Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 30;7:412. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00412. eCollection 2013.
Isolated reports have long suggested a similarity in content and thought processes across mind wandering (MW) during waking, and dream mentation during sleep. This overlap has encouraged speculation that both "daydreaming" and dreaming may engage similar brain mechanisms. To explore this possibility, we systematically examined published first-person experiential reports of MW and dreaming and found many similarities: in both states, content is largely audiovisual and emotional, follows loose narratives tinged with fantasy, is strongly related to current concerns, draws on long-term memory, and simulates social interactions. Both states are also characterized by a relative lack of meta-awareness. To relate first-person reports to neural evidence, we compared meta-analytic data from numerous functional neuroimaging (PET, fMRI) studies of the default mode network (DMN, with high chances of MW) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (with high chances of dreaming). Our findings show large overlaps in activation patterns of cortical regions: similar to MW/DMN activity, dreaming and REM sleep activate regions implicated in self-referential thought and memory, including medial prefrontal cortex (PFC), medial temporal lobe structures, and posterior cingulate. Conversely, in REM sleep numerous PFC executive regions are deactivated, even beyond levels seen during waking MW. We argue that dreaming can be understood as an "intensified" version of waking MW: though the two share many similarities, dreams tend to be longer, more visual and immersive, and to more strongly recruit numerous key hubs of the DMN. Further, whereas MW recruits fewer PFC regions than goal-directed thought, dreaming appears to be characterized by an even deeper quiescence of PFC regions involved in cognitive control and metacognition, with a corresponding lack of insight and meta-awareness. We suggest, then, that dreaming amplifies the same features that distinguish MW from goal-directed waking thought.
孤立的报告长期以来表明,在清醒时的漫游(MW)和睡眠时的梦境思维中,内容和思维过程存在相似性。这种重叠促使人们猜测,“白日梦”和做梦可能涉及相似的大脑机制。为了探索这种可能性,我们系统地检查了已发表的关于 MW 和做梦的第一人称经验报告,并发现了许多相似之处:在这两种状态下,内容主要是视听和情感的,遵循松散的叙述,带有幻想色彩,与当前的关注点密切相关,利用长期记忆,并模拟社交互动。这两种状态的特点都是相对缺乏元意识。为了将第一人称报告与神经证据联系起来,我们比较了来自许多功能神经影像学(PET、fMRI)默认模式网络(MW 可能性高)和快速眼动(REM)睡眠(做梦可能性高)研究的元分析数据。我们的发现表明,皮质区域的激活模式存在很大重叠:与 MW/默认模式网络活动相似,做梦和 REM 睡眠激活了与自我参照思维和记忆相关的区域,包括内侧前额叶皮层(PFC)、内侧颞叶结构和后扣带。相反,在 REM 睡眠中,许多 PFC 执行区域被去激活,甚至超过了清醒时 MW 的水平。我们认为,做梦可以被理解为清醒时 MW 的“强化”版本:尽管两者有许多相似之处,但梦境往往更长、更具视觉和沉浸感,并且更强烈地招募了许多默认模式网络的关键枢纽。此外,MW 比目标导向的思维招募的 PFC 区域更少,而做梦似乎表现出与认知控制和元认知相关的 PFC 区域更深的静息状态,相应地缺乏洞察力和元意识。因此,我们认为,做梦放大了区分 MW 和目标导向的清醒思维的相同特征。