Department of Infection Control Science, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1762-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00234-13. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are transmissible carbapenemases of increasing prevalence in Gram-negative bacteria among health care facilities worldwide. Control of the further spread of these carbapenem-resistant bacteria relies on clinical microbiological laboratories correctly identifying and classifying the MBLs. In this study, we evaluated a simple and rapid method for detecting IMP, the most prevalent MBL in Japan. We used an immunochromatography (IC) assay for 181 carbapenem-nonsusceptible (CNS) (nonsusceptible to imipenem or meropenem) strains comprising 74 IMP-producing and 33 non-IMP-producing strains of non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFGNR), as well as 64 IMP-producing and 10 non-IMP-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains. The IC assay results were compared to those from the double-disk synergy test (DDST), the MBL Etest, and the modified Hodge test (MHT) (only for Enterobacteriaceae). The IMP type was confirmed by specific PCR and direct sequencing. The IC assay detected all of the IMP-type MBLs, including IMP-1, -2, -6, -7, -10, -11, -19, -20, and -22 and IMP-40, -41, and -42 (new types), with 100% specificity and sensitivity against all strains tested. Although the sensitivity and specificity values for the DDST and MHT were equivalent to those for the IC assay, the MBL Etest was positive for only 87% of NFGNR and 31% of Enterobacteriaceae due to the low MIC of imipenem, causing an indeterminate evaluation. These results indicated that the IC assay might be a useful alternative to PCR for IMP MBL detection screening.
金属β-内酰胺酶(MBLs)是全球医疗机构中革兰氏阴性菌中传播日益普遍的碳青霉烯酶。控制这些耐碳青霉烯类抗生素细菌的进一步传播依赖于临床微生物学实验室正确识别和分类 MBLs。在这项研究中,我们评估了一种简单快速的方法来检测日本最常见的 MBL——IMP。我们使用免疫层析(IC)法检测了 181 株耐碳青霉烯(对亚胺培南或美罗培南不敏感)非葡萄糖发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌(NFGNR)菌株,其中 74 株产 IMP,33 株非产 IMP,以及 64 株产 IMP 和 10 株非产 IMP 的肠杆菌科菌株。将 IC 检测结果与双碟协同试验(DDST)、MBL E 试验和改良 Hodge 试验(仅用于肠杆菌科)进行比较。IMP 型通过特异性 PCR 和直接测序确认。IC 检测法可检测到所有 IMP 型 MBL,包括 IMP-1、-2、-6、-7、-10、-11、-19、-20 和 -22 以及 IMP-40、-41 和 -42(新型),对所有测试菌株的特异性和敏感性均为 100%。虽然 DDST 和 MHT 的灵敏度和特异性值与 IC 检测法相当,但 MBL E 试验对 NFGNR 的阳性率仅为 87%,对肠杆菌科的阳性率仅为 31%,这是由于亚胺培南的 MIC 较低,导致结果不确定。这些结果表明,IC 检测法可能是 IMP MBL 检测筛选的一种有用的替代 PCR 方法。