Mycobacteria/Nocardia Research Laboratory, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1747-52. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00186-13. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
Recent studies have shown that respiratory isolates from pulmonary disease patients and household water/biofilm isolates of Mycobacterium avium could be matched by DNA fingerprinting. To determine if this is true for Mycobacterium intracellulare, household water sources for 36 patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease were evaluated. MAC household water isolates from three published studies that included 37 additional MAC respiratory disease patients were also evaluated. Species identification was done initially using nonsequencing methods with confirmation by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and/or partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. M. intracellulare was identified by nonsequencing methods in 54 respiratory cultures and 41 household water/biofilm samples. By ITS sequencing, 49 (90.7%) respiratory isolates were M. intracellulare and 4 (7.4%) were Mycobacterium chimaera. In contrast, 30 (73%) household water samples were M. chimaera, 8 (20%) were other MAC X species (i.e., isolates positive with a MAC probe but negative with species-specific M. avium and M. intracellulare probes), and 3 (7%) were M. avium; none were M. intracellulare. In comparison, M. avium was recovered from 141 water/biofilm samples. These results indicate that M. intracellulare lung disease in the United States is acquired from environmental sources other than household water. Nonsequencing methods for identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria (including those of the MAC) might fail to distinguish closely related species (such as M. intracellulare and M. chimaera). This is the first report of M. chimaera recovery from household water. The study underscores the importance of taxonomy and distinguishing the many species and subspecies of the MAC.
最近的研究表明,通过 DNA 指纹图谱分析,可以将来自肺部疾病患者的呼吸道分离株和家庭用水/生物膜中的鸟分枝杆菌分离株相匹配。为了确定分枝杆菌是否也适用于胞内分枝杆菌,对 36 名患有鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)肺部疾病的患者的家庭用水源进行了评估。还评估了来自三个已发表研究的 MAC 家庭用水分离株,这些研究包括另外 37 名 MAC 呼吸道疾病患者。最初使用非测序方法进行种属鉴定,并用内部转录间隔区(ITS)和/或部分 16S rRNA 基因测序进行确认。通过非测序方法在 54 个呼吸道培养物和 41 个家庭用水/生物膜样本中鉴定出胞内分枝杆菌。通过 ITS 测序,49 个(90.7%)呼吸道分离株为胞内分枝杆菌,4 个(7.4%)为奇美拉分枝杆菌。相比之下,30 个(73%)家庭用水样本为奇美拉分枝杆菌,8 个(20%)为其他 MAC X 种(即与 MAC 探针阳性但与种特异性鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌探针阴性的分离株),3 个(7%)为鸟分枝杆菌;均未发现胞内分枝杆菌。相比之下,从 141 个水/生物膜样本中回收了鸟分枝杆菌。这些结果表明,美国的胞内分枝杆菌肺病是从家庭用水以外的环境来源获得的。非测序方法用于鉴定非结核分枝杆菌(包括 MAC)可能无法区分密切相关的物种(如胞内分枝杆菌和奇美拉分枝杆菌)。这是首次从家庭用水中回收奇美拉分枝杆菌的报告。该研究强调了分类学的重要性以及区分 MAC 的许多种和亚种的重要性。