• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一份用于测量学龄前儿童在重复测量设计中对噪声的反应和应对的问卷。

Validation of a questionnaire measuring preschool children's reactions to and coping with noise in a repeated measurement design.

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002408.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002408
PMID:23793676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3657644/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to explore and describe the reliability and validity of an instrument to measure preschool children's reactions to and coping with indoor noise at preschools or day care centres.

DESIGN

Data were derived from an acoustical before and after intervention study providing repeated measurements.

SETTING

The study was performed at seven preschools in Mölndal, Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

Children were recruited from these preschools and the final sample comprised 61 and 59 preschool children aged 4-5 years, with a response rate of 98% and 48% girls and 52% boys. Two children were excluded from analysis because they fell outside the age range.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The instrument was developed based on a qualitative study performed in Swedish preschools. Questions pertained to preschool children's perception of noise when at school, their bodily and emotional reactions to it, non-specific symptoms and the coping strategies used by them to diminish the detrimental effects of the noise.

RESULTS

Confirmative factor analysis yielded a three-factor model fitted to 10 items pertaining to angry reactions, symptoms and coping. The model fit was moderate to good (standardised root mean square residual=0.08, 0.12; adjusted goodness of fit=0.97/0.91) in the before and after conditions, respectively. The  scales showed moderate to good reliability in terms of internal consistency, with an α ranging between 0.52 and 0.67, and was stronger in the before condition. Concurrent validity was strongest for symptoms by comparing groups based on bodily reaction (general and sound specific).

CONCLUSIONS

Young children's emotional and bodily reactions to coping with noise can be reliably measured with this instrument. Like adults and older children, young children are able to distinguish between emotional reactions, bodily reactions, coping and unwell-being. Future research on larger groups of preschool children is needed to further refine the questions, in particular the questions pertaining to well-being.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探索和描述一种测量学龄前儿童在幼儿园或日托中心对室内噪声的反应和应对能力的工具的信度和效度。

设计

数据来自于一项声学干预前后研究,提供了重复测量。

设置

该研究在瑞典莫尔恩达尔的七所幼儿园进行。

参与者

从这些幼儿园招募儿童,最终样本包括 61 名和 59 名 4-5 岁的学龄前儿童,女孩的应答率为 98%,男孩为 48%,女孩为 52%。有 2 名儿童因年龄不在范围内而被排除在分析之外。

主要和次要结果测量

该工具是基于在瑞典幼儿园进行的定性研究开发的。问题涉及学龄前儿童在学校时对噪声的感知、他们对噪声的身体和情绪反应、非特异性症状以及他们用来减轻噪声不利影响的应对策略。

结果

验证性因子分析得出了一个适合 10 个项目的三因素模型,这些项目涉及愤怒反应、症状和应对策略。该模型在干预前后的拟合度分别为中等至良好(标准化均方根残差分别为 0.08 和 0.12;调整后的拟合优度分别为 0.97/0.91)。在内部一致性方面,量表的信度在中等至良好范围内,α 值在 0.52 至 0.67 之间,且在干预前条件下更强。在基于身体反应(一般和声音特异性)比较组时,症状的同时效度最强。

结论

该工具可以可靠地测量幼儿对噪声的情绪和身体反应。与成人和年龄较大的儿童一样,幼儿能够区分情绪反应、身体反应、应对策略和不适。需要对更大样本的学龄前儿童进行进一步研究,以进一步完善问题,特别是与幸福感相关的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ac/3657644/c87b6adc4798/bmjopen2012002408f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ac/3657644/254489545e13/bmjopen2012002408f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ac/3657644/c87b6adc4798/bmjopen2012002408f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ac/3657644/254489545e13/bmjopen2012002408f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ac/3657644/c87b6adc4798/bmjopen2012002408f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a questionnaire measuring preschool children's reactions to and coping with noise in a repeated measurement design.验证一份用于测量学龄前儿童在重复测量设计中对噪声的反应和应对的问卷。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002408.
2
The Others Are Too Loud! Children's Experiences and Thoughts Related to Voice, Noise, and Communication in Nordic Preschools.其他人太吵了!北欧幼儿园中儿童与声音、噪音及交流相关的经历和想法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 21;10:1954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01954. eCollection 2019.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Obesity related eating behaviour patterns in Swedish preschool children and association with age, gender, relative weight and parental weight--factorial validation of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire.瑞典学龄前儿童肥胖相关的饮食行为模式及其与年龄、性别、相对体重和父母体重的关系——儿童饮食行为问卷的因子验证。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Dec 8;8:134. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-134.
5
Preschool teachers' perspective on how high noise levels at preschool affect children's behavior.幼儿园教师对幼儿园高噪音水平如何影响儿童行为的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214464. eCollection 2019.
6
A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12-36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT.视频反馈式育儿干预预防 12-36 月龄高危儿童持久行为问题:健康启动,快乐启动 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(29):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta25290.
7
Evaluating parents' reactions to Children's stuttering using a Persian version of reaction to Speech Disfluency Scale.使用波斯语版言语不流畅反应量表评估父母对儿童口吃的反应。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;134:110076. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110076. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Psychometric validation of Emotional Reaction Instrument-English to measure American children's emotional responses to hospitalisation.用于测量美国儿童对住院治疗情绪反应的英文版情绪反应量表的心理测量学验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jun;23(11-12):1541-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04274.x. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Psychometric properties of the chinese version of autism spectrum quotient-children's version: A sex-specific analysis.中文版自闭症谱系商数儿童版的心理测量特性:性别特异性分析。
Autism Res. 2019 Feb;12(2):303-315. doi: 10.1002/aur.2053. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.

引用本文的文献

1
Listening effort in children and adults in classroom noise.在课堂噪声中儿童和成人的听力努力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):25200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76932-7.
2
Student's Self-Reported Experience of Soundscape: The Link between Noise, Psychological and Physical Well-Being.学生对声音景观的自我报告体验:噪声、心理和身体健康之间的联系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 11;21(1):0. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010084.
3
Exploring the role of soundscape in restorative experience: A pilot study from children's perspective.探索声景在恢复性体验中的作用:一项从儿童视角开展的初步研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Phenotypes of chronic fatigue syndrome in children and young people.儿童和青少年慢性疲劳综合征的表型。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):245-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.158162. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
2
Children's annoyance reactions to aircraft and road traffic noise.儿童对飞机和道路交通噪音的烦恼反应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):895-904. doi: 10.1121/1.3058635.
3
Child voice and noise: a pilot study of noise in day cares and the effects on 10 children's voice quality according to perceptual evaluation.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1131170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131170. eCollection 2023.
4
Differential Effects of Task-Irrelevant Monaural and Binaural Classroom Scenarios on Children's and Adults' Speech Perception, Listening Comprehension, and Visual-Verbal Short-Term Memory.任务无关的单耳和双耳教室场景对儿童和成人言语感知、听力理解和视-听短期记忆的差异影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):15998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315998.
5
Let the Children Listen: A First Approximation to the Sound Environment Assessment of Children through a Soundwalk Approach.让孩子们倾听:通过声音漫步法初步评估儿童的声音环境。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124185.
6
The Others Are Too Loud! Children's Experiences and Thoughts Related to Voice, Noise, and Communication in Nordic Preschools.其他人太吵了!北欧幼儿园中儿童与声音、噪音及交流相关的经历和想法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 21;10:1954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01954. eCollection 2019.
7
Preschool teachers' perspective on how high noise levels at preschool affect children's behavior.幼儿园教师对幼儿园高噪音水平如何影响儿童行为的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214464. eCollection 2019.
8
A screening approach for classroom acoustics using web-based listening tests and subjective ratings.一种使用基于网络的听力测试和主观评分的教室声学筛查方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 23;10(1):e0116572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116572. eCollection 2015.
J Voice. 2009 Sep;23(5):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.017. Epub 2008 May 5.
4
Urban road-traffic noise and blood pressure and heart rate in preschool children.城市道路交通噪音与学龄前儿童的血压及心率
Environ Int. 2008 Feb;34(2):226-31. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: a cross-national study.飞机与道路交通噪音及儿童认知与健康:一项跨国研究。
Lancet. 2005;365(9475):1942-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66660-3.
6
Cortisol reactivity is positively related to executive function in preschool children attending head start.在参加“提前开端计划”的学龄前儿童中,皮质醇反应性与执行功能呈正相关。
Child Dev. 2005 May-Jun;76(3):554-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00863.x.
7
The environment of childhood poverty.童年贫困的环境。
Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):77-92. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.77.
8
Prevention of adverse effects of noise on children.预防噪音对儿童的不良影响。
Noise Health. 2003 Apr-Jun;5(19):59-64.
9
Qualitative responses of children to environmental noise.儿童对环境噪音的定性反应。
Noise Health. 2003 Apr-Jun;5(19):19-30.
10
Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement.在使用探索性因素分析进行测量时最小化样本量。
J Nurs Meas. 2002 Fall;10(2):135-54. doi: 10.1891/jnum.10.2.135.52552.