Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, China ; Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University Chengdu, China ; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 10;7:187. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187. eCollection 2013.
A systematic review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with unilateral neglect (UN) after stroke was conducted by searching the computerized databases from 1997 through 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neglect treatment strategies for stroke patients which used the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) as the primary outcome measure were eligible for inclusion. Out of 201 studies initially identified, 12 RCTs covering 277 participants were selected for analysis. All had the same weakness of low power with smaller samples and limitation in the blinding of the design. Prism Adaptation (PA) was the most commonly used intervention while continuous Theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) appeared to be a new approach. Meta-analysis showed that for immediate effects, the BIT conventional subscore had a significant and large mean effect size (ES = 0.76; 95% CI 0.28-1.23; p = 0.002) whereas the BIT total score showed a modestly significant mean ES (ES = 0.55; 95% CI 0.16-0.94; p = 0.006). No significant mean ES in sensitivity analysis was found for long-lasting effects across all BIT outcomes. PA appeared to be the most effective intervention based on the results of pooled analysis. More rigorous studies should be done on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) before it can be concluded that it is a promising treatment for UN.
对从 1997 年到 2012 年计算机化数据库中搜索到的单侧忽略(UN)脑卒中后康复效果的系统评价显示,对脑卒中患者忽视治疗策略的随机对照试验(RCT),若将行为忽视测验(BIT)作为主要结局指标,则符合纳入标准。在最初确定的 201 项研究中,有 12 项 RCT 共 277 名参与者被纳入分析。所有研究都存在相同的弱点,即样本量较小且设计的盲法受限,效能较低。棱镜适应(PA)是最常用的干预措施,而连续 theta 爆发刺激(cTBS)似乎是一种新方法。荟萃分析显示,就即刻效果而言,BIT 常规子量表的效应量具有显著的大均值(ES=0.76;95%CI 0.28-1.23;p=0.002),而 BIT 总分显示出适度显著的平均效应量(ES=0.55;95%CI 0.16-0.94;p=0.006)。在所有 BIT 结果的长期效果的敏感性分析中,未发现有意义的平均效应量。基于汇总分析的结果,PA 似乎是最有效的干预措施。在得出 rTMS 是 UN 一种有前途的治疗方法之前,应该进行更多关于重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的严格研究。