• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Returns to Local-Area Healthcare Spending: Evidence from Health Shocks to Patients Far From Home.流向当地医疗保健支出的回流:来自患者远离家乡时健康冲击的证据。
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2011 Jul;3(3):221-243. doi: 10.1257/app.3.3.221.
2
Long-term returns to local health-care spending.地方医疗保健支出的长期回报。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar;26(2):153-182. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01695-x. Epub 2024 May 18.
3
Freestanding Emergency Department Entry and Market-level Spending on Emergency Care.独立急诊入口和急诊医疗市场支出
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;26(11):1221-1231. doi: 10.1111/acem.13848. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
4
Effectiveness of public health spending on infant mortality in Florida, 2001-2014.佛罗里达州 2001-2014 年公共卫生支出对婴儿死亡率的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.044. Epub 2018 May 26.
5
Variation in the Relationship between School Spending and Achievement: Progressive Spending Is Efficient.学校支出与学业成就之间关系的变化:渐进式支出是有效的。
AJS. 2022 Jul;128(1):189-223. doi: 10.1086/719956.
6
Variation in Physician Spending and Association With Patient Outcomes.医生支出的差异及其与患者预后的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):675-682. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0059.
7
Unraveling the drivers of regional variation in healthcare spending by analyzing prevalent chronic diseases.通过分析常见慢性病来揭示医疗保健支出地区差异的驱动因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 3;18(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3128-4.
8
Mortality reductions from marginal increases in public spending on health.公共卫生支出的少量增加即可降低死亡率。
Health Policy. 2018 Aug;122(8):892-899. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Geographic variation in Medicare and the military healthcare system.医疗保险和军事医疗保健系统的地域差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Aug 1;23(8):e259-e264.
10
Differences in Food-at-Home Spending for SNAP and Non-SNAP Households Given Geographic Price Variation.考虑到地理位置价格差异,SNAP 和非 SNAP 家庭在家庭食品支出上的差异。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jul;120(7):1142-1150.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Doing More with Less: Predicting Primary Care Provider Effectiveness.以更少投入实现更多成果:预测初级保健提供者的效能。
Rev Econ Stat. 2025 Mar;107(2):289-305. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01290. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
Is There a VA Advantage? Evidence from Dually Eligible Veterans.退伍军人事务部有优势吗?来自双重资格退伍军人的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2023 Nov;113(11):3003-3043. doi: 10.1257/aer.20211638.
3
Facility-Level Differences in Antipsychotic Drug Use: Impact on Quality Outcomes for Nursing Home Residents.抗精神病药物使用的机构层面差异:对疗养院居民质量结果的影响
Med Care. 2025 Mar 1;63(3):202-210. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002111. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
4
Long-term returns to local health-care spending.地方医疗保健支出的长期回报。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar;26(2):153-182. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01695-x. Epub 2024 May 18.
5
Regional variations in vaccination against COVID-19 in Germany.德国 COVID-19 疫苗接种的地区差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0296976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296976. eCollection 2024.
6
The unexpected costs of expertise: evidence from highly specialized physicians.专家的意外成本:来自高度专业化医生的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;12:1108254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1108254. eCollection 2024.
7
The Causal Effects of Place on Health and Longevity.环境对健康和长寿的因果影响。
J Econ Perspect. 2021 Fall;35(4):147-170. doi: 10.1257/jep.35.4.147.
8
Place-Based Drivers of Mortality: Evidence from Migration.基于地点的死亡驱动因素:来自移民的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2021 Aug;111(8):2697-2735. doi: 10.1257/aer.20190825.
9
Does When You Die Depend on Where You Live? Evidence from Hurricane Katrina.你的死亡时间取决于你的居住地吗?来自卡特里娜飓风的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2020 Nov;110(11):3602-3033. doi: 10.1257/aer.20181026.
10
Does waiting times decrease or increase operational costs in short and long-term? Evidence from Portuguese public hospitals.等待时间的缩短或延长是否会增加或减少短期和长期的运营成本?来自葡萄牙公立医院的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Nov;22(8):1195-1216. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01331-y. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Is American health care uniquely inefficient?美国的医疗保健是否特别低效?
J Econ Perspect. 2008 Fall;22(4):27-50. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.4.27.
2
Slowing the growth of health care costs--lessons from regional variation.减缓医疗保健成本的增长——区域差异带来的教训
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26;360(9):849-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0809794.
3
PRODUCTIVITY SPILLOVERS IN HEALTHCARE: EVIDENCE FROM THE TREATMENT OF HEART ATTACKS.医疗保健中的生产率溢出效应:来自心脏病治疗的证据
J Polit Econ. 2007;115:103-140. doi: 10.1086/512249.
4
Variations in hospital resource use for Medicare and privately insured populations in California.加利福尼亚州医疗保险和私人保险人群在医院资源使用方面的差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Mar-Apr;27(2):w123-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.w123. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
5
The lifetime costs and benefits of medical technology.医疗技术的终身成本与效益。
J Health Econ. 2007 Dec 1;26(6):1081-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
6
Cost effectiveness of adult intensive care in the UK.英国成人重症监护的成本效益。
Anaesthesia. 2007 Jun;62(6):547-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04997.x.
7
Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit.危重症患者从急诊科延迟转入重症监护病房的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1477-83. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266585.74905.5A.
8
Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.存在治疗选择偏倚时观察性研究的分析:使用倾向评分和工具变量法分析侵入性心脏管理对急性心肌梗死生存率的影响
JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):278-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.278.
9
National health spending in 2005: the slowdown continues.2005年的国家医疗支出:增速放缓仍在持续。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):142-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.142.
10
The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960-2000.1960年至2000年美国医疗支出的价值。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):920-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054744.

流向当地医疗保健支出的回流:来自患者远离家乡时健康冲击的证据。

Returns to Local-Area Healthcare Spending: Evidence from Health Shocks to Patients Far From Home.

作者信息

Doyle Joseph J

机构信息

MIT Sloan School of Management & NBER.

出版信息

Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2011 Jul;3(3):221-243. doi: 10.1257/app.3.3.221.

DOI:10.1257/app.3.3.221
PMID:23853699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3707795/
Abstract

Healthcare spending varies widely across markets, and previous empirical studies find little evidence that higher spending translates into better health outcomes. The main innovation in this paper exploits this cross-sectional variation in hospital spending in a new way by considering patients who are exposed to healthcare systems not designed for them: patients far from home when a health emergency strikes. Visitors to Florida who become ill in high-spending areas have significantly lower mortality rates compared to visitors in lower-spending areas. The results are robust within groups of similar visitors and within groups of destinations that appear to be close demand substitutes-areas that likely attract similar visitors.

摘要

医疗保健支出在不同市场之间差异很大,先前的实证研究几乎没有发现高支出能转化为更好的健康结果的证据。本文的主要创新之处在于,通过考虑那些接触到并非为他们设计的医疗系统的患者,以一种新的方式利用了医院支出的这种横截面差异:即健康紧急情况发生时远离家乡的患者。在高支出地区生病的佛罗里达游客的死亡率明显低于低支出地区的游客。在类似游客群体以及似乎是相近需求替代地的目的地群体(可能吸引类似游客的地区)中,结果都是稳健的。