Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059214. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
To evaluate the long term neurodevelopmental outcome of premature infants exposed to either gram- negative sepsis (GNS) or neonatal Candida sepsis (NCS), and to compare their outcome with premature infants without sepsis.
Historical cohort study in a population of infants born at <30 weeks gestation and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam during the period 1997-2007. Outcome of infants exposed to GNS or NCS and 120 randomly chosen uncomplicated controls (UC) from the same NICU were compared. Clinical data during hospitalization and neurodevelopmental outcome data (clinical neurological status; Bayley-test results and vision/hearing test results) at the corrected age of 24 months were collected. An association model with sepsis as the central determinant of either good or adverse outcome (death or severe developmental delay) was made, corrected for confounders using multiple logistic regression analysis.
Of 1362 patients, 55 suffered from GNS and 29 suffered from NCS; cumulative incidence 4.2% and 2.2%, respectively. During the follow-up period the mortality rate was 34% for both GNS and NCS and 5% for UC. The adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) [95% CI] for adverse outcome in the GNS group compared to the NCS group was 1.4 [0.4-4.9]. The adjusted ORs [95% CI] for adverse outcome in the GNS and NCS groups compared to the UC group were 4.8 [1.5-15.9] and 3.2 [0.7-14.7], respectively.
We found no statistically significant difference in outcome at the corrected age of 24 months between neonatal GNS and NCS cases. Suffering from either gram-negative or Candida sepsis increased the odds for adverse outcome compared with an uncomplicated neonatal period.
评估患有革兰氏阴性菌败血症(GNS)或新生儿念珠菌败血症(NCS)的早产儿的长期神经发育结局,并将其与无败血症的早产儿进行比较。
这是一项在阿姆斯特丹学术医学中心新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)于 1997 年至 2007 年期间出生的<30 周早产儿中进行的历史队列研究。比较了患有 GNS 或 NCS 的婴儿与同一 NICU 中 120 名随机选择的无并发症对照者(UC)的结局。收集了住院期间的临床数据和 24 个月时的神经发育结局数据(临床神经状态;贝利测试结果和视力/听力测试结果)。采用以败血症为良好或不良结局(死亡或严重发育迟缓)的中心决定因素的关联模型,使用多变量逻辑回归分析校正混杂因素。
在 1362 名患者中,55 名患有 GNS,29 名患有 NCS;累积发病率分别为 4.2%和 2.2%。在随访期间,GNS 和 NCS 组的死亡率均为 34%,UC 组为 5%。与 NCS 组相比,GNS 组不良结局的调整后优势比(OR)[95%可信区间]为 1.4[0.4-4.9]。与 UC 组相比,GNS 和 NCS 组不良结局的调整后 OR[95%可信区间]分别为 4.8[1.5-15.9]和 3.2[0.7-14.7]。
我们发现新生儿 GNS 和 NCS 病例在 24 个月时的校正年龄的结局没有统计学上的显著差异。与无并发症的新生儿期相比,患有革兰氏阴性菌或念珠菌败血症会增加不良结局的几率。