Bang Heejung, Chiu Ya-Lin, Kaufman Jay S, Patel Mehul D, Heiss Gerardo, Rose Kathryn M
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University ofCalifornia, Davis, CA, USA.
J Stat Theory Pract. 2013 Jan 1;7(2):381-400. doi: 10.1080/15598608.2013.772830.
Measurement error/misclassification is commonplace in research when variable(s) can notbe measured accurately. A number of statistical methods have been developed to tackle this problemin a variety of settings and contexts. However, relatively few methods are available to handlemisclassified categorical exposure variable(s) in the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Inthis paper, we aim to review and compare different methods to handle this problem - naïvemethods, regression calibration, pooled estimation, multiple imputation, corrected score estimation,and MC-SIMEX - by simulation. These methods are also applied to a life course study with recalleddata and historical records. In practice, the issue of measurement error/misclassification should beaccounted for in design and analysis, whenever possible. Also, in the analysis, it could be moreideal to implement more than one correction method for estimation and inference, with properunderstanding of underlying assumptions.
当变量无法被准确测量时,测量误差/错误分类在研究中很常见。已经开发了许多统计方法来在各种设置和背景下解决这个问题。然而,在Cox比例风险回归模型中,用于处理错误分类的分类暴露变量的方法相对较少。在本文中,我们旨在通过模拟回顾和比较处理这个问题的不同方法——简单方法、回归校准、合并估计、多重填补、校正得分估计和MC-SIMEX。这些方法也应用于一项使用回忆数据和历史记录的生命历程研究。在实践中,只要有可能,在设计和分析中都应考虑测量误差/错误分类问题。此外,在分析中,对潜在假设要有适当的理解,实施多种校正方法进行估计和推断可能会更理想。