• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证《世界卫生组织残疾评定量表儿童版(WHODAS-Child)》在卢旺达的适用性。

Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for children, WHODAS-Child" in Rwanda.

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057725. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0057725
PMID:23505437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3591425/
Abstract

OVERVIEW

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for children (WHODAS-Child) is a disability assessment instrument based on the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for children and youth. It is modified from the original adult version specifically for use with children. The aim of this study was to assess the WHODAS-Child structure and metric properties in a community sample of children with and without reported psychosocial problems in rural Rwanda.

METHODS

The WHODAS-Child was first translated into Kinyarwanda through a detailed committee translation process and back-translation. Cognitive interviewing was used to assess the comprehension of the translated items. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a group of 64 children. The translated WHODAS-Child was then administered to a final sample of 367 children in southern Kayonza district in rural southeastern Rwanda within a larger psychosocial assessment battery. The latent structure was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was evaluated in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability (Pearson's correlation coefficient). Construct validity was explored by examining convergence between WHODAS-Child scores and mental disorder status, and divergence of WHODAS-Child scores with protective factors and prosocial behaviors. Concordance between parent and child scores was also assessed.

RESULTS

The six-factor structure of the WHODAS-Child was confirmed in a population sample of Rwandan children. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were high (r = .83 and ICC = .88). WHODAS-Child scores were moderately positively correlated with presence of depression (r = .42, p<.001) and post-traumatic stress disorder (r = .31, p<.001) and moderately negatively correlated with prosocial behaviors (r = .47, p<.001). The Kinyarwanda version of the WHODAS-Child was found to be a reliable and acceptable self-report tool for assessment of functional impairment among children largely referred for psychosocial problems in the study district in rural Rwanda. Further research in low-resource settings and with more general populations is recommended.

摘要

概述

世界卫生组织残疾评定量表儿童版(WHODAS-Child)是一种残疾评定工具,基于世界卫生组织针对儿童和青少年的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》。它是从原始的成人版专门为儿童使用而修改的。本研究的目的是评估 WHODAS-Child 在卢旺达农村一个有和没有报告心理社会问题的社区样本儿童中的结构和度量属性。

方法

首先通过详细的委员会翻译过程和回译将 WHODAS-Child 翻译成基尼亚卢旺达语。认知访谈用于评估翻译项目的理解情况。在 64 名儿童中评估了测试-重测信度。在卢旺达东南部农村卡永扎区南部的最后一个 367 名儿童样本中,对翻译后的 WHODAS-Child 进行了测试。通过验证性因素分析评估潜在结构。通过内部一致性(克朗巴赫α)和测试-重测信度(皮尔逊相关系数)评估信度。通过检查 WHODAS-Child 分数与精神障碍状况的收敛性以及 WHODAS-Child 分数与保护因素和亲社会行为的发散性来探索结构效度。还评估了父母和孩子分数之间的一致性。

结果

WHODAS-Child 的六因素结构在卢旺达儿童的人群样本中得到了确认。测试-重测和评分者间信度都很高(r=0.83,ICC=0.88)。WHODAS-Child 分数与抑郁(r=0.42,p<.001)和创伤后应激障碍(r=0.31,p<.001)的存在呈中度正相关,与亲社会行为(r=0.47,p<.001)呈中度负相关。在卢旺达农村研究地区,基尼亚卢旺达语版 WHODAS-Child 被认为是一种可靠且可接受的自我报告工具,用于评估儿童的功能障碍,这些儿童主要是因心理社会问题而接受评估。建议在资源较少的环境中和更广泛的人群中进一步开展研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de5c/3591425/e30f486bb3e2/pone.0057725.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de5c/3591425/e30f486bb3e2/pone.0057725.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de5c/3591425/e30f486bb3e2/pone.0057725.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for children, WHODAS-Child" in Rwanda.验证《世界卫生组织残疾评定量表儿童版(WHODAS-Child)》在卢旺达的适用性。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057725. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
2
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): development and validation of the Nigerian Igbo version in patients with chronic low back pain.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS 2.0):尼日利亚伊博语版本在慢性下腰痛患者中的开发与验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 17;21(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03763-8.
3
WHODAS-Child: psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 for children and youth among Italian children with autism spectrum disorder.WHODAS-Child:WHODAS 2.0 在意大利自闭症谱系障碍儿童中的心理测量特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 May;45(10):1713-1719. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2071481. Epub 2022 May 8.
4
Development and validation of the World Health Organization disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Indonesian version in stroke survivors.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)印度尼西亚语版本在中风幸存者中的开发与验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4459-4466. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1900413. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在有手部损伤和无手部损伤的希伯来语使用者中的跨文化调适
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1189606. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
6
Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases.验证《世界卫生组织残疾评定量表》(WHODAS-2)在慢性病患者中的适用性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 May 19;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-51.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population.WHODAS 2.0 的心理测量学评估及瑞典普通人群残疾的流行率。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Apr 5;7(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00580-0.
8
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表在埃塞俄比亚农村重症精神障碍患者中的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 5;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0647-3.
9
Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal.适应世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 用于尼泊尔。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Mar 17;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00550-5.
10
Measuring functional disability in children with developmental disorders in low-resource settings: validation of Developmental Disorders-Children Disability Assessment Schedule (DD-CDAS) in rural Pakistan.在资源匮乏地区测量发育障碍儿童的功能残疾:《发育障碍-儿童残疾评估量表》(DD-CDAS)在巴基斯坦农村地区的效度验证
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2020 Jul 13;7:e17. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2020.10. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Health status of adults exposed to severe acute malnutrition during childhood in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: the Lwiro cohort study.刚果民主共和国东部儿童期暴露于严重急性营养不良的成年人的健康状况:卢伊罗队列研究
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;3(1):e001510. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001510. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation of the World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for children with mental disorders in specialized health-care services.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0在专业医疗服务中用于精神障碍儿童的效度验证。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;15:1415133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1415133. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Validating the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children in Rwanda.验证《流行病学研究中心儿童抑郁量表》在卢旺达的适用性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;51(12):1284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
2
Conducting cognitive interviews in cross-national settings.在跨国背景下进行认知访谈。
Assessment. 2014 Apr;21(2):227-40. doi: 10.1177/1073191112436671. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
3
Nothing can defeat combined hands (Abashize hamwe ntakibananira): protective processes and resilience in Rwandan children and families affected by HIV/AIDS.
War-Affected South Sudanese in Settings of Preflight, Flight, and Resettlement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Trauma-Associated Mental Disorders.
受战争影响的南苏丹人在飞行前、飞行中和重新安置阶段:创伤相关精神障碍的系统评价和荟萃分析
Glob Soc Welf. 2024 Sep;11(3):193-210. doi: 10.1007/s40609-022-00227-w. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
4
Delivering therapy over telephone in a humanitarian setting: a pilot randomized controlled trial of common elements treatment approach (CETA) with Syrian refugee children in Lebanon.在人道主义环境中通过电话提供治疗:对黎巴嫩叙利亚难民儿童采用共同要素治疗法(CETA)的一项试点随机对照试验。
Confl Health. 2024 Sep 20;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00616-2.
5
[A global core outcome measurement set for snakebite clinical trials].[蛇咬伤临床试验的全球核心结局指标集]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Sep 5;3(3). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i3.2023.421. eCollection 2023 Sep 30.
6
Functioning among persons with lower limb amputation with or without prostheses in Rwanda.卢旺达下肢截肢者(无论是否佩戴假肢)的功能状况。
Afr J Disabil. 2023 Oct 17;12:1193. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1193. eCollection 2023.
7
CARIBOU-1: A pilot controlled trial of an Integrated Care Pathway for the treatment of depression in adolescents.CARIBOU-1:一项针对青少年抑郁症治疗的综合护理路径的试点对照试验。
JCPP Adv. 2022 May 27;2(2):e12083. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12083. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Camouflaging in Autism: Age Effects and Cross-Cultural Validation of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (CAT-Q).自闭症伪装:伪装自闭症特质问卷(CAT-Q)的年龄效应和跨文化验证。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 May;54(5):1749-1764. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05909-8. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
9
A global core outcome measurement set for snakebite clinical trials.全球蛇伤临床试验核心结局测量集。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Feb;11(2):e296-e300. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00479-X.
10
The status and use of prosthetic devices by persons with lower limb amputation in Rwanda.卢旺达下肢截肢者使用假肢装置的现状与情况
Afr J Disabil. 2022 Dec 9;11:1081. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v11i0.1081. eCollection 2022.
众志成城(Abashize hamwe ntakibananira):在 HIV/AIDS 影响下的卢旺达儿童和家庭中的保护过程和适应力。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(5):693-701. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.053. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
4
Validation of cross-cultural child mental health and psychosocial research instruments: adapting the Depression Self-Rating Scale and Child PTSD Symptom Scale in Nepal.验证跨文化儿童心理健康和心理社会研究工具:在尼泊尔调整抑郁自评量表和儿童 PTSD 症状量表。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 4;11(1):127. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-127.
5
Understanding locally, culturally, and contextually relevant mental health problems among Rwandan children and adolescents affected by HIV/AIDS.了解受艾滋病毒/艾滋病影响的卢旺达儿童和青少年中与当地、文化和背景相关的心理健康问题。
AIDS Care. 2011 Apr;23(4):401-12. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.516333.
6
Childhood adversities of populations living in low-income countries: prevalence, characteristics, and mental health consequences.生活在低收入国家的人群的童年逆境:流行率、特征和心理健康后果。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;23(4):356-62. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833ad79b.
7
Measurement validity in cross-cultural comparative research.跨文化比较研究中的测量效度。
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2008 Jul-Sep;17(3):211-20. doi: 10.1017/s1121189x00001305.
8
Modified WHODAS-II provides valid measure of global disability but filter items increased skewness.改良版世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)能有效衡量整体残疾状况,但筛选项目增加了偏度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1132-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
9
Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge.年轻人的心理健康:一项全球公共卫生挑战。
Lancet. 2007 Apr 14;369(9569):1302-1313. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60368-7.
10
Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales.影响儿童自我报告与家长代理报告在儿童生活质量量表4.0(PedsQL)通用核心量表上一致性的因素。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 30;4:58. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-58.