Suppr超能文献

2012 年加利福尼亚州医院试产机会的调查。

A survey of access to trial of labor in California hospitals in 2012.

机构信息

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Apr 3;13:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-83.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2010, the NIH and ACOG recommended increasing women's access to trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). This study explored access to TOLAC in California, change in access since 2007 and 2010, and characteristics of TOLAC and non-TOLAC hospitals.

METHODS

Between November 2011 and June 2012, charge nurses at all civilian California birth hospitals were surveyed about hospitals' TOLAC availability and requirements for providers. VBAC rates were obtained from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). Distance between hospitals was calculated using OSHPD geocoding.

RESULTS

All 243 birth hospitals that were contacted participated. In 2010, among the 56% TOLAC hospitals, the median VBAC rate among TOLAC hospitals was 10.8% (range 0-37.3%). The most cited reason for low VBAC rates was physician unwillingness to perform them, especially due to the requirement to be continually present during labor. TOLAC hospitals were more likely to be larger hospitals in urban communities with obstetrical residency training. However, there were six (11.3%) residency programs in non-TOLAC hospitals and 5 (13.5%) rural hospitals offering TOLAC. The majority of TOLAC hospitals had 24/7 anesthesia coverage and required the obstetrician to be continually present if a TOLAC patient was admitted; 17 (12.2%) allowed personnel to be 15-30 minutes away. TOLAC eligibility criteria included one prior cesarean (32.4%), spontaneous labor (52.5%), continuous fetal monitoring and intravenous access (99.3%), and epidural analgesia (19.4%). The mean distance from a non-TOLAC to a TOLAC hospital was 37 mi. with 25% of non-TOLAC hospitals more than 51 mi. from the closest TOLAC hospital. In 2012, 139 hospitals (57.2%) offered TOLAC, 16.6% fewer than in 2007. Since 2010, five hospitals started and four stopped offering TOLAC, a net gain of one hospital offering TOLAC with three more considering it. Only two hospitals cited change in ACOG guidelines as a reason for the change.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the 2010 NIH and ACOG recommendations encouraging greater access to TOLAC, 44% of California hospitals do not allow TOLAC. Of the 56% allowing TOLAC, 10.8% report fewer than 3% VBAC births. Thus, national recommendations encouraging greater access to TOLAC had a minor effect in California.

摘要

背景

2010 年,NIH 和 ACOG 建议增加妇女剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)的机会。本研究探讨了加利福尼亚州 TOLAC 的可及性、2007 年至 2010 年期间 TOLAC 可及性的变化,以及 TOLAC 和非 TOLAC 医院的特征。

方法

在 2011 年 11 月至 2012 年 6 月期间,对所有加利福尼亚州的民用分娩医院的护士长进行了调查,调查了医院 TOLAC 的可及性和提供者的要求。VBAC 率来自加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划和发展办公室(OSHPD)。使用 OSHPD 地理编码计算医院之间的距离。

结果

所有 243 家联系过的分娩医院均参与了研究。在 2010 年,在 56%的 TOLAC 医院中,TOLAC 医院的中位 VBAC 率为 10.8%(范围 0-37.3%)。引用的 VBAC 率低的最常见原因是医生不愿意进行 VBAC,特别是因为需要在分娩期间持续在场。TOLAC 医院更有可能是在有产科住院医师培训的城市社区中的大型医院。然而,有 6 个(11.3%)住院医师培训项目在非 TOLAC 医院,有 5 个(13.5%)农村医院提供 TOLAC。大多数 TOLAC 医院都有 24/7 的麻醉覆盖,如果 TOLAC 患者入院,需要产科医生持续在场;17 家(12.2%)允许人员在 15-30 分钟内到达。TOLAC 的资格标准包括一次剖宫产(32.4%)、自然分娩(52.5%)、连续胎儿监测和静脉通路(99.3%)和硬膜外镇痛(19.4%)。非 TOLAC 医院与 TOLAC 医院的平均距离为 37 英里,其中 25%的非 TOLAC 医院距离最近的 TOLAC 医院超过 51 英里。2012 年,有 139 家医院(57.2%)提供 TOLAC,比 2007 年减少了 16.6%。自 2010 年以来,有 5 家医院开始提供 TOLAC,有 4 家医院停止提供 TOLAC,增加了 1 家提供 TOLAC 的医院,还有 3 家医院正在考虑提供 TOLAC。只有两家医院将 ACOG 指南的变化作为改变的原因之一。

结论

尽管 2010 年 NIH 和 ACOG 的建议鼓励更多地接受 TOLAC,但加利福尼亚州仍有 44%的医院不允许 TOLAC。在允许 TOLAC 的 56%的医院中,报告的 VBAC 分娩率不到 3%。因此,鼓励更多地接受 TOLAC 的国家建议在加利福尼亚州的影响较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e36d/3636061/3d70a96a1115/1471-2393-13-83-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验