Djuv Ane, Nilsen Odd Georg, Steinsbekk Aslak
Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013 Oct 30;13:295. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-295.
Different patient groups are known to use herbal remedies and conventional drugs concomitantly (co-use). This poses a potential risk of herb-drug interaction through altering the drug's pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Little is known about co-use among patients in general practice. The primary aim of this study was to compare patients in general practice that co-use herbal remedies and conventional drugs with those who do not. The secondary aim was to register the herb-drug combinations with potential clinical relevant interactions among the co-users.
A questionnaire based cross-sectional study conducted in the autumn 2011 in a general practice office with four general practitioners (GPs) and one intern in Western Norway. Adults >18 years who came for an office visit were invited. The questionnaire asked about demographics, herbal use, conventional drug use and communication about herbal use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare co-users to the other patients.
Of the 381 patients who completed the questionnaire, the prevalence of herbal use was 44%, with bilberry (41%), green tea (31%), garlic (27%), Aloe vera (26%) and echinacea (18%) as the most frequently used. Among those using conventional drugs regularly, 108 (45%) co-used herbs. Close to 40% of patients on anticoagulants co-used herbs, with garlic and bilberry as the most frequent herbs. Compared to all other patients, co-users had significantly (p < 0.05) increased odds to be female (adjOR 2.0), age above 70 years (adjOR 3.3), use herbs to treat an illness (adjOR 4.2), use two or more herbs (polyherbacy, adjOR 12.1) and having experienced adverse effects of herbal use (adjOR 37.5). Co-use was also associated with use of analgesics or dermatological drugs (adjOR 5.1 and 7.9 respectively). Three out of four patients did not discuss herbal use with any health care professional.
A sizable proportion of the GP patients co-used herbs with conventional drugs, also combinations with reported interaction potential or additive effects like anticoagulants and garlic. The low disclosure of herbal use to their GP, polyherbacy and the risk of interactions in vulnerable groups like elderly and chronically ill patients, warrant increased awareness among GPs.
已知不同患者群体同时使用草药疗法和传统药物(联合使用)。这可能通过改变药物的药代动力学或药效学带来草药 - 药物相互作用的潜在风险。对于全科医疗中的患者联合用药情况知之甚少。本研究的主要目的是比较全科医疗中联合使用草药疗法和传统药物的患者与不联合使用的患者。次要目的是记录联合使用者中具有潜在临床相关相互作用的草药 - 药物组合。
2011年秋季在挪威西部一个有四名全科医生(GP)和一名实习生的全科医疗诊所进行了一项基于问卷的横断面研究。邀请前来门诊就诊的18岁以上成年人参与。问卷询问了人口统计学信息、草药使用情况、传统药物使用情况以及关于草药使用的沟通情况。使用多变量逻辑回归来比较联合使用者与其他患者。
在完成问卷的381名患者中,草药使用率为44%,其中越橘(41%)、绿茶(31%)、大蒜(27%)、芦荟(26%)和紫锥菊(18%)是最常用的。在经常使用传统药物的患者中,108名(45%)联合使用了草药。近40%服用抗凝剂的患者联合使用了草药,其中大蒜和越橘是最常联合使用的草药。与所有其他患者相比,联合使用者为女性(调整后比值比2.0)、年龄在70岁以上(调整后比值比3.3)、使用草药治疗疾病(调整后比值比4.2)、使用两种或更多种草药(多种草药联合使用,调整后比值比12.1)以及有过草药使用不良反应(调整后比值比37.5)的几率显著增加(p < 0.05)。联合使用还与使用镇痛药或皮肤科药物相关(分别为调整后比值比5.1和7.9)。四分之三的患者未与任何医疗保健专业人员讨论过草药使用情况。
相当大比例的全科医疗患者联合使用草药和传统药物,包括一些具有报道的相互作用潜力或相加作用的组合,如抗凝剂和大蒜。患者向其全科医生透露草药使用情况较少、多种草药联合使用以及老年和慢性病患者等弱势群体中相互作用的风险,都需要全科医生提高认识。