• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴侣导向情绪对社会交换决策的影响。

The effect of partner-directed emotion in social exchange decision-making.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Hull Hull, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 25;4:469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00469. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00469
PMID:23898313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3722477/
Abstract

Despite the prevalence of studies examining economic decision-making as a purely rational phenomenon, common sense suggests that emotions affect our decision-making particularly in a social context. To explore the influence of emotions on economic decision-making, we manipulated opponent-directed emotions prior to engaging participants in two social exchange decision-making games (the Trust Game and the Prisoner's Dilemma). Participants played both games with three different (fictional) partners and their tendency to defect was measured. Prior to playing each game, participants exchanged handwritten "essays" with their partners, and subsequently exchanged evaluations of each essay. The essays and evaluations, read by the participant, were designed to induce either anger, sympathy, or a neutral emotional response toward the confederate with whom they would then play the social exchange games. Galvanic skin conductance level (SCL) showed enhanced physiological arousal during anger induction compared to both the neutral and sympathy conditions. In both social exchange games, participants were most likely to defect against their partner after anger induction and least likely to defect after sympathy induction, with the neutral condition eliciting intermediate defection rates. This pattern was found to be strongest in participants exhibiting low cognitive control (as measured by a Go/no-Go task). The findings indicate that emotions felt toward another individual alter how one chooses to interact with them, and that this influence depends both on the specific emotion induced and the cognitive control of the individual.

摘要

尽管有大量研究将经济决策视为纯粹理性现象,但常识表明,情绪会影响我们的决策,尤其是在社会环境中。为了探究情绪对经济决策的影响,我们在参与者参与两个社会交换决策游戏(信任游戏和囚徒困境)之前,操纵了针对对手的情绪。参与者与三个不同的(虚构的)伙伴玩了这两个游戏,并测量了他们的背叛倾向。在玩每一个游戏之前,参与者与他们的伙伴交换手写的“文章”,然后交换对每篇文章的评价。这些文章和评价由参与者阅读,旨在引起他们将要与之玩社会交换游戏的对手的愤怒、同情或中性情绪反应。与中性和同情条件相比,皮肤电传导水平(SCL)在愤怒诱导时显示出增强的生理唤醒。在这两个社会交换游戏中,参与者在愤怒诱导后最有可能背叛他们的伙伴,而在同情诱导后最不可能背叛,中性条件则引起中等程度的背叛率。这种模式在表现出低认知控制(如通过 Go/No-Go 任务测量)的参与者中表现最强。研究结果表明,对另一个人的情绪会改变一个人与他们互动的方式,而这种影响既取决于所引起的特定情绪,也取决于个体的认知控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/8d52c96ce052/fpsyg-04-00469-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/0aad8252ac9c/fpsyg-04-00469-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/1ea5191ab0fc/fpsyg-04-00469-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/f8c58bd7283c/fpsyg-04-00469-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/0c9aef174803/fpsyg-04-00469-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/8d52c96ce052/fpsyg-04-00469-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/0aad8252ac9c/fpsyg-04-00469-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/1ea5191ab0fc/fpsyg-04-00469-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/f8c58bd7283c/fpsyg-04-00469-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/0c9aef174803/fpsyg-04-00469-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ce/3722477/8d52c96ce052/fpsyg-04-00469-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of partner-directed emotion in social exchange decision-making.伴侣导向情绪对社会交换决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 25;4:469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00469. eCollection 2013.
2
Left Amygdala and Putamen Activation Modulate Emotion Driven Decisions in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game.左侧杏仁核与壳核激活在重复囚徒困境博弈中调节情绪驱动的决策。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 17;13:741. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00741. eCollection 2019.
3
People's dispositional cooperative tendencies towards robots are unaffected by robots' negative emotional displays in prisoner's dilemma games.在囚徒困境游戏中,人们对机器人的合作倾向不因机器人的负面情绪表现而受到影响。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Aug;36(5):995-1019. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2054781. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Exploring the impact of positive and negative emotions on cooperative behaviour in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game.探讨积极情绪和消极情绪对囚徒困境游戏中合作行为的影响。
PeerJ. 2013 Dec 19;1:e231. doi: 10.7717/peerj.231.
5
The influence of cooperation and defection on social decision making in depression: A study of the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game.合作与背叛对抑郁症患者社会决策的影响:重复囚徒困境博弈研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Cocaine use disorder in females is associated with altered social decision-making: a study with the prisoner's dilemma and the ultimatum game.女性可卡因使用障碍与社会决策改变有关:囚徒困境和最后通牒游戏的研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2198-0.
7
MDMA Increases Cooperation and Recruitment of Social Brain Areas When Playing Trustworthy Players in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.MDMA 增加了在迭代囚徒困境中与可信赖玩家一起玩时的合作和社交脑区的招募。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;39(2):307-320. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1276-18.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
8
Emotional and Social Factors influence Poker Decision Making Accuracy.情感和社会因素会影响扑克决策的准确性。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):933-47. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9454-5.
9
A probabilistic map of emotional experiences during competitive social interactions.竞争社会互动中情绪体验的概率图谱。
Nat Commun. 2022 Mar 31;13(1):1718. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29372-8.
10
Chimpanzees Rarely Settle on Consistent Patterns of Play in the Hawk Dove, Assurance, and Prisoner's Dilemma Games, in a Token Exchange Task.在一个代币交换任务中,黑猩猩在鹰鸽博弈、确信博弈和囚徒困境博弈中很少会形成一致的游戏模式。
Anim Behav Cogn. 2019 Feb;6(1):48-70. doi: 10.26451/abc.06.01.04.2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Verbal Suggestion Modulates the Sense of Ownership and Heat Pain Threshold During the "Injured" Rubber Hand Illusion.言语暗示在“受伤”橡皮手错觉期间调节自我所有权感和热痛阈值。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Apr 25;16:837496. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.837496. eCollection 2022.
2
Navigating Motivation: A Semantic and Subjective Atlas of 7 Motives.《动机导航:七种动机的语义与主观图谱》
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 27;11:568064. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568064. eCollection 2020.
3
Left Amygdala and Putamen Activation Modulate Emotion Driven Decisions in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive control and individual differences in economic ultimatum decision-making.经济最后通牒决策中的认知控制与个体差异。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027107. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
2
Skin conductance response to the pain of others predicts later costly helping.他人痛苦引发的皮肤电反应能够预测后续的高代价助人行为。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022759. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
3
Tenderness and sympathy: distinct empathic emotions elicited by different forms of need.温柔与同情:不同形式的需求引发的两种截然不同的共情情绪。
左侧杏仁核与壳核激活在重复囚徒困境博弈中调节情绪驱动的决策。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 17;13:741. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00741. eCollection 2019.
4
Caring Cooperators and Powerful Punishers: Differential Effects of Induced Care and Power Motivation on Different Types of Economic Decision Making.关爱合作者与强有力的惩罚者:诱导关怀和权力动机对不同类型经济决策的差异化影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11580-8.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 May;37(5):614-25. doi: 10.1177/0146167211403157.
4
Now that I'm sad, it's hard to be mad: the role of cognitive appraisals in emotional blunting.现在我很难生气了:认知评价在情绪迟钝中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;36(11):1467-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167210384710. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
5
Predicting behavior in economic games by looking through the eyes of the players.通过观察玩家的视角来预测经济游戏中的行为。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):743-55. doi: 10.1037/a0020280.
6
Gratitude as moral sentiment: emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange.感激作为道德情感:经济交换中的情感引导合作。
Emotion. 2010 Apr;10(2):289-93. doi: 10.1037/a0017883.
7
Does empathy trigger only altruistic motivation? How about selflessness or justice?同理心只会引发利他动机吗?那无私或正义呢?
Emotion. 2008 Dec;8(6):766-74. doi: 10.1037/a0013967.
8
Beyond fear: rapid spatial orienting toward positive emotional stimuli.超越恐惧:对积极情绪刺激的快速空间定向。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):362-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02094.x.
9
That baby caught my eye... attention capture by infant faces.那个婴儿吸引了我的目光……婴儿的面孔具有注意力捕获效应。
Emotion. 2007 Aug;7(3):685-9. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.685.
10
Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain.人类大脑中的框架、偏差与理性决策
Science. 2006 Aug 4;313(5787):684-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1128356.