INRIA, 2004, Route des Lucioles, F-06902 Sophia Antipolis, France.
J Neural Eng. 2013 Jun;10(3):031001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/031001. Epub 2013 May 3.
In recent years, numerous brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on motor-imagery have been proposed which incorporate features such as adaptive classification, error detection and correction, fusion with auxiliary signals and shared control capabilities. Due to the added complexity of such algorithms, the evaluation strategy and metrics used for analysis must be carefully chosen to accurately represent the performance of the BCI. In this article, metrics are reviewed and contrasted using both simulated examples and experimental data. Furthermore, a review of the recent literature is presented to determine how BCIs are evaluated, in particular, focusing on the relationship between how the data are used relative to the BCI subcomponent under investigation. From the analysis performed in this study, valuable guidelines are presented regarding the choice of metrics and evaluation strategy dependent upon any chosen BCI paradigm.
近年来,已经提出了许多基于运动想象的脑机接口 (BCI),它们结合了自适应分类、错误检测和纠正、与辅助信号融合以及共享控制能力等功能。由于这些算法的复杂性增加,因此必须仔细选择用于分析的评估策略和指标,以准确表示 BCI 的性能。在本文中,使用模拟示例和实验数据对指标进行了回顾和对比。此外,还对最近的文献进行了回顾,以确定如何评估 BCI,特别是重点关注相对于正在研究的 BCI 子组件,数据的使用方式与 BCI 之间的关系。通过本研究中的分析,提出了有关依赖于所选 BCI 范例的指标和评估策略选择的有价值的准则。