Round Jeff, Sampson Elizabeth L, Jones Louise
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Mental Health Sciences Unit, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House St, London, W1W 7EJ, UK,
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):477-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0500-z. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
The wide range of tools and methods developed for measuring and valuing health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluations are appropriate for use in most populations. However, for certain populations, specific tools may need to be developed to reflect the particular needs of that population. Patients without capacity--particularly patients with severe dementia--are such a population. At present, the tools available to economists for measuring and valuing quality of life in these patients lack validity. Here, we seek to understand the framework within which common instruments have been developed, critique these instruments with respect to patients with severely restricted capacity and to develop a new way of thinking about how to value health-related quality of life in such patients.
In this essay, we describe and critique the conceptual framework by which common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life have been developed.
We show that current common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life in general populations are not appropriate for populations with severely restricted capacity.
We propose a new framework for thinking about quality of life in this population, based on notions of observable person-centred outcomes and utility derived from processes of care.
为经济评估而开发的用于测量和评估与健康相关的生活质量的广泛工具和方法适用于大多数人群。然而,对于某些特定人群,可能需要开发特定的工具以反映该人群的特殊需求。无行为能力的患者——尤其是重度痴呆患者——就是这样一群人。目前,经济学家用于测量和评估这些患者生活质量的工具缺乏有效性。在此,我们试图理解通用工具开发所依据的框架,针对能力严重受限的患者对这些工具进行批判,并探索一种新的方式来思考如何评估此类患者与健康相关的生活质量。
在本文中,我们描述并批判了用于测量和评估生活质量的通用工具所依据的概念框架。
我们表明,当前用于测量和评估一般人群生活质量的通用工具不适用于能力严重受限的人群。
我们基于可观察的以患者为中心的结果以及护理过程产生的效用的概念,提出了一个思考该人群生活质量的新框架。