• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值作为系统性红斑狼疮炎症标志物的作用。

The role of neutrophyl lymphocyte count ratio as an inflammatory marker in systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Oehadian Amaylia, Suryadinata Hendarsyah, Dewi Sumartini, Pramudyo Riardi, Alisjahbana Bachti

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Padjadjaran University - Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia.

出版信息

Acta Med Indones. 2013 Jul;45(3):170-4.

PMID:24045385
Abstract

AIM

to evaluate neutrophyl lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) as an inflammatory marker in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

this was a cross sectional study involving 21 SLE patients with mild and moderate disease activity according to Mex SLEDAI score and 30 normal subjects. White blood cells counts were examined with Sysmex XE-5000. The absolute neutrophyl count and absolute lymphocyte count were tabulated and compared between SLE and normal subjects using unpaired t-test. The comparison of NLCR between SLE and normal subject was calculated using Mann-Whitney test. This study was conducted in the Department of Internal Medicine Hasan Sadikin Hospital from November 2011 until January 2012.

RESULTS

there was no significant difference in absolute neutrophyl count between SLE and normal subjects (4158+1517 vs 4031+1218 /mm3, p=0.74). The absolute lymphocyte count was significantly lower in SLE than normal subjects (1721+600 vs 2397+587/mm3, p=0.000). NLCR was significantly higher in SLE than normal subjects (2.52 (1.01-10.92) vs 1.65 (0.77-4.59), p=0.007). There was no significant difference in NLCR between SLE with mild and moderate activity (2.59 (1.01-10.92) vs 2.01 (1.38-3.98), p= 0.412). Based on ROC curve, with AUC 0.727, cut off NLCR value >1.93 had 70% sensitivity and 67% specificity in differentiating between SLE and normal subjects.

CONCLUSION

NLCR could be used as simple inflammatory parameter in SLE.

摘要

目的

评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值(NLCR)作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)炎症标志物的价值。

方法

本研究为横断面研究,纳入21例根据墨西哥SLE疾病活动指数(Mex SLEDAI)评分判定为轻、中度疾病活动的SLE患者及30名正常对照者。采用Sysmex XE - 5000检测白细胞计数。将SLE患者与正常对照者的中性粒细胞绝对值和淋巴细胞绝对值列表,并采用非配对t检验进行比较。采用Mann - Whitney检验计算SLE患者与正常对照者之间NLCR的差异。本研究于2011年11月至2012年1月在哈山·萨迪金医院内科进行。结果:SLE患者与正常对照者的中性粒细胞绝对值无显著差异(4158±1517 vs 4031±1218/mm³,p = 0.74)。SLE患者的淋巴细胞绝对值显著低于正常对照者(1721±600 vs 2397±587/mm³,p = 0.000)。SLE患者的NLCR显著高于正常对照者(2.52(1.01 - 10.92)vs 1.65(0.77 - 4.59),p = 0.007)。轻度和中度活动的SLE患者之间NLCR无显著差异(2.59(1.01 - 10.92)vs 2.01(1.38 - 3.98),p = 0.412)。基于ROC曲线,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.727,NLCR值>1.93在区分SLE患者与正常对照者时,敏感度为70%,特异度为67%。结论:NLCR可作为SLE的一种简单炎症参数。

相似文献

1
The role of neutrophyl lymphocyte count ratio as an inflammatory marker in systemic lupus erythematosus.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值作为系统性红斑狼疮炎症标志物的作用。
Acta Med Indones. 2013 Jul;45(3):170-4.
2
Cut off point of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of active disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为系统性红斑狼疮活动指标的截断点。
Lupus. 2020 Oct;29(12):1566-1570. doi: 10.1177/0961203320950822. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)与系统性红斑狼疮患者的疾病活动度相关。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2016 Jul;36:94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
Anti-nucleosome antibodies as a disease activity marker in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.抗核小体抗体作为系统性红斑狼疮患者的疾病活动标志物。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2009 Jul;12(2):100-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2009.01391.x.
5
Serum leptin levels in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮女性患者的血清瘦素水平
Rheumatol Int. 2002 Aug;22(4):138-41. doi: 10.1007/s00296-002-0216-9. Epub 2002 Jun 27.
6
[Serum level of selected chemokines in systemic lupus erythematosus patients taking into consideration the peripheral blood leukocyte counts].[考虑外周血白细胞计数的系统性红斑狼疮患者血清中特定趋化因子水平]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 May;34(203):251-4.
7
Circulating endothelial cells, endothelial apoptosis and soluble markers of endothelial dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus-related vasculitis.系统性红斑狼疮相关血管炎患者的循环内皮细胞、内皮细胞凋亡及内皮功能障碍的可溶性标志物
Int Angiol. 2009 Jun;28(3):192-201.
8
The Tie2 receptor antagonist angiopoietin-2 in systemic lupus erythematosus: its correlation with various disease activity parameters.系统性红斑狼疮中 Tie2 受体拮抗剂血管生成素-2:与各种疾病活动参数的相关性。
Immunol Invest. 2012;41(8):864-75. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2012.711407. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
9
The severity of systemic lupus erythematosus negatively correlates with the increasing number of CD4+CD25(high)FoxP3+ regulatory T cells during repeated plasmapheresis treatments of patients.在对系统性红斑狼疮患者进行重复血浆置换治疗期间,疾病的严重程度与CD4+CD25(高表达)FoxP3+调节性T细胞数量的增加呈负相关。
Autoimmunity. 2007 Nov;40(7):521-8. doi: 10.1080/08916930701610028.
10
Neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio as an early indicator of blood stream infection in the emergency department.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值作为急诊科血流感染的早期指标。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jul;32(7):531-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204071. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between advanced lung cancer inflammation index and acute gouty arthritis in Dalian, China: a cross-sectional study.中国大连晚期肺癌炎症指数与急性痛风性关节炎之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Front Nutr. 2025 Feb 14;12:1511642. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1511642. eCollection 2025.
2
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts the Disease Activity in Patients with Paediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值可预测儿童系统性红斑狼疮患者的疾病活动度:一项观察性横断面研究
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2024 Jan 31;35(4):634-638. doi: 10.31138/mjr.040923.ntl. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in systemic lupus erythematosus.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值在系统性红斑狼疮中的诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):170. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01438-5.
4
Can neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio be a non-invasive indicator of the presence of duodenal ulcer related in dyspeptic patients?中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值能否作为消化不良患者十二指肠溃疡相关性的非侵入性指标?
Pract Lab Med. 2023 Jun 25;36:e00319. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2023.e00319. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Correlation of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) with gout activity: A monocentric and retrospective study.中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和平均血小板体积(MPV)与痛风活动的相关性:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30242. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030242.
6
Can Complete Blood Count Picture Tell Us More About the Activity of Rheumatological Diseases?血常规检查结果能让我们更多地了解风湿性疾病的活动情况吗?
Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 22;15:11795441221089182. doi: 10.1177/11795441221089182. eCollection 2022.
7
Relationship between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与系统性红斑狼疮的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Apr 17;75:e1450. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1450. eCollection 2020.
8
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Mean Platelet Volume as Inflammatory Indicators in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Nephritis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及平均血小板体积作为系统性红斑狼疮性肾炎的炎症指标
Arch Rheumatol. 2016 Aug 17;32(1):21-25. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.5886. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Development of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Mortality in Gouty Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Are They Associated With Mean Platelet Volume and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio? A Comparative Study.痛风性关节炎和类风湿性关节炎患者动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病死亡率的发展:它们与平均血小板体积和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值有关吗?一项比较研究。
Arch Rheumatol. 2017 Feb 1;32(1):39-45. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6033. eCollection 2017 Mar.
10
Red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio as a disease activity-associated factor in systemic lupus erythematosus.红细胞分布宽度与血小板比值作为系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动相关因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12342. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012342.