Center for Health Services and Society, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):1172-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301407. Epub 2013 May 16.
Community resilience (CR) is a priority for preparedness, but few models exist. A steering council used community-partnered participatory research to support workgroups in developing CR action plans and hosted forums for input to design a pilot demonstration of implementing CR versus enhanced individual preparedness toolkits. Qualitative data describe how stakeholders viewed CR, how toolkits were developed, and demonstration design evolution. Stakeholders viewed community engagement as facilitating partnerships to implement CR programs when appropriately supported by policy and CR resources. Community engagement exercises clarified motivations and informed action plans (e.g., including vulnerable populations). Community input identified barriers (e.g., trust in government) and CR-building strategies. A CR toolkit and demonstration comparing its implementation with individual preparedness were codeveloped. Community-partnered participatory research was a useful framework to plan a CR initiative through knowledge exchange.
社区韧性（CR）是备灾工作的重点，但目前相关模型较少。一个指导委员会使用社区伙伴参与式研究来支持工作组制定 CR 行动计划，并举办论坛征求意见，以设计一个实施 CR 与增强个体备灾工具包的试点示范。定性数据描述了利益相关者如何看待 CR、工具包的开发以及演示设计的演变。利益相关者认为，社区参与有助于在政策和 CR 资源的适当支持下建立合作伙伴关系，以实施 CR 项目。社区参与活动明确了动机，并为行动计划提供了信息（例如，包括弱势群体）。社区的投入确定了障碍（例如，对政府的信任）和建立 CR 的策略。一个 CR 工具包和一个比较其实施情况与个体备灾情况的示范项目被共同开发。社区伙伴参与式研究是通过知识交流来规划 CR 计划的有用框架。
