University of South Florida, Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, Tampa, FL 33612-3805, USA.
Eat Behav. 2013 Aug;14(3):390-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 May 22.
Emerging evidence signifies the co-occurrence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with clinical and sub-threshold disordered eating behaviors. However, many existing studies have assessed this co-occurrence among inpatient or intensive outpatient populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the co-occurrence of ADHD with clinical eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors in a nationally representative sample via a secondary data analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (n = 4,862; 2,243 males; 2,619 females). Results reveal that females have higher rates of co-occurrence of ADHD and diagnosed eating disorders than males (1.05% vs. 0.20%, p < .01). When controlling for age and race, ADHD predicted diagnosed eating disorders in females (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.06; 95% CI: 1.09-3.88; p < .05), but did not predict diagnosed eating disorders in males. With regard to disordered eating behaviors, when controlling for age, gender, and race, ADHD significantly predicted disordered eating behaviors (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.21-2.74). When stratifying by type of disordered eating behavior, ADHD predicted binging and/or purging behavior (OR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.78-4.61), but not restrictive behaviors. Implications of study findings pertain to both secondary/targeted prevention efforts in addition to tertiary prevention via patient-specific treatment plans.
新出现的证据表明,注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与临床和亚阈值饮食障碍行为同时存在。然而,许多现有研究都是在住院或强化门诊人群中评估这种共病情况。本研究的目的是通过对全国青少年健康纵向研究(n=4862;男性 2243 人;女性 2619 人)的数据进行二次数据分析,在全国代表性样本中检查 ADHD 与临床饮食障碍和饮食障碍行为的共病情况。结果表明,女性 ADHD 与诊断性饮食障碍的共病率高于男性(1.05%比 0.20%,p<.01)。在控制年龄和种族后,ADHD 预测女性诊断性饮食障碍(发病率比(IRR):2.06;95%可信区间(CI):1.09-3.88;p<.05),但不预测男性诊断性饮食障碍。关于饮食障碍行为,在控制年龄、性别和种族后,ADHD 显著预测饮食障碍行为(OR:1.82;95% CI:1.21-2.74)。当按饮食障碍行为的类型分层时,ADHD 预测暴食和/或催吐行为(OR:2.86;95% CI:1.78-4.61),但不预测限制行为。研究结果的意义涉及到二级/有针对性的预防工作,以及通过针对患者的治疗计划进行三级预防。