Department of Radiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1611 NW 12th Ave, JMH WW 279, Miami, FL, 33136, USA,
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Nov;42(11):1583-92. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1703-7. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
To investigate the accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping for characterizing soft tissue masses (STMs) as cysts or solid masses.
This IRB-approved retrospective study included 36 subjects with 37 STMs imaged by conventional MRI (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences) and DWI (b-values 50, 400, 800 s/mm(2)) with ADC mapping. STMs were defined as non-solid cysts by histology or clinical follow-up, and as solid by histology. For each STM, ADC values (range, mean) were recorded by two observers. Differences between ADC values in cysts and solid STMs were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
There were higher minimum (1.65 vs 0.68, p = 0.003) and mean (2.31 vs 1.45, p = 0.005) ADC values in cysts than solid STMs respectively. Areas under the ROC for minimum and mean ADC values were 0.82 and 0.81 respectively. Using threshold ADC values of 1.8 (minimum) or 2.5 (mean) yielded a sensitivity of 60 % and 80 % respectively, and a specificity of 100 % for classifying a STM as a cyst; for tumors with high fluid-signal intensity, the performance of these threshold values was maintained.
Diffusion-weighted imaging with ADC mapping provides a non-contrast MRI alternative for the characterization of STMs as cysts or solid masses. Threshold ADC values exist that provide 100 % specificity for differentiating cysts and solid STMs, even for tumors of high fluid-signal intensity on T2-weighted images.
研究表观扩散系数(ADC)图定量扩散加权成像(DWI)对软组织肿块(STM)的囊性或实性特征的准确性。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准,回顾性纳入 36 例患者的 37 个 STM,这些患者行常规 MRI(T1 加权、T2 加权、增强 T1 加权序列)和 DWI(b 值为 50、400、800 s/mm2)检查,其中包括 ADC 图。通过组织学或临床随访将 STM 定义为非实性囊肿,通过组织学定义为实性肿瘤。对于每个 STM,由两位观察者记录 ADC 值(范围,均值)。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析比较囊肿和实性 STM 的 ADC 值差异。
与实性 STM 相比,囊肿的最小 ADC 值(1.65 比 0.68,p=0.003)和平均 ADC 值(2.31 比 1.45,p=0.005)均较高。最小和平均 ADC 值的 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.82 和 0.81。当最小 ADC 值为 1.8(阈值)或平均 ADC 值为 2.5(阈值)时,区分 STM 为囊肿的敏感性分别为 60%和 80%,特异性为 100%;对于 T2 加权像上具有高液体信号强度的肿瘤,这些阈值的性能仍然成立。
ADC 图 DWI 为 STM 的囊性或实性特征提供了一种无需对比剂的 MRI 替代方法。存在阈值 ADC 值,可 100%特异性地区分囊肿和实性 STM,即使对于 T2 加权像上具有高液体信号强度的肿瘤也是如此。