• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于鉴定肠杆菌科成员的Titertek-Enterobac自动化系统(TTE-AS)的评估

Evaluation of the Titertek-Enterobac-Automated System (TTE-AS) for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

作者信息

Kämpfer P

机构信息

Fachgebiet Hygiene, Technischen Universität Berlin.

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1990 Jun;273(2):164-72. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80244-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80244-6
PMID:2400532
Abstract

The Titertek-Enterobac-Automated System (TTE-AS, Flow Laboratories, Meckenheim, FRG) was evaluated for identification of members of the family of Enterobacteriaceae using a total of 816 bacterial strains obtained from stock cultures and clinical specimens. A comparison of the results of the TTE-AS kit with conventional methods was conducted. Identifications were classified as correct, not identified (two or more taxa possible, identification score less than 80%, supplementary tests for final identification were not performed), and incorrect. Correct identification results were further subdivided according to the level of identification by species or biotype: (a) greater than or equal to 98%, (b) 90% to 97%, (c) 80% to 89%. When compared with conventional identification results, the TTE-AS system correctly identified 95.3% (778 of 816 strains), 90.0% (734 strains) belonging to category (a), 3.4% (28 strains) belonging to category (b), and 2.0% (16 strains) belonging to category (c). For 18 (2.2%) of the remaining strains, the system generated the correct identification result, but with an identification level less than 80% (low discrimination results). 11 strains (1.3%) were misidentified and the system failed to generate identification results with 9 strains (1.1%). Reactions within TTE-AS were reproducible with an estimated probability of erroneous test results of 1.7%.

摘要

使用从保藏培养物和临床标本中获得的总共816株细菌菌株,对Titertek-Enterobac自动系统(TTE-AS,德国美肯海姆弗洛实验室)进行了评估,以鉴定肠杆菌科成员。将TTE-AS试剂盒的结果与传统方法进行了比较。鉴定结果分为正确、未鉴定(可能有两个或更多分类单元,鉴定分数低于80%,未进行最终鉴定的补充试验)和错误。正确的鉴定结果根据按种或生物型的鉴定水平进一步细分:(a)大于或等于98%,(b)90%至97%,(c)80%至89%。与传统鉴定结果相比,TTE-AS系统正确鉴定了95.3%(816株中的778株),其中90.0%(734株)属于(a)类,3.4%(28株)属于(b)类,2.0%(16株)属于(c)类。对于其余18株(2.2%)菌株,该系统得出了正确的鉴定结果,但鉴定水平低于80%(鉴别结果低)。11株(1.3%)被误鉴定,该系统未能对9株(1.1%)菌株产生鉴定结果。TTE-AS内的反应具有可重复性,错误测试结果的估计概率为1.7%。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Titertek-Enterobac-Automated System (TTE-AS) for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科成员的Titertek-Enterobac自动化系统(TTE-AS)的评估
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1990 Jun;273(2):164-72. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80244-6.
2
Evaluation of the Titertek-NF system for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌的Titertek-NF系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1201-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1201-1205.1989.
3
Comparative evaluation of the new Titertek Enterobac Rapid Automated System (TTE-RAS) for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.新型Titertek肠杆菌快速自动化系统(TTE-RAS)用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的比较评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):741-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.741-743.1986.
4
[TTE-RAS (Titertek-Enterobac-Ras), a new micromethod for the semi-automatic identification of Enterobacteriaceae within 5 hours].[TTE-RAS(提特泰克-肠杆菌-RAS),一种在5小时内半自动鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的新微量方法]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1987;45(4):419-22.
5
Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of medically relevant gram-negative rods.评估VITEK 2系统对医学相关革兰氏阴性杆菌的快速鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):1948-52. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.1948-1952.1998.
6
Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study.肠杆菌科的多点鉴定:英国微生物技术学会合作研究报告
J Clin Pathol. 1993 Jul;46(7):637-41. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.7.637.
7
Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A system for rapid (2-hour) identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.评估autoSCAN-W/A系统用于快速(2小时)鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1541-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1541-1543.1992.
8
[Evaluation of a new semi-automatic method of identifying enterobacteriaceae, M.I.S.-Enterobacteriaceae].
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1989;47(4):207-12.
9
[Assessment of a new four-hour diagnostic kit--RapID onE system for the identification of enteric bacteria].[一种新型四小时诊断试剂盒——用于鉴定肠道细菌的RapID onE系统的评估]
Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1994 Aug;27(3):133-9.
10
Evaluation of an automated system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacilli.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵菌的自动化系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;18(12):902-7. doi: 10.1007/s100960050429.

引用本文的文献

1
Description of Cohnella rhizoplanae sp. nov., isolated from the root surface of soybean (Glycine max).从大豆(Glycine max)根际分离的根际科恩氏菌新种的描述。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2024 Dec 24;118(2):41. doi: 10.1007/s10482-024-02051-y.
2
Paenibacillus plantiphilus sp. nov. from the plant environment of Zea mays.来自玉米植物环境的植物芽胞杆菌新种。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2023 Sep;116(9):883-892. doi: 10.1007/s10482-023-01852-x. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Paenibacillus allorhizoplanae sp. nov. from the rhizoplane of a Zea mays root.
玉米根际的类根瘤菌属新种(Paenibacillus allorhizoplanae sp. nov.)。
Arch Microbiol. 2022 Sep 18;204(10):630. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03225-w.
4
Microbiological characterization of a fuel-oil contaminated site including numerical identification of heterotrophic water and soil bacteria.受污染燃油场地的微生物特性分析,包括异养水和土壤细菌的数值鉴定。
Microb Ecol. 1991 Dec;21(1):227-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02539156.
5
Glycosidase profiles of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.肠杆菌科成员的糖苷酶谱。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Dec;29(12):2877-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.12.2877-2879.1991.