Hovanloo Fariborz, Arefirad Tahereh, Ahmadizad Sajad
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, 1983963113, Iran.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013 May 31;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/2251-6581-12-22.
Chronic and inflammatory diseases are major causes of mortality. Although the anti-inflammatory effects of exercise have been confirmed, but the effect of different types of exercise on inflammatory markers is different. The aim of this study is comparing the effects of two types of sprint interval (SIT) and continuous endurance (CET) training on inflammatory markers. Sixteen students who had recreational activities participated in this study and were randomly assigned to one of the two protocols. The SIT protocol consisted of four to six 30-s "all-out" Wingate tests separated by 4 minutes of recovery and The CET protocol included 90-120 minutes of cycling at 65% Vo2max. The two protocols were performed 3 days per week and for two weeks. In each group, two blood samples were collected before and 2 days (24 and 48 hrs) after the training. Results showed that there was no significant difference between the two training protocols on all measured parameters (p>0.05). The results of present study showed that the SIT and CET have identical effects on inflammatory markers.
慢性疾病和炎症性疾病是主要的死亡原因。尽管运动的抗炎作用已得到证实,但不同类型的运动对炎症标志物的影响有所不同。本研究的目的是比较两种短跑间歇训练(SIT)和持续耐力训练(CET)对炎症标志物的影响。16名有休闲活动的学生参与了本研究,并被随机分配到两种训练方案中的一种。SIT方案包括四到六次30秒的“全力”温盖特测试,每次测试间隔4分钟恢复时间,CET方案包括在65%最大摄氧量下进行90 - 120分钟的骑行。两种训练方案每周进行3天,持续两周。每组在训练前和训练后2天(24小时和48小时)采集两份血样。结果显示,两种训练方案在所有测量参数上均无显著差异(p>0.05)。本研究结果表明,SIT和CET对炎症标志物具有相同的影响。