• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

KINDL问卷在巴西针对12至16岁青少年的文化适应性与效度验证。

Cultural adaptation and validation of the KINDL questionnaire in Brazil for adolescents between 12 and 16 years of age.

作者信息

Teixeira Inaian Pignatti, Novais Iane de Paiva, Pinto Rogério de Melo Costa, Cheik Nadia Carla

机构信息

School of Physical Education, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;15(4):845-57. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2012000400015.

DOI:10.1590/s1415-790x2012000400015
PMID:23515779
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Obtain a Portuguese version of the Kiddo-KINDL questionnaire that is semantic and culturally equivalent to the original version.

METHODS

For the adaptation, the methodology of direct and inverse translation was used. The questionnaire was applied to groups from three schools in Uberlândia, MG - Brazil, and comprised of 378 children and adolescents aged between 12 and 16. 16% of the students were randomly selected to repeat the test. In the statistical analysis, the following aspects were appraised and analyzed such as: lost data, floor and ceiling effect, internal consistence of the item and reliability of the internal consistence of the scales.

RESULTS

The percentage of lost data in the scales was low varying between 1.6% to 2.57%, which indicates good acceptability of the questionnaire. The rates of floor and ceiling effect were lower than 12% suggesting that the instrument is sensitive to detect differences in quality of life related to the health of the children and adolescents ranked within the extreme ends. The Kiddo-KINDL as a whole has shown high reliability (Alpha Cronbach = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

The Kiddo-KINDL is a reliable tool to be used with children and adolescents in Brazil, and has provided important data of multidimensional nature.

摘要

目的

获得《儿童生活质量问卷(Kiddo-KINDL)》的葡萄牙语版本,使其在语义和文化上与原始版本等效。

方法

采用直接翻译和反向翻译的方法进行改编。该问卷应用于巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州乌贝兰迪亚市三所学校的学生群体,包括378名年龄在12至16岁之间的儿童和青少年。随机抽取16%的学生重复测试。在统计分析中,评估并分析了以下方面:缺失数据、地板效应和天花板效应、项目的内部一致性以及量表内部一致性的可靠性。

结果

各量表中缺失数据的百分比很低,在1.6%至2.57%之间,这表明该问卷具有良好的可接受性。地板效应和天花板效应的发生率低于12%,这表明该工具能够灵敏地检测出处于极端水平的儿童和青少年与健康相关的生活质量差异。《儿童生活质量问卷(Kiddo-KINDL)》整体显示出较高的信度(克朗巴哈α系数=0.79)。

结论

《儿童生活质量问卷(Kiddo-KINDL)》是一种可靠的工具,可用于巴西的儿童和青少年,并提供了重要的多维度数据。

相似文献

1
Cultural adaptation and validation of the KINDL questionnaire in Brazil for adolescents between 12 and 16 years of age.KINDL问卷在巴西针对12至16岁青少年的文化适应性与效度验证。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;15(4):845-57. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2012000400015.
2
Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL children quality of life questionnaire.新加坡英语版儿童生活质量问卷(KINDL)的因子结构
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 19;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-4.
3
[Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: preliminary validation and reliability of the Spanish version of the KINDL questionnaire].[儿童和青少年健康相关生活质量的测量:KINDL问卷西班牙语版的初步验证与信度]
Aten Primaria. 2004 May 15;33(8):434-42. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)79429-9.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-kINDL generic children's health-related quality of life instrument.台湾版儿童生活质量通用量表Kiddo-kINDL的心理测量学评估
Qual Life Res. 2008 May;17(4):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9328-3.
5
Reliability and validity of a Nepalese version of the Kiddo-KINDL in adolescents.《尼泊尔版儿童生活质量量表在青少年中的信度和效度》
Biosci Trends. 2010 Aug;4(4):178-85.
6
[Portuguese-language cultural adaptation and translation of "The Bowel Disease Questionnaire" used to assess functional bowel disorders].
Arq Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr-Jun;43(2):138-53. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032006000200015.
7
Validation of the English version of the KINDL generic children's health-related quality of life instrument for an Asian population--results from a pilot test.适用于亚洲人群的KINDL通用儿童健康相关生活质量量表英文版的验证——一项预试验的结果
Qual Life Res. 2005 May;14(4):1193-200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2957-2.
8
[Cross-cultural adaptation and validation for Portuguese (Brazil) of health related quality of life instruments specific for gastroesophageal reflux disease].[针对巴西葡萄牙语的胃食管反流病特定健康相关生活质量量表的跨文化调适与验证]
Arq Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr-Jun;44(2):168-77. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032007000200016.
9
Health Related Quality of Life Assessment questionnaire for children aged 5 to 11 years with HIV/AIDS: cross-cultural adaptation for the Portuguese language.儿童艾滋病健康相关生活质量评估问卷:5 至 11 岁儿童艾滋病患者的跨文化适应(葡萄牙语版)。
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Jul;27(7):1445-9. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000700020.
10
Enhancing the cross-cultural adaptation and validation process: linguistic and psychometric testing of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of a self-report measure for dry eye.增强跨文化适应和验证过程:对一种自我报告干眼测量工具的巴西葡萄牙语版本进行语言和心理计量学测试。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):370-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term back pain recall in Generation XXI adolescents: the role of sensitivity and pain history.二十一世纪青少年的长期背痛回忆:敏感性和疼痛史的作用。
Pain Rep. 2025 May 20;10(3):e1272. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001272. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Reproducibility and Validity of a Self-Administered Food Safety Assessment Tool on Children and Adolescent's Risk Perception, Knowledge, and Practices.儿童和青少年食品安全评估工具的可重复性和有效性:风险感知、知识和实践。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 1;15(1):213. doi: 10.3390/nu15010213.
3
A Machine Learning Approach to Assess Differential Item Functioning of the KINDL Quality of Life Questionnaire Across Children with and Without ADHD.
一种机器学习方法评估 ADHD 儿童与非 ADHD 儿童的 KINDL 生活质量问卷的差异项目功能。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022 Oct;53(5):980-991. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01179-6. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
PEDIATRIC ASTHMA: IMPACT OF THE DISEASE IN CHILDREN RECEIVING OUTPATIENT TREATMENT IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL.小儿哮喘:巴西南部接受门诊治疗的儿童患者的疾病影响。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2020;38:e2018398. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018398. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Socioeconomic status, social support, oral health beliefs, psychosocial factors, health behaviours and health-related quality of life in adolescents.青少年的社会经济地位、社会支持、口腔健康信念、心理社会因素、健康行为和健康相关生活质量。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):141-151. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02279-6. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
6
Quality of life in patients with food allergy.食物过敏患者的生活质量
Clin Mol Allergy. 2016 Feb 17;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12948-016-0041-4. eCollection 2016.