Suppr超能文献

经会阴再吻合术用于治疗高度复发性吻合口狭窄,作为尿流改道前的最后选择。

Transperineal reanastomosis for the treatment for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures as a last option before urinary diversion.

作者信息

Reiss Christoph Philip, Pfalzgraf Daniel, Kluth Luis Alex, Soave Armin, Fisch Margit, Dahlem Roland

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2014 Oct;32(5):1185-90. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1180-6. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of open transperineal reanastomosis (TPRA) for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures (AS) after radical prostatectomy. While the majority of AS can be managed successfully by endoscopic treatment, in highly recurrent AS, open reanastomosis represents a viable therapeutic option.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis by standardized questionnaire, inquiring for recurrence, incontinence, sexual function, satisfaction and changes in quality of life (QoL) in 15 patients undergoing TPRA 08/2007-03/2010.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 65 years (51-75) and mean follow-up 20.5 months (5.8-37.0). Success rate was 93.3 % (14/15). The single recurrence was successfully treated by cold knife incision. Incontinence was found in 93.3 % (14/15) preoperatively and aggravated in 60 % (9/15) after surgery; no de novo incontinence occurred. Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been performed successfully in 10 patients, 2 refused implantation and 2 are scheduled for surgery. Erectile dysfunction was present in 86.7 % (13/15); 13.3 % (2/15) reported a severely declined rigidity. Compared to preoperative status, 33.3 % (5/15) complained about impaired erectile function after TPRA. A good or very good subjective overall health status and an improvement in QoL were noted in 86.7 % (13/15). Patient satisfaction with the outcome of TPRA was high or very high in 13; two were undecided.

CONCLUSIONS

After repeated endoscopic treatment, TPRA is a valuable therapeutic option in selected patients with an overall success rate of 93.3 % (14/15) for anastomotic patency, which can even be raised to 100 % by further transurethral surgery. Incontinence can be easily treated by implantation of an AUS.

摘要

目的

评估开放性经会阴再吻合术(TPRA)治疗前列腺癌根治术后高度复发性吻合口狭窄(AS)的安全性和有效性。虽然大多数AS可通过内镜治疗成功处理,但对于高度复发性AS,开放性再吻合术是一种可行的治疗选择。

方法

通过标准化问卷进行回顾性分析,询问2007年8月至2010年3月期间接受TPRA的15例患者的复发情况、尿失禁情况、性功能、满意度及生活质量(QoL)变化。

结果

患者平均年龄65岁(51 - 75岁),平均随访20.5个月(5.8 - 37.0个月)。成功率为93.3%(14/15)。单次复发通过冷刀切开成功治疗。术前93.3%(14/15)存在尿失禁,术后60%(9/15)加重;未出现新发尿失禁。10例患者成功植入人工尿道括约肌(AUS),2例拒绝植入,2例计划手术。86.7%(13/15)存在勃起功能障碍;13.3%(2/15)报告阴茎硬度严重下降。与术前状态相比,33.3%(5/15)患者抱怨TPRA后勃起功能受损。86.7%(13/15)患者主观整体健康状况良好或非常好,QoL有所改善。13例患者对TPRA结果的满意度高或非常高;2例不确定。

结论

在反复内镜治疗后,TPRA是部分患者的一种有价值的治疗选择,吻合口通畅的总体成功率为93.3%(14/15),通过进一步经尿道手术甚至可提高至100%。尿失禁可通过植入AUS轻松治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验