Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland ; Psychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 1;7:427. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00427. eCollection 2013.
Deficits in inhibitory control, the ability to suppress ongoing or planned motor or cognitive processes, contribute to many psychiatric and neurological disorders. The rehabilitation of inhibition-related disorders may therefore benefit from neuroplasticity-based training protocols aiming at normalizing inhibitory control proficiency and the underlying brain networks. Current literature on training-induced behavioral and brain plasticity in inhibitory control suggests that improvements may follow either from the development of automatic forms of inhibition or from the strengthening of top-down, controlled inhibition. Automatic inhibition develops in conditions of consistent and repeated associations between inhibition-triggering stimuli and stopping goals. Once established, the stop signals directly elicit inhibition, thereby bypassing slow, top-down executive control and accelerating stopping processes. In contrast, training regimens involving varying stimulus-response associations or frequent inhibition failures prevent the development of automatic inhibition and thus strengthen top-down inhibitory processes rather than bottom-up ones. We discuss these findings in terms of developing optimal inhibitory control training regimens for rehabilitation purposes.
抑制控制缺陷,即抑制正在进行或计划中的运动或认知过程的能力,与许多精神和神经疾病有关。因此,基于神经可塑性的训练方案可能会从抑制相关障碍的康复中受益,这些方案旨在使抑制控制能力和潜在的大脑网络正常化。关于抑制控制的训练诱导的行为和大脑可塑性的现有文献表明,改善可能来自于自动抑制形式的发展,也可能来自于自上而下的、受控抑制的增强。自动抑制在抑制触发刺激和停止目标之间存在一致和重复关联的情况下发展。一旦建立,停止信号直接引发抑制,从而绕过缓慢的、自上而下的执行控制并加速停止过程。相比之下,涉及变化的刺激-反应关联或频繁抑制失败的训练方案会阻止自动抑制的发展,从而增强自上而下的抑制过程,而不是自下而上的过程。我们根据为康复目的开发最佳抑制控制训练方案的角度来讨论这些发现。