Suppr超能文献

沟通对信念影响的综合模型。

An integrated model of communication influence on beliefs.

机构信息

School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14088-95. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212742110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

Abstract

How do people develop and maintain their beliefs about science? Decades of social science research exist to help us answer this question. The Integrated Model of Communication Influence on Beliefs presented here combines multiple theories that have considered aspects of this process into a comprehensive model to explain how individuals arrive at their scientific beliefs. In this article, we (i) summarize what is known about how science is presented in various news and entertainment media forms; (ii) describe how individuals differ in their choices to be exposed to various forms and sources of communication; (iii) discuss the implications of how individuals mentally process information on the effects of communication; (iv) consider how communication effects can be altered depending on background characteristics and motivations of individuals; and (v) emphasize that the process of belief formation is not unidirectional but rather, feeds back on itself over time. We conclude by applying the Integrated Model of Communication Influence on Beliefs to the complex issue of beliefs about climate change.

摘要

人们如何形成和维持他们对科学的信念?数十年来的社会科学研究致力于帮助我们回答这个问题。这里提出的“沟通对信念影响的综合模型”将考虑这一过程各个方面的多个理论结合到一个综合模型中,以解释个体如何形成他们的科学信念。在本文中,我们:(i)总结了关于科学在各种新闻和娱乐媒体形式中呈现方式的已知内容;(ii)描述了个体在选择接触各种形式和来源的沟通时的差异;(iii)讨论了个体在心理处理信息方面的差异对沟通效果的影响;(iv)考虑了如何根据个体的背景特征和动机来改变沟通效果;以及 (v)强调信念形成的过程不是单向的,而是随着时间的推移会自我反馈。最后,我们将“沟通对信念影响的综合模型”应用于气候变化信念这一复杂问题。

相似文献

1
An integrated model of communication influence on beliefs.沟通对信念影响的综合模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14088-95. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212742110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
Bridging the gap between science and decision making.弥合科学与决策之间的差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14055-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213532110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
3
Assessing what to address in science communication.评估科学传播中需要解决的问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14062-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212729110. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
New media landscapes and the science information consumer.新媒体环境与科学信息消费者
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14096-101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212744110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.科学与媒体之间的差距再探讨:科学家作为公众传播者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14102-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212745110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
6
Communicating science in politicized environments.在政治化环境下传播科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14048-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212726110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
Communicating science in social settings.在社会环境中传播科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14040-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213275110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.将价值观和深思熟虑融入科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14081-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212740110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

3
Comparing beliefs in falsehoods based on satiric and non-satiric news.比较基于讽刺和非讽刺新闻的虚假信仰。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0278639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278639. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

5
Most people are not WEIRD.大多数人并非怪异之人。
Nature. 2010 Jul 1;466(7302):29. doi: 10.1038/466029a.
9
10
The case for motivated reasoning.动机性推理的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):480-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验