• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创骶髂关节融合术:18例患者的一年随访结果

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 18 patients.

作者信息

Cummings John, Capobianco Robyn A

机构信息

SI-BONE Inc,, 3055 Olin Ave, Suite 2200, San Jose, CA 95128, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013 Sep 16;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-7-12.

DOI:10.1186/1750-1164-7-12
PMID:24040944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852345/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SI) pain is an often-overlooked cause of low back pain due, in part, to lack of specific findings on radiographs and symptoms mimicking other back-related disorders. We report our experience with minimally invasive (MIS) SI joint arthrodesis using a series of triangular, titanium plasma spray (TPS) coated implants in patients refractory to conservative care.

METHODS

We report outcomes from 18 patients with 12 months of postoperative follow-up.Demographics, complications, and clinical outcomes using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for back function and SF-12 for quality of life were collected preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Mean age was 64 years and 67% of patients were female. There were no intraoperative complications and one explant at three months for malposition.All patient-reported outcomes showed both clinically and statistically significant improvement at 12 months (p < 0.001 for each of the following): VAS improved by 6.6 points, ODI scores improved by -37.5 points. One year SF-12 physical and mental component (PCS, MCS) scores approximated population normal scores for both physical and mental functioning. Patient satisfaction with outcomes was high at 95%; 89% said would have the same surgery again.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS SI joint fusion using a series of triangular porous TPS coated titanium implants is a safe and effective procedure for patients with SI joint disorders who have failed conservative care.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节(SI)疼痛是下腰痛一个常被忽视的原因,部分原因是X线片缺乏特异性表现以及症状与其他背部相关疾病相似。我们报告了使用一系列三角形钛等离子喷涂(TPS)涂层植入物对保守治疗无效的患者进行微创(MIS)骶髂关节融合术的经验。

方法

我们报告了18例患者术后12个月的随访结果。术前以及术后3个月、6个月和12个月收集患者的人口统计学资料、并发症情况以及使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估背部功能和SF-12评估生活质量的临床结果。

结果

平均年龄为64岁,67%的患者为女性。术中无并发症,1例患者在术后3个月因位置不当进行了植入物取出。所有患者报告的结果在12个月时均显示出临床和统计学上的显著改善(以下各项p均<0.001):VAS改善了6.6分,ODI评分改善了-37.5分。一年时SF-12身体和心理成分(PCS、MCS)评分接近人群身体和心理功能的正常评分。患者对结果的满意度很高,为95%;89%的患者表示愿意再次接受相同的手术。

结论

对于保守治疗失败的骶髂关节疾病患者,使用一系列三角形多孔TPS涂层钛植入物进行MIS骶髂关节融合术是一种安全有效的手术方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6a/3852345/997720811bf8/1750-1164-7-12-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6a/3852345/2b4521ceaf76/1750-1164-7-12-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6a/3852345/997720811bf8/1750-1164-7-12-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6a/3852345/2b4521ceaf76/1750-1164-7-12-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6a/3852345/997720811bf8/1750-1164-7-12-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 18 patients.微创骶髂关节融合术:18例患者的一年随访结果
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013 Sep 16;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-7-12.
2
One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis.使用一系列三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的一年疗效:一项多中心、患者层面的分析。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Aug 28;7:299-304. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S56491. eCollection 2014.
3
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.三角钛植入物微创性骶髂关节融合术:一项前瞻性研究。
Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):257-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562912. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
4
Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性及6个月疗效:一项前瞻性研究。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2013 Dec 13;6:219-29. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S55197. eCollection 2013.
5
Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.使用三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的五年临床和影像学结果。
Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 17;8:375-83. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010375. eCollection 2014.
6
Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数是衡量骶髂关节治疗反应的有效指标吗?
Qual Life Res. 2016 Feb;25(2):283-292. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1095-3. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
7
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.使用三角形钛植入物与非手术治疗的骶髂关节融合术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的六个月结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 5;9:6. doi: 10.14444/2006. eCollection 2015.
8
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.一项关于使用三角形钛植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗的随机对照试验的六个月结果。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):708-719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9. Epub 2016 May 14.
9
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合术:微创骶髂关节融合手术后一年的临床及影像学结果
Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:679-689. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010679. eCollection 2016.
10
Randomized Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Compared with Conservative Management for Chronic Low Back Pain Attributed to the Sacroiliac Joint.随机对照试验:骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗慢性下腰痛伴骶髂关节病变的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):400-411. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00022.

引用本文的文献

1
The Bedrock technique with triangular titanium rods for spinopelvic fixation and sacroiliac joint fusion: is there a learning curve?采用三角形钛棒进行脊柱骨盆固定和骶髂关节融合的基岩技术:是否存在学习曲线?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jul 23;35(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04431-0.
2
Insertional torque and pullout strength of reinserted screws for sacroiliac joint fusion: Effects of implant dimensions, bone density, and tapping.骶髂关节融合术中重新植入螺钉的插入扭矩和拔出强度:植入物尺寸、骨密度和攻丝的影响
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 May 29;23:100623. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100623. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of postmarket complaints database for the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System®: a minimally invasive treatment for degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruption.iFuse骶髂关节融合系统®上市后投诉数据库分析:一种治疗退行性骶髂关节炎和骶髂关节脱位的微创疗法
Med Devices (Auckl). 2013 May 29;6:77-84. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S44690. Print 2013.
2
MIS Fusion of the SI Joint: Does Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Affect Patient Outcomes?骶髂关节的微创融合术:既往腰椎融合术会影响患者的预后吗?
Open Orthop J. 2013 May 17;7:163-8. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010163. Print 2013.
3
The percutaneous stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: a prospective outcome study.
Clinical outcome measures following lateral versus posterior sacroiliac joint fusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
骶髂关节外侧与后侧融合术后的临床结局指标:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 12;5:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104212. eCollection 2025.
4
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
5
Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.微创经皮骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛的效用:文献系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):974-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08629-4. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
6
Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion: current insights and a comprehensive literature review.微创骶髂关节融合术:当前见解与全面文献综述
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;54(6):1185-1191. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5898. eCollection 2024.
7
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
8
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用三角形钛植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术与骶髂关节功能障碍的非手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Surg. 2024 Jan 26;67(1):E16-E26. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004523. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
9
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
10
Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的双中心观察性研究:一年结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 28;17(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03466-x.
采用中空模块化锚固螺钉经皮稳定骶髂关节:一项前瞻性结果研究。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2325-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2825-2. Epub 2013 May 18.
4
Outcome of percutaneous sacroiliac joint fixation with porous plasma-coated triangular titanium implants: an independent review.采用多孔等离子涂层三角形钛植入物经皮骶髂关节固定术的结果:一项独立评估
Open Orthop J. 2013;7:51-6. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010051. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
5
One year successful outcomes for novel sacroiliac joint arthrodesis system.新型骶髂关节融合系统的一年成功疗效
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2012 Dec 27;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-6-13.
6
A systematic evaluation of prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliac joint interventions.对骶髂关节介入治疗的流行率和诊断准确性的系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2012 May-Jun;15(3):E305-44.
7
Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.测定融合延伸治疗相邻节段病变后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
8
Etiology of chronic low back pain in patients having undergone lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术后慢性下腰痛的病因。
Pain Med. 2011 May;12(5):732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01098.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
9
Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: findings using dual sacroiliac joint blocks.腰骶融合术后骶髂关节痛:采用双骶髂关节阻滞的发现。
Pain Med. 2011 Apr;12(4):565-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01087.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
10
Defining "complications" in spine surgery: neurosurgery and orthopedic spine surgeons' survey.脊柱手术中“并发症”的定义:神经外科与骨科脊柱外科医生的调查
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Dec;23(8):493-500. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c11f89.