Université de Bourgogne/INRA, UMR 1347 Agroécologie, 17 rue Sully, BP 86510, 21000, Dijon, France,
Mycorrhiza. 2013 Oct;23(7):515-31. doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0486-y. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
The publication of a large number of taxon names at all levels within the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) has resulted in conflicting systematic schemes and generated considerable confusion among biologists working with these important plant symbionts. A group of biologists with more than a century of collective experience in the systematics of Glomeromycota examined all available molecular-phylogenetic evidence within the framework of phylogenetic hypotheses, incorporating morphological characters when they were congruent. This study is the outcome, wherein the classification of Glomeromycota is revised by rejecting some new names on the grounds that they are founded in error and by synonymizing others that, while validly published, are not evidence-based. The proposed "consensus" will provide a framework for additional original research aimed at clarifying the evolutionary history of this important group of symbiotic fungi.
大量的丛枝菌根真菌(Glomeromycota)各级分类群名称的发表导致了系统方案的冲突,并在研究这些重要植物共生体的生物学家中引起了相当大的混乱。一组具有一个多世纪 Glomeromycota 系统学经验的生物学家,在系统发育假说的框架内检查了所有可用的分子系统发育证据,当形态特征一致时,将其纳入其中。这项研究是对 Glomeromycota 分类的修订,其理由是一些新名称是错误的,而另一些名称虽然有效发表,但缺乏基于证据的支持,因此被同义化。所提出的“共识”将为进一步的原始研究提供一个框架,旨在澄清这一重要共生真菌群的进化历史。