Bradley T Gerard, Berzins David W, Valeri Nicholas, Pruszynski Jessica, Eliades Theodore, Katsaros Christos
*Department of Developmental Sciences, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA,
*Department of Developmental Sciences, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):290-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt048. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical, structural, and aesthetic properties of two types of aesthetic coated nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires compared with comparable regular NiTi wires in the as-received state and after clinical use.
MATERIALS/METHODS: Sixty one subjects were randomly assigned to four groups (N = 61), two groups of coated wires and two groups of comparable, non-coated controls (n = 15/group). The period in the mouth ranged from 4 to 12 weeks after insertion. In total, 121 wires (61 retrieved and 60 as-received) were used in the study. The percentages of coating retention and loss were extrapolated from scans. A brief survey of five questions with three choices was given to all patients. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and three-point bending tests were done on as-received and used wires.
The surface characterization by the percentage of resin remaining indicated that most wires in both test groups lost a significant amount of coating. A patient survey indicated that this was a noticeable feature for patients. DSC analysis of the wires indicated that the metallurgical properties of the coated wires were not similar to the uncoated wires in the as-received condition. Three-point bending results indicate a wide variation in test results with large standard deviations among all the groups.
The extent of coating loss requires investigating, as do the biological properties of the detached coating.
Both wires lost a significant amount of aesthetic coating after varying periods in the mouth. The metallurgical testing of these findings may indicate that these wires perform differently in the mouth.
背景/目的:本研究旨在比较两种美学涂层镍钛(NiTi)丝与未涂层的普通NiTi丝在初始状态及临床使用后的力学、结构和美学性能。
材料/方法:61名受试者被随机分为四组(N = 61),两组为涂层丝,两组为未涂层的对照丝(每组n = 15)。丝材植入口腔后的时间为4至12周。本研究共使用了121根丝材(61根回收丝材和60根初始丝材)。涂层保留率和损失率通过扫描推算得出。对所有患者进行了一个包含五个问题、每个问题有三个选项的简短调查。对初始丝材和使用后的丝材进行了差示扫描量热法(DSC)和三点弯曲试验。
通过树脂残留百分比进行的表面表征表明,两个试验组中的大多数丝材都损失了大量涂层。患者调查表明,这对患者来说是一个明显的特征。丝材的DSC分析表明,涂层丝材在初始状态下的冶金性能与未涂层丝材不同。三点弯曲结果表明,所有组的试验结果差异很大,标准差也很大。
涂层损失的程度以及脱落涂层的生物学特性都需要进一步研究。
两种丝材在口腔中放置不同时间后都损失了大量美学涂层。对这些结果的冶金测试可能表明,这些丝材在口腔中的性能有所不同。