Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e76354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076354. eCollection 2013.
Benefits of skills lab training are widely accepted, but there is sparse research on its long-term effectiveness. We therefore conducted a prospective, randomised controlled-trial to investigate whether in a simulated setting students trained according to a "best practice" model (BPSL) perform two skills of different complexity (nasogastral tube insertion, NGT; intravenous cannulation, IVC) better than students trained with a traditional "see one, do one" teaching approach (TRAD), at follow-up of 3 or 6 months.
94 first-year medical students were randomly assigned to one of four groups: BPSL training or TRAD teaching with follow-up at 3 (3M) or 6 (6M) months. BPSL included structured feedback, practice on manikins, and Peyton's "Four-Step-Approach", while TRAD was only based on the "see one - do one" principle. At follow-up, manikins were used to assess students' performance by two independent blinded video-assessors using binary checklists and a single-item global assessment scale. BPSL students scored significantly higher immediately after training (NGT: BPSL3M 94.8%±0.2 and BPSL6M 95.4%±0.3 percentage of maximal score ± SEM; TRAD3M 86.1%±0.5 and TRAD6M 84.7%±0.4. IVC: BPSL3M 86.4%±0.5 and BPSL6M 88.0%±0.5; TRAD3M 73.2%±0.7 and TRAD6M 72.5%±0.7) and lost significantly less of their performance ability at each follow-up (NGT: BPSL3M 86.3%±0.3 and TRAD3M 70.3%±0.6; BPSL6M 89.0%±0.3 and TRAD6M 65.4%±0.6; IVC: BPSL3M 79.5%±0.5 and TRAD3M 56.5%±0.5; BPSL6M 73.2%±0.4 and TRAD6M 51.5%±0.8). In addition, BPSL students were more often rated clinically competent at all assessment times. The superiority at assessment after training was higher for the more complex skill (IVC), whereas NGT with its lower complexity profited more with regard to long-term retention.
This study shows that within a simulated setting BPSL is significantly more effective than TRAD for skills of different complexity assessed immediately after training and at follow-up. The advantages of BPSL training are seen especially in long-term retention.
技能实验室培训的好处已被广泛认可,但关于其长期效果的研究却很少。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,以调查在模拟环境中,按照“最佳实践”模型(BPSL)进行培训的学生是否比按照传统“见一、做一”教学方法(TRAD)进行培训的学生在 3 或 6 个月的随访时,在两项不同复杂程度的技能(鼻胃管插入,NGT;静脉穿刺,IVC)上表现更好。
94 名一年级医学生被随机分配到四个组之一:BPSL 培训或 TRAD 教学,随访 3(3M)或 6(6M)个月。BPSL 包括结构化反馈、在模型上练习和 Peyton 的“四步法”,而 TRAD 仅基于“见一、做一”的原则。在随访时,两名独立的盲法视频评估员使用二项式检查表和单项整体评估量表,通过使用模型来评估学生的表现。BPSL 学生在培训后立即得分显著更高(NGT:BPSL3M 94.8%±0.2 和 BPSL6M 95.4%±0.3 百分比最高得分±SEM;TRAD3M 86.1%±0.5 和 TRAD6M 84.7%±0.4。IVC:BPSL3M 86.4%±0.5 和 BPSL6M 88.0%±0.5;TRAD3M 73.2%±0.7 和 TRAD6M 72.5%±0.7),并且在每次随访时的表现能力损失显著更少(NGT:BPSL3M 86.3%±0.3 和 TRAD3M 70.3%±0.6;BPSL6M 89.0%±0.3 和 TRAD6M 65.4%±0.6;IVC:BPSL3M 79.5%±0.5 和 TRAD3M 56.5%±0.5;BPSL6M 73.2%±0.4 和 TRAD6M 51.5%±0.8)。此外,在所有评估时间,BPSL 学生被评为更具临床能力的可能性更高。培训后评估的优势在更复杂的技能(IVC)中更高,而较低复杂性的 NGT 则在长期保留方面获益更多。
这项研究表明,在模拟环境中,BPSL 比 TRAD 在培训后立即和随访时评估的不同复杂程度的技能更有效。BPSL 培训的优势尤其体现在长期保留方面。