运行的多尖电极进行射频消融中的定向消融:一项使用有限状态集的计算机模拟研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Nov;126:104007. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104007. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Whole tumor ablation of locally recurred hepatocellular carcinoma including retained iodized oil after transarterial chemoembolization improves progression-free survival.经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)后碘油残留的局部复发性肝细胞癌的全肿瘤消融可改善无进展生存期。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):5052-5062. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5993-y. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
Comparison of switching bipolar ablation with multiple cooled wet electrodes and switching monopolar ablation with separable clustered electrode in treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial.采用多个冷却湿电极的双极消融切换与采用可分离簇状电极的单极消融切换治疗小肝细胞癌的比较:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192173. eCollection 2018.
7
Perfused hypertonic-saline-augmented needle enlarges ablation zones in porcine livers.灌注高渗盐水增强针可扩大猪肝脏的消融区域。
Oncol Lett. 2018 Jan;15(1):972-978. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7352. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Hepatic Lesions Adjacent to Gallbladder: Reconfiguration of the Ablation Zone through Probe Relocation and Ablation Time Reduction.胆囊旁肝局灶性病变射频消融的疗效与安全性:通过探头重新定位和缩短消融时间对消融区进行重新塑形
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1395-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
9
Loco-regional therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: Selecting an optimal therapy.等待肝移植的肝细胞癌患者的局部区域治疗:选择最佳治疗方法。
World J Transplant. 2016 Jun 24;6(2):306-13. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.306.
10
Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.图像引导下的肿瘤消融:术语和报告标准的标准化——十年更新
Radiology. 2014 Oct;273(1):241-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132958. Epub 2014 Jun 13.