• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search.什么时候该转移到下一片覆盆子丛?人类视觉搜索中的觅食规则。
J Vis. 2013 Jan 1;13(3):10. doi: 10.1167/13.3.10.
2
Using the past to anticipate the future in human foraging behavior.
Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt A):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
3
No matter what you do, travel is travel in visual foraging.无论你做什么,旅行都是在进行视觉觅食。
Vision Res. 2024 Nov;224:108491. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108491. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
4
Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.混合价值觅食:目标价值如何塑造人类觅食行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.
5
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.混合觅食搜索:搜索多种类型目标的多个实例。
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.老年和年轻个体中的混合觅食搜索。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):805-820. doi: 10.1037/pag0000387. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
7
Winter is coming: How humans forage in a temporally structured environment.冬天即将来临:人类如何在时间结构化的环境中觅食。
J Vis. 2015 Aug 1;15(11):1. doi: 10.1167/15.11.1.
8
Research on re-searching: interrupted foraging is not disrupted foraging.再研究之研究:中断觅食并未扰乱觅食。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 15;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00556-8.
9
Foraging with Anne Treisman: Features versus conjunctions, patch leaving and memory for foraged locations.与安妮·特雷斯曼一起觅食:特征与组合、离开觅食区域以及对觅食地点的记忆
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):818-831. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01941-y.
10
Uncertainty drives deviations in normative foraging decision strategies.不确定性导致规范性觅食决策策略出现偏差。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Jul;18(180):20210337. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0337. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding target discriminability and time pressure using eye and head movement features in a foraging search task.在觅食搜索任务中利用眼睛和头部运动特征解码目标可辨别性和时间压力。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 22;10(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00657-y.
2
Picking the right piece: Action intentions shape visual search and action planning in human multi-target-foraging.挑选合适的目标:行动意图塑造人类多目标觅食中的视觉搜索和行动规划。
iScience. 2025 May 13;28(6):112656. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112656. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
3
Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.探索情绪:情绪刺激与参与者的特质焦虑塑造视觉探索行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):242175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242175. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Easy does it: Selection during interactive search tasks is biased towards objects that can be examined easily.慢慢来:交互式搜索任务中的选择偏向于易于检查的对象。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03083-w.
5
One factor to bind them all: visual foraging organization to predict patch leaving behavior with ROC curves.一个因素统揽全局:用视觉觅食组织和ROC曲线预测离开斑块行为
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Apr 5;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00624-7.
6
Foraging with your eyes: a novel task to study cognitive strategies involved in (visual) foraging behaviour.用眼觅食:一项用于研究(视觉)觅食行为中所涉及认知策略的新任务。
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01261-0.
7
Grocery Shopping Under Simplified Marginal Value Theorem Predictions.简化边际价值定理预测下的食品杂货购物
Hum Nat. 2024 Dec;35(4):451-476. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09485-3. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
8
Target selection during "snapshot" foraging.“快速”觅食过程中的目标选择。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Nov;86(8):2778-2793. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02988-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
9
Risky hybrid foraging: The impact of risk, reward value, and prevalence on foraging behavior in hybrid visual search.有风险的混合觅食:风险、奖励价值和发生率对混合视觉搜索中觅食行为的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1037/xge0001652.
10
Testing the convergent validity, domain generality, and temporal stability of selected measures of people's tendency to explore.检验探索倾向的特定测量指标的聚合效度、领域普遍性和时间稳定性。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 4;15(1):7721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51685-z.

本文引用的文献

1
A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.人类视觉搜索的贝叶斯最优觅食模型。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):1047-54. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440460. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
2
Simultaneous control of attention by multiple working memory representations.多个工作记忆表示对注意力的同时控制。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):887-98. doi: 10.1177/0956797612439068. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
3
Saved by a log: how do humans perform hybrid visual and memory search?被原木拯救:人类如何进行混合视觉和记忆搜索?
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):698-703. doi: 10.1177/0956797612443968. Epub 2012 May 22.
4
Optimal foraging in semantic memory.语义记忆中的最佳觅食。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):431-40. doi: 10.1037/a0027373. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
5
Visual search: a retrospective.视觉搜索:一项回顾性研究。
J Vis. 2011 Dec 30;11(5):14. doi: 10.1167/11.5.14.
6
Visual search.视觉搜索
Curr Biol. 2010 Apr 27;20(8):R346-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.016.
7
Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition.动物觅食与目标导向认知的进化。
Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan 2;30(1):3-41. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_50.
8
Fishing for the right words: decision rules for human foraging behavior in internal search tasks.寻找合适的词语:内部搜索任务中人类觅食行为的决策规则。
Cogn Sci. 2009 May;33(3):497-529. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01020.x.
9
Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.回顾沃尔多效应:动眼抑制返回并不妨碍返回注视。
J Vis. 2011 Jan 4;11(1):3. doi: 10.1167/11.1.3.
10
Situating visual search.定位视觉搜索。
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1526-37. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

什么时候该转移到下一片覆盆子丛?人类视觉搜索中的觅食规则。

When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search.

作者信息

Wolfe Jeremy M

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2013 Jan 1;13(3):10. doi: 10.1167/13.3.10.

DOI:10.1167/13.3.10
PMID:23641077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4521330/
Abstract

Animals, including humans, engage in many forms of foraging behavior in which resources are collected from the world. This paper examines human foraging in a visual search context. A real-world analog would be berry picking. The selection of individual berries is not the most interesting problem in such a task. Of more interest is when does a forager leave one patch or berry bush for the next one? Marginal Value Theorem (MVT; Charnov, 1976) predicts that observers will leave a patch when the instantaneous yield from that patch drops below the average yield from the entire "field." Experiments 1, 2, 3, and 4 show that MVT gives a good description of human behavior for roughly uniform collections of patches. Experiments 5 and 6 show strong departures from MVT when patch quality varies and when visual information is degraded.

摘要

包括人类在内的动物会进行多种形式的觅食行为,即从外界获取资源。本文研究视觉搜索情境下的人类觅食行为。现实世界中的类似行为是采摘浆果。在这样的任务中,挑选单个浆果并非最有趣的问题。更有趣的是,觅食者何时会离开一片区域或一丛浆果去寻找下一片?边际价值定理(MVT;查诺夫,1976)预测,当某片区域的即时产量降至整个“区域”的平均产量以下时,观察者就会离开这片区域。实验1、2、3和4表明,对于大致均匀的区域集合,MVT能很好地描述人类行为。实验5和6表明,当区域质量不同以及视觉信息退化时,人类行为会与MVT有很大偏差。