• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估科学传播中需要解决的问题。

Assessing what to address in science communication.

机构信息

Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14062-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212729110. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1212729110
PMID:23942122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3752171/
Abstract

As members of a democratic society, individuals face complex decisions about whether to support climate change mitigation, vaccinations, genetically modified food, nanotechnology, geoengineering, and so on. To inform people's decisions and public debate, scientific experts at government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and other organizations aim to provide understandable and scientifically accurate communication materials. Such communications aim to improve people's understanding of the decision-relevant issues, and if needed, promote behavior change. Unfortunately, existing communications sometimes fail when scientific experts lack information about what people need to know to make more informed decisions or what wording people use to describe relevant concepts. We provide an introduction for scientific experts about how to use mental models research with intended audience members to inform their communication efforts. Specifically, we describe how to conduct interviews to characterize people's decision-relevant beliefs or mental models of the topic under consideration, identify gaps and misconceptions in their knowledge, and reveal their preferred wording. We also describe methods for designing follow-up surveys with larger samples to examine the prevalence of beliefs as well as the relationships of beliefs with behaviors. Finally, we discuss how findings from these interviews and surveys can be used to design communications that effectively address gaps and misconceptions in people's mental models in wording that they understand. We present applications to different scientific domains, showing that this approach leads to communications that improve recipients' understanding and ability to make informed decisions.

摘要

作为民主社会的一员,个人在是否支持气候变化缓解、疫苗接种、转基因食品、纳米技术、地球工程等方面面临着复杂的决策。为了为人们的决策和公共辩论提供信息,政府机构、非政府组织和其他组织的科学专家旨在提供易懂且科学准确的沟通材料。这些沟通旨在提高人们对决策相关问题的理解,如果需要,还可以促进行为改变。不幸的是,当科学专家缺乏人们做出更明智决策所需了解的信息,或者缺乏人们用来描述相关概念的措辞时,现有的沟通有时会失败。我们为科学专家提供了一个介绍,说明如何使用心智模型研究与目标受众进行沟通,以告知他们的沟通工作。具体来说,我们描述了如何进行访谈,以描述人们对所考虑主题的决策相关信念或心智模型,识别他们知识中的差距和误解,并揭示他们偏爱的措辞。我们还描述了使用更大样本进行后续调查的方法,以检查信念的普遍性以及信念与行为的关系。最后,我们讨论了如何利用这些访谈和调查的结果来设计沟通,有效地解决人们心智模型中的差距和误解,并使用他们理解的措辞。我们介绍了不同科学领域的应用,表明这种方法可以改善收件人的理解能力,并帮助他们做出明智的决策。

相似文献

1
Assessing what to address in science communication.评估科学传播中需要解决的问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14062-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212729110. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
2
Informing Public Perceptions About Climate Change: A 'Mental Models' Approach.公众气候变化认知的信息传递:“心理模型”方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Oct;23(5):1369-1386. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9816-8. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
3
Bridging the gap between science and decision making.弥合科学与决策之间的差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14055-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213532110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
4
Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.将价值观和深思熟虑融入科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14081-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212740110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
The sciences of science communication.科学传播学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14033-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213273110. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
6
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
7
An integrated model of communication influence on beliefs.沟通对信念影响的综合模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14088-95. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212742110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
8
The role of initial affective impressions in responses to educational communications: the case of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).初始情感印象在对教育传播的反应中的作用:以碳捕获与封存(CCS)为例。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014 Jun;20(2):126-35. doi: 10.1037/xap0000008. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
9
Communicating scientific uncertainty.传达科学的不确定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13664-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317504111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
10
Communicating science in politicized environments.在政治化环境下传播科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14048-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212726110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Invitation appeals and STEM academic scientists research participation: Findings from six survey experiments.邀请吸引力与STEM领域学术科学家的研究参与度:六项调查实验的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0326331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326331. eCollection 2025.
2
Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding.有数字素养的人不太可能受到常规科学报道的影响:科学推理和因果误解的关键作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00641-6.
3
Best Practices for Communicating Nutrition and Brain Health Science.营养与大脑健康科学交流的最佳实践
Nutr Today. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):74-81. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000744. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
4
Eliciting stock market expectations: The effects of question wording on survey experience and response validity.引出股市预期:问题措辞对调查体验和回答有效性的影响。
J Behav Financ. 2018;19(1):101-110. doi: 10.1080/15427560.2017.1373353. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Application of Citizen Science to Sheep as a Model to Sensitize Young Citizens to Biodiversity, Animal Welfare and the Social Utility of Research.公民科学在绵羊身上的应用:以此为模型让年轻公民认识生物多样性、动物福利及研究的社会效用。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 14;15(2):201. doi: 10.3390/ani15020201.
6
Medicare Part D beneficiaries' self-reported barriers to switching plans and making plan comparisons at all.医疗保险D部分受益人的自我报告的在更换计划以及进行计划比较方面存在的障碍。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 2;2(11):qxae141. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae141. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Measured air quality impacts after teaching parents about cooking ventilation with a video: a pilot study.通过视频向家长传授烹饪通风知识后所测得的空气质量影响:一项试点研究。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;35(2):223-232. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00730-6. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
8
Non-STEM majors COVID-19 vaccine impressions improve, and misconceptions resolve, after podcast assignment.非STEM专业学生在完成播客任务后,对新冠疫苗的印象有所改善,误解也得以消除。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Aug 29;25(2):e0003423. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00034-23. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
9
: a training program to increase evidence-based science communication and literacy for Hispanic high school and undergraduate students.一个旨在提高西班牙裔高中生和本科生基于证据的科学传播能力和科学素养的培训项目。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Aug 29;25(2):e0004024. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00040-24. Epub 2024 May 21.
10
Six areas of consideration when designing and conducting online surveys in microbiology for facilitating improved scientific communication.在微生物学领域设计和开展在线调查以促进科学交流改善时需考虑的六个方面。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Dec 5;14:1288822. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1288822. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive mapping tools: review and risk management needs.认知绘图工具:综述与风险管理需求。
Risk Anal. 2012 Aug;32(8):1333-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01767.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
2
Public perceptions of hurricane modification.公众对飓风改造的看法。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32(7):1194-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01717.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
3
Thinking aloud is not a form of introspection but a qualitatively different methodology: reply to Schooler (2011).自言自语不是内省的一种形式,而是一种性质不同的方法论:回复 Schooler(2011)。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;137(2):351-4. doi: 10.1037/a0022388.
4
Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings.公众对能源消耗和节约的看法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16054-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001509107. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
5
Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies.有碳捕集与封存(CCS)和其他低碳技术的电力组合的知情公众偏好。
Risk Anal. 2010 Sep;30(9):1399-410. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01436.x.
6
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.加权kappa系数:用于衡量名义尺度上的一致性,并考虑了尺度不一致或部分得分的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256.
7
Expert judgments of pandemic influenza risks.甲型流感大流行风险的专家判断。
Glob Public Health. 2006;1(2):178-93. doi: 10.1080/17441690600673940.
8
Parents' vaccination comprehension and decisions.父母对疫苗接种的理解与决策。
Vaccine. 2008 Mar 17;26(12):1595-607. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
9
Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base.大流行性流感的非药物公共卫生干预措施:证据基础评估
BMC Public Health. 2007 Aug 15;7:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-208.
10
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.成人决策能力的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):938-956. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938.