School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland,
Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;183(3):405-10. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1028-5. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
The past decade has seen the widespread introduction of universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) programmes worldwide. Regrettably, such a programme is only now in the process of nationwide implementation in the Republic of Ireland and has been largely restricted to one screening modality for initial testing; namely transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). The aim of this study is to analyse the effects of employing a different screening protocol which utilises an alternative initial test, automated auditory brainstem response (AABR), on referral rates to specialist audiology services.
A retrospective analysis was performed of all neonatal hearing screening in Letterkenny General Hospital over 5 years, from January 2008 to December 2012, which was confined to infants possessing one or more known risk factors for permanent childhood hearing impairment. 1,163 infants were screened using AABR during this period and subsequent re-test and referral rates to specialist audiology services were examined.
Of the infants screened, 50 (4.3 %) failed the initial AABR. A further 16 of these (32 %) failed the repeat AABR, resulting in an overall referral rate to specialist audiology services of 1.38 %.
Our results demonstrate strikingly low overall referral rates in this cohort, falling well below both the international benchmark and the initial results of the Irish UNHS programme. This provides a convincing argument for examining AABR as a potential alternative to TEOAE in the nationwide UNHS.
过去十年,全世界广泛引入了新生儿普遍听力筛查(UNHS)计划。遗憾的是,爱尔兰共和国目前才开始全国范围内实施这一计划,且主要局限于一种初始测试模式,即瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)。本研究旨在分析采用不同筛查方案的效果,该方案使用替代初始测试(即自动听性脑干反应(AABR))对转介至专科听力学服务的比率的影响。
对 Letterkenny 综合医院 2008 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月的 5 年新生儿听力筛查进行回顾性分析,筛查仅限于具有一个或多个永久性儿童听力损伤已知危险因素的婴儿。在此期间,使用 AABR 对 1163 名婴儿进行了筛查,检查了随后的重新测试和转介至专科听力学服务的比率。
在接受筛查的婴儿中,有 50 名(4.3%)初次 AABR 未通过。其中有 16 名(32%)再次 AABR 失败,导致总体转介至专科听力学服务的比率为 1.38%。
我们的结果表明,该队列的总体转介率非常低,远低于国际基准和爱尔兰 UNHS 计划的初始结果。这有力地证明了在全国范围内的 UNHS 中,AABR 可作为 TEOAE 的潜在替代方法进行检查。