Suppr超能文献

神经生理学对眼-脑联系的限制。

Neurophysiological constraints on the eye-mind link.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Southampton Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 15;7:361. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00361. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Several current computational models of eye-movement control in reading posit a tight link between the eye and mind, with lexical processing directly triggering most "decisions" about when to start programming a saccade to move the eyes from one word to the next. One potential problem with this theoretical assumption, however, is that it may violate neurophysiological constraints imposed by the time required to encode visual information, complete some amount of lexical processing, and then program a saccade. In this article, we review what has been learned about these timing constraints from studies using ERP and MEG. On the basis of this review, it would appear that the temporal constraints are too severe to permit direct lexical control of eye movements without a significant amount of parafoveal processing (i.e., pre-processing of word n+1 from word n). This conclusion underscores the degree to which the perceptual, cognitive, and motor processes involved in reading must be highly coordinated to support skilled reading, a par excellence example of a task requiring visual-cognitive expertise.

摘要

几种当前的阅读眼动控制计算模型认为眼睛和思维之间存在紧密联系,词汇处理直接触发了大多数关于何时开始规划眼球跳动以从一个单词移动到下一个单词的“决策”。然而,这种理论假设存在一个潜在问题,即它可能违反了由编码视觉信息、完成一定量的词汇处理以及规划眼球跳动所需的时间所施加的神经生理约束。在本文中,我们回顾了使用 ERP 和 MEG 研究得出的这些时间约束的知识。基于这一综述,似乎时间约束过于严格,如果没有大量的视距前处理(即,从单词 n 到单词 n+1 的预处理),则不允许直接通过词汇控制眼球运动。这一结论突出了阅读中涉及的感知、认知和运动过程必须高度协调以支持熟练阅读的程度,阅读是一个需要视觉认知专业知识的卓越任务的典范。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48cf/3710954/b22bfbdec9c1/fnhum-07-00361-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验