• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diagnostic criteria for erosive lichen planus affecting the vulva: an international electronic-Delphi consensus exercise.外阴部糜烂性扁平苔藓的诊断标准:一项国际电子德尔菲共识研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;169(2):337-43. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12334.
2
Diagnostic criteria in 72 women with erosive vulvovaginal lichen planus.72例糜烂性外阴阴道扁平苔藓患者的诊断标准。
Australas J Dermatol. 2016 Nov;57(4):284-287. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12355. Epub 2015 May 26.
3
Forming diagnostic criteria for vulvar lichen planus.制定外阴硬化性苔藓的诊断标准。
Australas J Dermatol. 2020 Nov;61(4):324-329. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13350. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Expert opinion on characteristics of vulval lichen sclerosus: initial identification of important clinical features through an international electronic Delphi consensus study.外阴硬化性苔藓特征的专家意见:通过国际电子德尔菲共识研究初步确定重要临床特征
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025 Feb 24;50(3):590-596. doi: 10.1093/ced/llae393.
5
Real-life experience of managing vulval erosive lichen planus: a case-based review and U.K. multicentre case note audit.外阴侵蚀性扁平苔藓的真实管理经验:基于病例的回顾和英国多中心病例记录审核。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jul;167(1):85-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10919.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
6
Erosive Lichen Planus.糜烂性扁平苔藓。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Sep;44(3):407-420. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.04.004.
7
Erosive lichen planus of the vulva and vagina.外阴及阴道糜烂性扁平苔藓
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 2):1121-5. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02383-9.
8
A Delphi consensus on the nomenclature and diagnosis of lichen planus pigmentosus and related entities.关于色素性扁平苔藓及相关疾病的命名和诊断的德尔菲共识。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023 Jan-Frebuary;89(1):41-46. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_804_2021.
9
Erosive vulval lichen planus--a diagnosis not to be missed: a clinical review.侵蚀性外阴扁平苔藓——不容错过的诊断:临床综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Dec;171(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.038. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
10
Vulvo-vaginal lichen planus: A focussed review for the clinician.外阴阴道扁平苔藓:给临床医生的重点综述
Australas J Dermatol. 2019 Feb;60(1):7-11. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12875. Epub 2018 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Erosive Lichen Planus Treated With Tofacitinib: A Case Series of 23 Patients.托法替布治疗糜烂性扁平苔藓:23例病例系列
Australas J Dermatol. 2025 Jun;66(4):234-237. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14452. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
Labial adhesions due to vulvovaginal lichen planus suspected to be caused by angiotensin II receptor blocker.疑似由血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂引起的外阴阴道扁平苔藓导致的阴唇粘连。
IJU Case Rep. 2024 Dec 18;8(2):100-103. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12815. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Vulvo-Vaginal-Oral Lichen Planus: A Case Report and Literature Review.外阴-阴道-口腔扁平苔藓:一例病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Dec 6;16(12):e75204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75204. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with vulvar lichen planus who have failed topical therapy with potent corticosteroids: a study protocol for a single-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial.比较德瓦鲁单抗与甲氨蝶呤治疗强效皮质类固醇外用治疗失败的外阴扁平苔藓患者的疗效和安全性:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08022-y.
5
[Genital lichen sclerosus and lichen planus].[生殖器硬化性苔藓和扁平苔藓]
Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2024 Jan;75(1):22-29. doi: 10.1007/s00105-023-05267-7. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
6
Quality of life impact and treatment response in vulval disease: Comparison of 3 common conditions using the Vulval Quality of Life Index.外阴疾病的生活质量影响和治疗反应:使用外阴生活质量指数比较 3 种常见疾病。
Australas J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;63(4):e320-e328. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13898. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
7
On the definition of dermatological disease. Part 2: approaches for defining dermatological diseases.皮肤病定义。第 2 部分:皮肤病定义方法。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Oct;47(10):1812-1819. doi: 10.1111/ced.15278. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
Developing consensus in Histopathology: the role of the Delphi method.制定组织病理学共识:德尔菲法的作用。
Histopathology. 2022 Aug;81(2):159-167. doi: 10.1111/his.14650. Epub 2022 Apr 24.
9
Apremilast for genital erosive lichen planus in women (the AP-GELP Study): study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.阿普米司特治疗女性生殖器糜烂性扁平苔藓(AP-GELP 研究):一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 20;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05428-w.
10
Unwarranted hysterectomy in a case of oro-vaginal-vulvar lichen planus in a young woman: a case report.年轻女性口腔-阴道-外阴扁平苔藓行不必要子宫切除术 1 例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2021 Feb 26;15(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13256-021-02720-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Vulval erosive lichen planus: a qualitative investigation of U.K. clinician views and principles of management.外阴糜烂性扁平苔藓:对英国临床医生观点及管理原则的定性调查
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jul;169(1):226-7. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12373.
2
Doing the E-Delphi: using online survey tools.开展电子德尔菲法:使用在线调查工具。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Jul;30(7):347-50. doi: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e31825e8923.
3
Real-life experience of managing vulval erosive lichen planus: a case-based review and U.K. multicentre case note audit.外阴侵蚀性扁平苔藓的真实管理经验:基于病例的回顾和英国多中心病例记录审核。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jul;167(1):85-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10919.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
4
Core outcome domains for controlled trials and clinical recordkeeping in eczema: international multiperspective Delphi consensus process.用于湿疹临床试验和临床记录的核心结局领域:国际多视角德尔菲共识过程。
J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Mar;131(3):623-30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.303. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
5
Vulval lichen sclerosus and lichen planus.外阴硬化性苔藓和扁平苔藓。
Dermatol Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):523-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2010.01355.x.
6
Diagnosis of vulval inflammatory dermatoses: a pathological study with clinical correlation.外阴炎症性皮肤病的诊断:临床相关性的病理学研究。
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009 Nov;28(6):554-8. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181a9fb0d.
7
The role of vulvar skin biopsy in the evaluation of chronic vulvar pain.外阴皮肤活检在慢性外阴疼痛评估中的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):467.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 May 19.
8
Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria.德尔菲法作为一种确立诊断标准共识的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;56(12):1150-6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00211-7.
9
Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the clinical assessment of oral lichen planus.口腔扁平苔藓临床评估中的观察者间及观察者内变异
J Oral Pathol Med. 2002 Feb;31(2):95-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0904-2512.2001.00174.x.
10
The evaluation of cutaneous, genital, scalp, nail, esophageal, and ocular involvement in patients with oral lichen planus.口腔扁平苔藓患者皮肤、生殖器、头皮、指甲、食管及眼部受累情况的评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Oct;88(4):431-6. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70057-0.

外阴部糜烂性扁平苔藓的诊断标准:一项国际电子德尔菲共识研究。

Diagnostic criteria for erosive lichen planus affecting the vulva: an international electronic-Delphi consensus exercise.

机构信息

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, UK.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;169(2):337-43. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12334.

DOI:10.1111/bjd.12334
PMID:23521206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3838629/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no defined set of criteria for diagnosing erosive lichen planus affecting the vulva (ELPV) and there is geographical variation in management.

OBJECTIVES

To reach consensus on clinicopathological diagnostic criteria for ELPV.

METHODS

This was a three-stage international electronic-Delphi exercise with a subsequent formal feedback process. In the first two rounds participants were asked to rate the importance of a list of clinicopathological criteria. Responses from round 1 were summarized and presented in round 2, along with additional criteria suggested by participants. In round 3, participants were asked to rate the items that had reached consensus as 'essential' or 'supportive' features in diagnosing ELPV. Consensus was defined as being reached if 75% of participants agreed on the importance of an item.

RESULTS

A total of 73 experts representing dermatology, gynaecology, histopathology and genitourinary medicine participated; 69 (95%) completed all three rounds. Consensus was achieved for the following 'supportive' diagnostic criteria: (i) well-demarcated erosions/erythematous areas at the vaginal introitus; (ii) presence of a hyperkeratotic border to lesions and/or Wickham striae in surrounding skin; (iii) symptoms of pain/burning; (iv) scarring/loss of normal architecture; (v) presence of vaginal inflammation; (vi) involvement of other mucosal surfaces; (vii) presence of a well-defined inflammatory band involving the dermoepidermo junction; (viii) presence of an inflammatory band consisting predominantly of lymphocytes; and (ix) signs of basal layer degeneration. It was suggested that at least three supportive features should be present to make a diagnosis of ELPV, although this number is subject to further discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified a diagnostic dataset for ELPV that can be adopted into clinical practice and clinical trials.

摘要

背景

目前尚无明确的诊断外阴糜烂性扁平苔藓(ELPV)的标准,且管理方法存在地域差异。

目的

就 ELPV 的临床病理诊断标准达成共识。

方法

这是一项分三个阶段进行的国际电子德尔菲研究,随后进行了正式的反馈过程。在前两轮中,参与者被要求对一系列临床病理标准的重要性进行评分。第一轮的回复在第二轮中进行了总结和展示,同时还增加了参与者提出的其他标准。在第三轮中,参与者被要求对已达成共识的项目进行评分,将其评为诊断 ELPV 的“必备”或“支持性”特征。如果 75%的参与者同意某一项目的重要性,则达成共识。

结果

共有 73 名代表皮肤科、妇科、组织病理学和泌尿学的专家参与了研究;其中 69 名(95%)完成了所有三轮。以下“支持性”诊断标准达成共识:(i)阴道入口处有界限清楚的糜烂/红斑区;(ii)病变处有过度角化边界和/或威克姆纹,周围皮肤有威克姆纹;(iii)疼痛/烧灼感症状;(iv)瘢痕/正常结构缺失;(v)存在阴道炎症;(vi)累及其他黏膜表面;(vii)存在累及真皮表皮交界处的明确炎症带;(viii)存在主要由淋巴细胞组成的炎症带;和(ix)基底细胞层变性的迹象。建议至少有三个支持性特征存在才能诊断 ELPV,但具体数量还有待进一步讨论。

结论

本研究确定了 ELPV 的诊断数据集,可用于临床实践和临床试验。