• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区代表参与临床和转化科学奖获得者的活动。

Community representatives' involvement in Clinical and Translational Science Awardee activities.

机构信息

Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):292-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12072. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1111/cts.12072
PMID:23919364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3884765/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand the formal roles of community representatives (CRs) in Clinical and Translational Science Awardee (CTSA) activities, to evaluate the extent of integration into the organizational and governance structures and to identify barriers to effective integration.

METHODS

The inventory tool was distributed to each of the 60 CTSAs using a secure web application.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (78%) completed the inventory. The mean number of CRs per CTSA is 21.4 (SD: 14.8). Most CTSAs had community advisory boards (89%) and 94% included CRs in Community Engagement (CE) cores. Only 11% reported a CR being a member of the CTSA leadership team and 19% reported that CRs advise core programs beyond CE. CRs are compensated by 79% of CTSAs. Mean annual compensation is $753 (median: $400). Compensation directly correlated with the number of hours that CRs worked in CTSA activities (r = 0.64; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This inventory allows CTSAs to better understand how CRs have engaged in activities and brings attention to the limited representation among cores and in leadership roles. CTSAs should, with substantive input from CRs, develop strategies to provide the resources and compensation necessary to better integrate the community in CTSA activities and fully realize the goals of the CTSA vision.

摘要

目的

了解社区代表(CRs)在临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)活动中的正式角色,评估其融入组织和治理结构的程度,并确定有效融入的障碍。

方法

使用安全的网络应用程序向每个 CTSA 分发清单工具。

结果

共有 47 个(78%)完成了清单。每个 CTSA 的平均 CR 数量为 21.4(SD:14.8)。大多数 CTSA 设有社区咨询委员会(89%),94%的委员会在社区参与(CE)核心中纳入了 CR。只有 11%的报告称 CR 是 CTSA 领导团队的成员,19%的报告称 CR 对 CE 以外的核心项目提供建议。79%的 CTSA 向 CR 提供薪酬。平均年薪为 753 美元(中位数:400 美元)。薪酬与 CR 在 CTSA 活动中的工作时间直接相关(r = 0.64;P = 0.001)。

结论

本清单使 CTSA 能够更好地了解 CR 如何参与活动,并引起人们对核心和领导角色中代表性有限的关注。CTSA 应在 CR 的实质性投入下,制定战略,提供必要的资源和薪酬,以更好地将社区融入 CTSA 活动,并充分实现 CTSA 愿景的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de02/5350834/a3e8e91dfb03/CTS-6-292-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de02/5350834/1afb3d29aaff/CTS-6-292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de02/5350834/a3e8e91dfb03/CTS-6-292-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de02/5350834/1afb3d29aaff/CTS-6-292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de02/5350834/a3e8e91dfb03/CTS-6-292-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Community representatives' involvement in Clinical and Translational Science Awardee activities.社区代表参与临床和转化科学奖获得者的活动。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):292-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12072. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
2
Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers.将实践为基础的研究网络与临床与转化科学奖联系起来:学术健康中心进行社区参与的新机会。
Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):476-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd2ed3.
3
Nurse engagement and contributions to the clinical and translational science awards initiative.护士的参与及其对临床与转化科学奖倡议的贡献。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Jun;6(3):191-5. doi: 10.1111/cts.12020. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
4
Faculty Participation in and Needs around Community Engagement within a Large Multiinstitutional Clinical and Translational Science Awardee.大型多机构临床与转化科学奖获得者中教师对社区参与的参与情况及相关需求
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):506-12. doi: 10.1111/cts.12314. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
The Evolving Collaborative Relationship between Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) and Clinical and Translational Science Awardees (CTSAs).基于实践的研究网络(PBRNs)与临床和转化科学奖获得者(CTSAs)之间不断发展的合作关系。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Oct;1(5):301-309. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.305. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
6
Emergency Medicine Resources Within the Clinical Translational Science Institutes: A Cross-sectional Study.临床转化科学研究所内的急诊医学资源:一项横断面研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):740-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12926. Epub 2016 May 14.
7
Community engagement in the CTSA program: stakeholder responses from a national Delphi process.社区参与临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)项目:全国德尔菲法流程中利益相关者的反馈
Clin Transl Sci. 2014 Jun;7(3):191-5. doi: 10.1111/cts.12158. Epub 2014 May 20.
8
Understanding the supports of and challenges to community engagement in the CTSAs.了解临床与转化科学奖(CTSAs)中社区参与的支持因素和挑战。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Apr;8(2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/cts.12205. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
9
Defining and Measuring Community Engagement and Community-Engaged Research: Clinical and Translational Science Institutional Practices.界定与衡量社区参与及社区参与研究:临床与转化科学机构实践
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(2):145-156. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0034.
10
CTSA-IP: a solution to identifying and aggregating intellectual property across the NIH Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium of biomedical research institutes.CTSA-IP:一种用于确定和聚合美国国立卫生研究院临床转化科学奖(CTSA)联盟内生物医学研究所知识产权的解决方案。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):328-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00308.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing community members' engagement in cancer research: the making research CLEAR program.提高社区成员对癌症研究的参与度:“让研究清晰明了”项目
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00741-z.
2
2021 Community Engagement Studio Virtual Training Summit: Increasing the Diversity of Stakeholders Engaged in Research.2021 年社区参与工作室虚拟培训峰会:增加参与研究的利益相关者的多样性。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(2):277-285.
3
What's in This For You? What's in This For Me?: A Win-Win Perspective of Involving Study Advisory Committee Members in Palliative Care Research.

本文引用的文献

1
No longer simply a Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) health improvement networks.不再仅仅是基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)健康改善网络。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;24(5):485-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.110102.
2
Realizing the promise of community-based participatory research: community partners get organized!实现基于社区的参与性研究的前景:社区合作伙伴开始组织起来!
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Winter;1(4):291-4. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0034.
3
Clinical and translational science awards and community engagement: now is the time to mainstream prevention into the nation's health research agenda.
这对你有什么好处?这对我有什么好处?:让研究咨询委员会成员参与姑息治疗研究的双赢视角。
J Patient Exp. 2024 Jan 2;11:23743735231224562. doi: 10.1177/23743735231224562. eCollection 2024.
4
The community voices program to facilitate community-academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program's usefulness.促进社区与学术研究人员合作的社区声音项目:利益相关者对该项目实用性的看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 20;7(1):e237. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.657. eCollection 2023.
5
Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.转变领域:学术健康中心在促进和维持基于公平的社区参与式研究中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1111779. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111779. eCollection 2023.
6
Community engagement strategies to promote recruitment and participation in clinical research among rural communities: A narrative review.促进农村社区参与临床研究招募与参与的社区参与策略:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):e84. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.16. eCollection 2023.
7
Institutional Review Board Use of Outside Experts: A National Survey.机构审查委员会使用外部专家:一项全国性调查。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):251-262. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090459. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
Racism and perinatal health inequities research: where we have been and where we should go.种族主义和围产期健康不平等研究:我们的过去和未来。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;227(4):560-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.033. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Parental Guidance Suggested: Engaging Parents as Partners in Research Studies of Genomic Screening for a Pediatric Population.建议家长指导:让家长成为儿科人群基因组筛查研究的合作伙伴。
Front Genet. 2022 Mar 25;13:867030. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867030. eCollection 2022.
10
Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research.适应概念框架,让不同利益相关者参与基因组/精准医学研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1478-1485. doi: 10.1111/hex.13486. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
临床和转化科学奖与社区参与:现在是将预防纳入国家卫生研究议程主流的时候了。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Nov;37(5):464-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.018.
4
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
5
Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research.学术人员和临床医生参与社区参与式合作研究的策略。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):407-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.407.
6
Clinical research at a crossroads: the NIH roadmap.临床研究处于十字路口:美国国立卫生研究院路线图。
J Investig Med. 2006 May;54(4):171-3. doi: 10.2310/6650.2006.X0016.
7
Clinical and translational science awards: a framework for a national research agenda.临床与转化科学奖:国家研究议程框架
Transl Res. 2006 Jul;148(1):4-5. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2006.05.001.
8
Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision.转化医学与临床科学——开启新视野之时。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 13;353(15):1621-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb053723. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
9
Medicine. The NIH Roadmap.医学。美国国立卫生研究院路线图。
Science. 2003 Oct 3;302(5642):63-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1091867.
10
Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.国家临床研究事业面临的核心挑战。
JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278.