University of Tasmania, Faculty of Education, Launceston, TAS 7248, Australia.
J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:128376. doi: 10.1155/2013/128376. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
There is a plethora of workplace physical activity interventions designed to increase purposeful movement, yet few are designed to alleviate prolonged occupational sitting time. A pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility of a workplace e-health intervention based on a passive approach to increase nonpurposeful movement as a means of reducing sitting time. The study was trialled in a professional workplace with forty-six participants (33 females and 13 males) for a period of twenty-six weeks. Participants in the first thirteen weeks received a passive prompt every 45 minutes on their computer screen reminding them to stand and engage in nonpurposeful activity throughout their workday. After thirteen weeks, the prompt was disabled, and participants were then free to voluntary engage the software. Results demonstrated that when employees were exposed to a passive prompt, as opposed to an active prompt, they were five times more likely to fully adhere to completing a movement break every hour of the workday. Based on this pilot study, we suggest that the notion that people are willing to participate in a coercive workplace e-health intervention is promising, and there is a need for further investigation.
有大量旨在增加有目的运动的工作场所身体活动干预措施,但很少有措施旨在减轻长时间的职业坐姿时间。进行了一项试点研究,以测试基于被动方法的工作场所电子健康干预措施的可行性,该方法旨在增加无目的运动,以此作为减少坐姿时间的一种手段。该研究在一个专业工作场所进行,共有 46 名参与者(33 名女性和 13 名男性)参与,为期 26 周。在前 13 周,参与者每 45 分钟在计算机屏幕上收到一个被动提示,提醒他们在工作日期间站起来并进行无目的活动。13 周后,提示被禁用,参与者可以自由自愿使用该软件。结果表明,当员工受到被动提示,而不是主动提示时,他们更有可能每小时完成一次运动休息,完全遵守这一规定的可能性是前者的五倍。基于这项试点研究,我们认为人们愿意参与强制性的工作场所电子健康干预措施的观点是有前途的,需要进一步调查。