Comparative Biology Centre, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
BMC Vet Res. 2013 Mar 13;9:48. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-48.
Medetomidine-ketamine (MK) and dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) are widely used to provide general anaesthesia in laboratory animals, but have not been compared directly in many of these species, including rodents. This study aimed to compare the onset and depth of anaesthesia, and changes in vital signs, after intraperitoneal (IP) or subcutaneous (SC) administration of ketamine (75 mg kg(-1)) combined with medetomidine (1 mg kg(-1)) or dexmedetomidine (0.5 mg kg(-1)) using a randomised semi-crossover design with ≥ 48 hours between treatments in 10 male and 10 female mice. Each mouse was anaesthetised twice using the same administration route (IP or SC): once with each drug-ketamine combination. Anaesthetised mice were monitored on a heating pad without supplemental oxygen for 89 minutes; atipamezole was administered for reversal. The times that the righting reflex was lost post-injection and returned post-reversal were analysed using general linear models. Tail-pinch and pedal reflexes were examined using binomial generalized linear models. Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (fr), and arterial haemoglobin saturation (S(p)O2) were compared using generalized additive mixed models.
There were no significant differences among treatments for the times taken for loss and return of the righting reflex, or response of the tail-pinch reflex. The pedal withdrawal reflex was abolished more frequently with MK than DK over time (P = 0.021). The response of PR and S(p)O2 were similar among treatments, but fr was significantly higher with MK than DK (P ≤ 0.0005). Markedly low S(p)O2 concentrations occurred within 5 minutes post-injection (83.8 ± 6.7%) in all treatment groups and were most severe after 89 minutes lapsed (66.7 ± 7.5%). No statistical differences were detected in regards to administration route (P ≤ 0.94).
This study failed to demonstrate clinical advantages of the enantiomer dexmedetomidine over medetomidine when combined with ketamine to produce general anaesthesia in mice. At the doses administered, deep surgical anaesthesia was not consistently produced with either combination; therefore, anaesthetic depth must be assessed before performing surgical procedures. Supplemental oxygen should always be provided during anaesthesia to prevent hypoxaemia.
在实验室动物中,咪达唑仑-氯胺酮(MK)和右美托咪定-氯胺酮(DK)广泛用于提供全身麻醉,但在许多这些物种中,包括啮齿动物,尚未直接比较过。本研究旨在使用随机半交叉设计比较腹腔内(IP)或皮下(SC)给予氯胺酮(75mgkg-1)联合咪达唑仑(1mgkg-1)或右美托咪定(0.5mgkg-1)后麻醉的开始和深度,并观察生命体征的变化,每种药物-氯胺酮组合在 10 只雄性和 10 只雌性小鼠中至少相隔 48 小时进行两次麻醉。每只小鼠使用相同的给药途径(IP 或 SC)接受两次麻醉:一次用每种药物-氯胺酮组合。麻醉后的小鼠在加热垫上监测,不补充氧气,持续 89 分钟;给予阿替美唑逆转。使用一般线性模型分析注射后失去和恢复翻正反射的时间。使用二项式广义线性模型检查尾巴捏和足反射。使用广义加性混合模型比较脉搏率(PR)、呼吸频率(fr)和动脉血红蛋白饱和度(S(p)O2)。
在失去和恢复翻正反射的时间以及尾巴捏反射的反应方面,各组治疗之间没有显著差异。随着时间的推移,MK 比 DK 更频繁地消除了足反射(P = 0.021)。PR 和 S(p)O2 的反应在治疗组之间相似,但 MK 比 DK 的 fr 显著更高(P≤0.0005)。所有治疗组在注射后 5 分钟内 S(p)O2 浓度明显降低(83.8±6.7%),89 分钟后最严重(66.7±7.5%)。在给药途径方面未检测到统计学差异(P≤0.94)。
本研究未能证明右旋美托咪定与氯胺酮联合使用产生全身麻醉时,与咪达唑仑相比具有临床优势。在给予的剂量下,两种组合均未产生深度手术麻醉;因此,在进行手术前必须评估麻醉深度。麻醉期间应始终提供补充氧气,以防止低氧血症。