Department of Pulmonary Disease, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.
J Asthma Allergy. 2013 Jul 1;6:93-101. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S45269. Print 2013.
Despite the availability of new pharmacological options and novel combinations of existing drug therapies, the rate of suboptimal asthma control is still high. Therefore, early identification of the clinical and behavioral factors responsible for poor asthma control, and interventions during routine outpatient visits to improve asthma trigger management, are strongly recommended. This study was designed to evaluate the profiles of asthmatic patients and their inhaler treatment devices in relation to asthma control in Turkey.
A total of 572 patients with persistent asthma (mean [standard deviation] age: 42.7 [12.1] years; 76% female) were included in this prospective observational study. A baseline visit (0 month, visit 1) and three follow-up visits (1, 3 and 6 months after enrolment) were conducted to collect data on demographics, past medical and asthma history, and inhaler device use.
Asthma control was identified in 61.5% of patients at visit 1 and increased to 87.3% at visit 4 (P < 0.001), regardless of sociodemographics, asthma duration, body mass index or smoking status. The presence of asthma-related comorbidity had a significantly negative effect on asthma control (P = 0.004). A significant decrease was determined, in the rate of uncontrolled asthma, upon follow-up among patients who were using a variety of fixed dose combination inhalers (P < 0.001 for each). Logistic regression analysis was used to show that the presence of asthma-related comorbidity (odds ratio [OR], 0.602; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.419; 0.863, P = 0.006) and active smoking (OR, 0.522; 95% CI, 0.330; 0.825, P = 0.005) were significant predictors of asthma control.
Our findings indicate that, despite ongoing treatment, asthma control rate was 61.5% at visit 1 in adult outpatients with persistent asthma. However, by the final follow-up 6 months later, this had increased to 87.3%, independent of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Poor asthma control was associated with asthma-related comorbid diseases, while the efficacy of fixed dose combinations was evident in the achievement of asthma control.
尽管有新的药理学选择和现有药物治疗的新组合,但哮喘控制不佳的比率仍然很高。因此,强烈建议在常规门诊就诊期间尽早识别导致哮喘控制不佳的临床和行为因素,并进行干预,以改善哮喘触发因素的管理。本研究旨在评估土耳其哮喘患者的哮喘特征及其吸入器治疗装置与哮喘控制的关系。
本前瞻性观察研究共纳入 572 例持续性哮喘患者(平均[标准差]年龄:42.7[12.1]岁;76%为女性)。在基线访视(0 个月,访视 1)和 3 次随访(入组后 1、3 和 6 个月)期间收集人口统计学、既往医疗和哮喘病史以及吸入器使用数据。
在访视 1 时,61.5%的患者哮喘得到控制,在访视 4 时增加到 87.3%(P<0.001),无论社会人口统计学、哮喘持续时间、体重指数或吸烟状况如何。哮喘相关合并症的存在对哮喘控制有显著的负面影响(P=0.004)。在随访期间,使用各种固定剂量联合吸入器的患者中,未控制哮喘的比例显著下降(每次随访 P<0.001)。逻辑回归分析显示,哮喘相关合并症的存在(比值比[OR],0.602;95%置信区间[CI],0.419;0.863,P=0.006)和主动吸烟(OR,0.522;95%CI,0.330;0.825,P=0.005)是哮喘控制的显著预测因素。
我们的研究结果表明,尽管正在进行治疗,但在初诊时,门诊成年持续性哮喘患者的哮喘控制率为 61.5%。然而,在最终随访 6 个月后,这一比例增加到 87.3%,与社会人口统计学和临床特征无关。哮喘控制不佳与哮喘相关合并症有关,而固定剂量联合的疗效在实现哮喘控制方面是明显的。