Department of Applied Psychology.
Dev Psychol. 2014 Feb;50(2):554-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033647. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
In the current article, we contrast 2 analytical approaches to estimate the relation of parenting to executive function development in a sample of 1,292 children assessed longitudinally between the ages of 36 and 60 months of age. Children were administered a newly developed and validated battery of 6 executive function tasks tapping inhibitory control, working memory, and attention shifting. Residualized change analysis indicated that higher quality parenting as indicated by higher scores on widely used measures of parenting at both earlier and later time points predicted more positive gain in executive function at 60 months. Latent change score models in which parenting and executive function over time were held to standards of longitudinal measurement invariance provided additional evidence of the association between change in parenting quality and change in executive function. In these models, cross-lagged paths indicated that in addition to parenting predicting change in executive function, executive function bidirectionally predicted change in parenting quality. Results were robust with the addition of covariates, including child sex, race, maternal education, and household income-to-need. Strengths and drawbacks of the 2 analytic approaches are discussed, and the findings are considered in light of emerging methodological innovations for testing the extent to which executive function is malleable and open to the influence of experience.
在当前的文章中,我们对比了两种分析方法,以评估在一个 1292 名儿童样本中,父母教养方式与执行功能发展之间的关系。该样本在 36 至 60 个月的年龄间进行了纵向评估。儿童接受了一套新开发和验证的 6 项执行功能任务的测试,这些任务涉及抑制控制、工作记忆和注意力转换。残差变化分析表明,在早期和后期的时间点上,得分较高的更优质的父母教养方式(通过广泛使用的父母教养方式测量来衡量),预示着在 60 个月时执行功能有更积极的增益。在纵向测量不变性标准下,父母教养和执行功能随时间变化的潜在变化分数模型提供了父母教养质量变化与执行功能变化之间关联的额外证据。在这些模型中,交叉滞后路径表明,父母教养不仅可以预测执行功能的变化,执行功能也可以双向预测父母教养质量的变化。在加入了协变量(包括儿童性别、种族、母亲教育程度和家庭收入需求比)后,结果仍然稳健。讨论了这两种分析方法的优缺点,并结合新兴的方法学创新,考虑了执行功能的可塑性以及受经验影响的程度,对研究结果进行了讨论。