Befera Nicholas T, Badea Cristian T, Johnson G Allan
Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3302, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Mol Imaging Biol. 2014 Apr;16(2):235-45. doi: 10.1007/s11307-013-0686-z.
The objective of this study was to compare a new generation of four-dimensional micro-single photon emission computed tomography (microSPECT) with microCT for the quantitative in vivo assessment of murine cardiac function.
Four-dimensional isotropic cardiac images were acquired from anesthetized normal C57BL/6 mice with either microSPECT (n = 6) or microCT (n = 6). One additional mouse with myocardial infarction (MI) was scanned with both modalities. Prior to imaging, mice were injected with either technetium tetrofosmin for microSPECT or a liposomal blood pool contrast agent for microCT. Segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) was performed using Vitrea (Vital Images) software, to derive global and regional function.
Measures of global LV function between microSPECT and microCT groups were comparable (e.g., ejection fraction = 71 ± 6 % microSPECT and 68 ± 4 % microCT). Regional functional indices (wall motion, wall thickening, regional ejection fraction) were also similar for the two modalities. In the mouse with MI, microSPECT identified a large perfusion defect that was not evident with microCT.
Despite lower spatial resolution, microSPECT was comparable to microCT in the quantitative evaluation of cardiac function. MicroSPECT offers an advantage over microCT in the ability to evaluate simultaneously myocardial radiotracer distribution and function, simultaneously. MicroSPECT should be considered as an alternative to microCT and magnetic resonance for preclinical cardiac imaging in the mouse.
本研究的目的是比较新一代四维微型单光子发射计算机断层扫描(microSPECT)与微型计算机断层扫描(microCT)对小鼠心脏功能进行体内定量评估的效果。
对麻醉后的正常C57BL/6小鼠,分别用microSPECT(n = 6)或microCT(n = 6)采集四维各向同性心脏图像。另外对一只心肌梗死(MI)小鼠用两种方法进行扫描。在成像前,给小鼠注射用于microSPECT的替曲膦或用于microCT的脂质体血池造影剂。使用Vitrea(Vital Images)软件对左心室(LV)进行分割,以得出整体和局部功能。
microSPECT组和microCT组之间的左心室整体功能测量结果具有可比性(例如,射血分数:microSPECT为71±6%,microCT为68±4%)。两种方法的局部功能指标(壁运动、壁增厚、局部射血分数)也相似。在心肌梗死小鼠中,microSPECT发现了一个大的灌注缺损,而microCT未显示。
尽管空间分辨率较低,但在心脏功能的定量评估方面,microSPECT与microCT相当。microSPECT在同时评估心肌放射性示踪剂分布和功能方面比microCT具有优势。在小鼠临床前心脏成像中,应考虑将microSPECT作为microCT和磁共振成像的替代方法。